09-24-2010, 05:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
All Pro Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,267
My Mood:
|
Re: Is the Offense better off without Faulk?
What you fail to consider is not only do they have no choice but they have no depth at RB ...I hardly think Woodhead is the answer.
Faulk was insurance at RB and the fact that BB failed to sign a FB the past 2 years hurts as well,we could have used one now.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|