A Nickel Package Without Wilhite? - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2010, 11:28 PM   #41
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,131
Default Re: A Nickel Package Without Wilhite?

Wilhite was a 4th round draft choice. I expected that he would develop into a reasonable nickel or dime back after a couple of years in the league.

As a rookie, he started the last four games, and starting eight games last year. He didn't look like a veteran corner. He was decidely below par for a starter. OK. So, we didn't have anyone better and had to have Wilhite start half our games in 2009. We were 5th in points allowed. Wilhite was OK, but we badly needed an upgrade. We drafted McCourty.

The BOTTOM LINE is that Wilhite should be an OK nickel and dime back. He is better than most #4 defensive backs in the league. He is probably an average nickel back, which is fine for a backup. Obviously, injuries have moved him to a starter position in the past. This week he is our nickel.

If Wilhite if is to be cut if he isn't a reasonable starter, then he should ahve been cut. Last I noticed, we had six corners on the squad. He doesn't need to be starter quality to contribute.

It is the beauty of a Belichick team that there is room for the Wilhite's of the world as depth.
mgteich is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-11-2010, 12:22 AM   #42
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,625
Default Re: A Nickel Package Without Wilhite?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
Wilhite was a 4th round draft choice. I expected that he would develop into a reasonable nickel or dime back after a couple of years in the league.

As a rookie, he started the last four games, and starting eight games last year. He didn't look like a veteran corner. He was decidely below par for a starter. OK. So, we didn't have anyone better and had to have Wilhite start half our games in 2009. We were 5th in points allowed. Wilhite was OK, but we badly needed an upgrade. We drafted McCourty.

The BOTTOM LINE is that Wilhite should be an OK nickel and dime back. He is better than most #4 defensive backs in the league. He is probably an average nickel back, which is fine for a backup. Obviously, injuries have moved him to a starter position in the past. This week he is our nickel.

If Wilhite if is to be cut if he isn't a reasonable starter, then he should ahve been cut. Last I noticed, we had six corners on the squad. He doesn't need to be starter quality to contribute.

It is the beauty of a Belichick team that there is room for the Wilhite's of the world as depth.
2 months ago most posters were saying McCourty couldnt beat out Wilhite for the nickel. Now Wilhite is a disaster at the nickel? What does that mean?
I think sometimes the criticism searches for its target.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 09-12-2010, 03:51 PM   #43
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 22
Default Re: A Nickel Package Without Wilhite?

It looks like there was a lot of "Big Nickel" with Chung/Sanders and Meriweather, and Wilhite was the dime back. I think Belichick might be sending Meriweather a message. Sanders played a ton, a couple weeks ago I heard some rumblings that he might be CUT.
HomelandDef is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LBs that can play nickel package. mesoslo Patriots Draft Talk 2 01-19-2008 01:49 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC