Biggest questionmarks facing our AFC foes - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2007, 12:05 AM   #11
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by drakesta101 View Post
I was under the impression that he was installing the 4-3 gradually.
Here's a link that will shed some light on what's going to happen with the Steelers' defense:

http://kdka.com/steelers/local_story_078231049.html

"One change Tomlin won't make immediately: switching to the 4-3 defense and Tampa 2 coverage scheme he prefers.

While he is expected to incorporate some elements of the 4-3 defense he used last season as Minnesota's defensive coordinator, a total overhaul isn't feasible with the players and the system currently in place.

The Steelers signaled that recently by re-signing defensive end Aaron Smith.

He is ideal for the 3-4 scheme they have played since the early 1980s but not so well-suited for the 4-3, especially if he had to move inside and play tackle.

Defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau has a number of key players who fit into the 3-4 much better than they would a 4-3 - linebackers Clark Haggans, James Farrior and James Harrison and defensive end Brett Keisel among them.

So any changes made now, in the spring minicamps and preseason training camp, are likely to be subtle."

If you watched the Steelers vs. Redskins Saturday night, the 3-4 was evident. Not as flexible as the Pats, the Steelers occasionally switch alignments, but their defensive personnel is better suited for the 3-4 at this time. They've been successful with it, and if it ain't broke, why fix it? Especially with LeBeau in place along with the players who make it go.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .
ClevTrev is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-19-2007, 12:08 AM   #12
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 330
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevTrev View Post
Here's a link that will shed some light on what's going to happen with the Steelers' defense:

http://kdka.com/steelers/local_story_078231049.html

"One change Tomlin won't make immediately: switching to the 4-3 defense and Tampa 2 coverage scheme he prefers.

While he is expected to incorporate some elements of the 4-3 defense he used last season as Minnesota's defensive coordinator, a total overhaul isn't feasible with the players and the system currently in place.

The Steelers signaled that recently by re-signing defensive end Aaron Smith.

He is ideal for the 3-4 scheme they have played since the early 1980s but not so well-suited for the 4-3, especially if he had to move inside and play tackle.

Defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau has a number of key players who fit into the 3-4 much better than they would a 4-3 - linebackers Clark Haggans, James Farrior and James Harrison and defensive end Brett Keisel among them.

So any changes made now, in the spring minicamps and preseason training camp, are likely to be subtle."

If you watched the Steelers vs. Redskins Saturday night, the 3-4 was evident. Not as flexible as the Pats, the Steelers occasionally switch alignments, but their defensive personnel is better suited for the 3-4 at this time. They've been successful with it, and if it ain't broke, why fix it? Especially with LeBeau in place along with the players who make it go.

Thanks for the info - I think this obviously benefits the Steelers. I have them pegged to win the North.
drakesta101 is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:49 AM   #13
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by drakesta101 View Post
Thanks for the info - I think this obviously benefits the Steelers. I have them pegged to win the North.
As stated, the Steelers should still be a force defensively. It's the offense where I believe they'll be most challenged.

In the AFC North, the Ravens are still the team to beat. The question marks are the Bengals and the Steelers. Can the Bengals stand up to the division and the conference defensively? Can the Steelers score enough to keep pace with the Bengals and overcome the Ravens strong defense? The Steelers have a new OC who is familiar with the system. The real wild card is Rothlisberger. If he's on, they could be 11-5, if not, 9-7 or worse. If I were betting:
1) Ravens (11-5)
2) Steelers (9-7)
3) Bengals (9-7)
4) Browns (5-11)

In this scenario, neither the Steelers nor the Bengals make the playoffs. Course, this is so much hot air at this time of year, but it makes it fun to pass the time. We'll see how close this is when the ammunition is live.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .

Last edited by ClevTrev; 08-19-2007 at 12:50 AM..
ClevTrev is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:51 AM   #14
In the Starting Line-up
 
slash83's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 3,022
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

I still am not convinced the jets should be running a 3-4, they just dont have the d-line for it and itl show this year just like it did last season.
slash83 is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:54 AM   #15
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 330
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

I agree - the Ravens will still be a force, but I have no faith in McNair and I think that his abilities or lack there of will stick out this season.
drakesta101 is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:59 AM   #16
Practice Squad
 
BoltsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 483
My Mood: Sad
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by drakesta101 View Post
BTW - I am not claiming to be an NFL analyst - these are my own opinions which are suposed to spur debate.
I think I understand that. :icon_smil
BoltsFan is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 01:05 AM   #17
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by drakesta101 View Post
I agree - the Ravens will still be a force, but I have no faith in McNair and I think that his abilities or lack there of will stick out this season.
Understood, but when the Ravens won Super Bowl XXXV, they had no offense to speak of yet beat the Giants 34-7. Defense wins games, which is why I can't count out the 2007 Steelers completely.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .

Last edited by ClevTrev; 08-19-2007 at 01:06 AM..
ClevTrev is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 01:18 AM   #18
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,498
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Saw the Denver/Dallas game tonight.

Yeah-Shanahan all but evaluates talent, and nothing more during preseason, but they nonetheless looked BAD tonight, especially on D.

Dallas played much of the first half w/o Owens and Glenn(and their 2 starting OTs), but they nonetheless torched the Broncos in the air AND on the ground(if it weren't for a couple of drops and a fumble by Sam Hurd, it would have been a lot worse)-and not to mention too that the Broncos played their starters the entire half to boot. And on O, the Broncos didn't look any better.(Yeah, Wade did some stunts and blitzing, but they were very ordinary, nothing special).

It's hard to say still, but the Broncos may have alot of trouble this year.
DisgruntledTunaFan is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 01:22 AM   #19
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,341
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by DisgruntledTunaFan View Post
Saw the Denver/Dallas game tonight.

Yeah-Shanahan all but evaluates talent, and nothing more during preseason, but they nonetheless looked BAD tonight, especially on D.

It's hard to say still, but the Broncos may have alot of trouble this year.
I'd go with your first statement about Denver. They're going to be a force this season. Just like the Pats, they are playing situations to get their team ready and to see how players fit. Nothing more, nothing less, and nothing long lasting can ever be gleaned from these games at this stage.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Dude Abides . . . .
ClevTrev is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 02:28 AM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 
italia44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Birthplace of John Casale,Revere,Ma R.I.P."Fredo"
Posts: 3,287
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Biggest Questionmarks Facing Our AFC Foes

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevTrev View Post
I'd go with your first statement about Denver. They're going to be a force this season. Just like the Pats, they are playing situations to get their team ready and to see how players fit. Nothing more, nothing less, and nothing long lasting can ever be gleaned from these games at this stage.
per ESPN:Eckuban is out for the year with
a ruptured achilles tendon.
italia44 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC