Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5. - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2007, 05:02 PM   #41
In the Starting Line-up
 
Keegs's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stupid Illinois
Posts: 4,917
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by feelthepain View Post
You're one of those that thinks that everything the Pats do is just 10 times better then everyone else aren't you? You think your team should just be handed the SB trophy simply because your favorite team is the Pats! I can tell by your posts, You don't seem greatfull at all for the success your teams had over the last 5 years, you act as if no one in the world should be allowed an opinion unless their Pats fans and they agree with everything "you" think!


Just because you think the Pats are 10 times better then everyone else doesn't mean they are, and if your team were good enough to be in the SB this year, they'd be in the SB. They're not, Deal with it! You think one bad call kept the Pats out of the SB??

I tell you what, name one big time game, post season, where the Pats were down by more then 4 points with the game on the line and Tom Brady marched the team down the field and scored a TD to win the game...name it!!! What I seem to recall is the Pats always being within a field goal and Brady throwing a against a bunch of prevent D's, but Adam Vinatieri kicking game winning field goals, and guess what! Where's Adam and wheres Tom?

Stop whining over one call, your teams won three SB's be happy and look forward to your 2 first round DP's and probably another double digit winning season next year.
Brady does what he needs to do to win big games. The team trusted Adam V so once they got into field goal range they'd let him kick it. I'm not sure using this to try and make Tom look bad is going to work, especially in this forum.

Also, i never said the pats were 10 times better than any team. I just don't l ike the refs screwing them over. And it was not one call. They blew it on several calls.

This is the 2nd year in a row that the Refs helped to defeat the pats. You can't say that they definitely would have won against denver or indy without the horrific calls, but the fact that this team has to beat their opponents AND the refs is complete b.s. This is also the 2nd year in a row that the refs made several B.S. calls that favored the Colts and then said "oops we screwed up" after the game....

but then again "the ball bounced our way" a lot....so i should be grateful.
whatever the hell that means.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Keegs is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-28-2007, 05:44 PM   #42
Banned
 
feelthepain's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 460
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
Brady does what he needs to do to win big games. The team trusted Adam V so once they got into field goal range they'd let him kick it. I'm not sure using this to try and make Tom look bad is going to work, especially in this forum.

Also, i never said the pats were 10 times better than any team. I just don't l ike the refs screwing them over. And it was not one call. They blew it on several calls.

This is the 2nd year in a row that the Refs helped to defeat the pats. You can't say that they definitely would have won against denver or indy without the horrific calls, but the fact that this team has to beat their opponents AND the refs is complete b.s. This is also the 2nd year in a row that the refs made several B.S. calls that favored the Colts and then said "oops we screwed up" after the game....

but then again "the ball bounced our way" a lot....so i should be grateful.
whatever the hell that means.
There isn't one true football fan that doesn't think Brady is one of the best QB's in the game of football, my point was to show you that Pats won their games as a team and lost as a team. Not because of good calls and bad calls. There was gonna come a time when the Colts were gonna get the win over the Pats in the playoffs, Peyton Manning is also one of the best QB's in the league, it's just this time he had the homefield and his "team" played better. Peyton still threw for over 340 yards and quite a few scores so it was just their time. A couple of bad calls the last two years is not enough to stop a team from winning if their good enough to win. In both cases for the Pats, they lost those two games because the better team won those two games, that's all there is to it. Just like when the Pats won, it was because they were the better team.
feelthepain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 06:54 PM   #43
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Hey "Keegs", you should quit your job at McDonald's and become a professional whiner. You'd probably make a lot more money.

Punked by Denver.

Punked by Indianopolis.

The Patriots are the Dynasty that never was!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
Brady would have 5 Rings if the refs didn't completely screw the pats over last year and this year.

pass interference calls, no touchback, "face guarding", non calls, bull**** offensive pass interference calls, bull**** roughing the passer calls.

I realize it sounds ridiculous, but if we Beat Denver last year and the Colts this year, the superbowl would have been ours both years. And most people on this site would agree i think

The Refs are ******* bull****. I don't even remember the last time we got a call in the playoffs that was questionable and went on OUR side.

The should not be allowed to **** up like that and then say "oh well my fault" 6 days later like it's no big deal.

this is two godamn years in a row they do that for the Colts and it finally worked this year.

If i didn't love this team so much and put so much godamn energy in them id stop watching this bull**** league.
Colts Bolts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 06:58 PM   #44
Practice Squad
 
thesmee1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 209
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts Bolts View Post
Hey "Keegs", you should quit your job at McDonald's and become a professional whiner. You'd probably make a lot more money.

Punked by Denver.

Punked by Indianopolis.

The Patriots are the Dynasty that never was!
The same could be said for the Chargers. One and done, baby!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg charger crying player.jpg (76.9 KB, 98 views)
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.








RIP Marquise Hill

RIP Darryl Stingley



For my two cents I don't consider Seau a charger anymore. I just hope he doesn't try to come back here and show off his ring. Its time that Seau and his restaurant move to NE and enjoy his life there. This is LT's town now.-Charger Dan

Move it on out here, Junior! New England welcomes you! You can surf off of Nantucket!
thesmee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 07:00 PM   #45
In the Starting Line-up
 
Keegs's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stupid Illinois
Posts: 4,917
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts Bolts View Post
Hey "Keegs", you should quit your job at McDonald's and become a professional whiner. You'd probably make a lot more money.

Punked by Denver.

Punked by Indianopolis.

The Patriots are the Dynasty that never was!
trust me, if i could get paid for whining i definitely would.

Was that supposed to hurt my feelings or something?



You can ask around, but you are definitely barking up the wrong tree.
Pick a differnet target unless you want to waste time.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Keegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 10:28 PM   #46
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
fgssand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 4,647
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts Bolts View Post
Hey "Keegs", you should quit your job at McDonald's and become a professional whiner. You'd probably make a lot more money.

Punked by Denver.

Punked by Indianopolis.

The Patriots are the Dynasty that never was!
Troll all you like but guess what - it is what it is and that would be an undeniable Dynasty for sure - thank you, thank you very much.

No whining here, Peyton played his best half of the season in the AFC Championship game and earned his chance to beat the Bears. Congrats to PM and the Colts - I wont think of diminishing that. I doubt they return in 2007, too many players to try to keep and too many guys wanting to get paid with too little cap space.

Chargers were out played in SD by NE and I think their window has already closed. Will be tough to do well, even with all that talent, with a lame duck coach and a skeleton staff.

Patriots can look forward to a healthy year for once (way overdue for that) along with a pile of draft choices and lots of returning players - some just entering their prime.

See the amazing thing here is that this team is getting younger as it goes along - setting things up for serious runs at Superbowl rings year in and year out.

There is no reason to believe that the 2007 Patriots will not be better than 2006. Look how close the 2006 team was to another ring - scary isn't it troll??
__________________
Season ticket holder since 1971, first in section 209 and now in 134.

LOVE New England sports....10 years SEVEN championships!!!
fgssand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 10:40 PM   #47
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
ATippett56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,075
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
Brady would have 5 Rings if the refs didn't completely screw the pats over last year.
Quit your bitchin'! Did the referees in the Denver game generate all those fumbles? Did the referees in the Denver game force Tom Brady to throw that interception to Champ Bailey? Did the referees in the Denver game cause Adam Vinatraitor to miss a field goal?

Last edited by ATippett56; 02-11-2007 at 10:41 PM..
ATippett56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 01:10 AM   #48
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
RyanTheColtsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Providence
Posts: 625
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
This is also the 2nd year in a row that the refs made several B.S. calls that favored the Colts and then said "oops we screwed up" after the game....

.
No. Ask Vic said someone screwed up the call. The NFL defended the decision.

You lost.
__________________
"I think manning cooked a grilled cheese back there in the pocket" - roman_maroney in the pats/colts gameday thread
RyanTheColtsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 10:38 AM   #49
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Yeah "keegs" please post a link where the refs admitted that they screwed up.

There was never any such admission from the refs or the NFL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
This is also the 2nd year in a row that the refs made several B.S. calls that favored the Colts and then said "oops we screwed up" after the game....
Colts Bolts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 11:07 AM   #50
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,341
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Brady would have 4 Rings, going on 5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keegs View Post
i cannot think of any breaks besides the tuck rule.

i honestly can't think of any questionable calls or non-calls in our favor
this is all a matter of perspective. we nursed our collective grudge over ben dreith's call for 25 years, but i doubt that raiders' fans have the foggiest memory of it. so, the poster was right who pointed out that other teams remember many games and many calls differently than we do.

winning an SB is a big bleeping deal and involves more than a little luck, that's why only 17 franchises have ever won even one, why only seven have won three or more, and why only eight have gone to five or more, as have the patriots.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
PatsFanSince74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC