The David Givens Delusion - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2006, 05:18 AM   #41
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot View Post
Branch wanted in the neighborhood of 7M per year. Instead of caving in we got a 2007 1st rounder.
I have a feeling with the great increases in the cap that by the 2007 draft Branch's salary demands aren't going to look the least bit out of line.
dhamz is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-20-2006, 07:44 AM   #42
Practice Squad
 
TomBradyWoot's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 399
Send a message via AIM to TomBradyWoot
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

I think Brady's confidence and comfort in Givens is being under estimated here. Yes, Reche may be just as good if not better in the future. But I think if we had David and Reche here the offense would be a lot better. I think if we had JUST lost David or JUST lost Deion then there wouldnt be a problem. But since we lost BOTH it has really held the passing game back.
TomBradyWoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 10:23 AM   #43
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern NH..off of rt 93
Posts: 389
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDD View Post
Not so fast -

I wouldn't trade Caldwell or C. Jackson for Givens.

Going beyond those two it's an unfair comparison, since Givens is a #2.
Givens is true quantity..I thi nk that Brady would make this trade in a heart beat....
aabtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 10:30 AM   #44
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 136
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23 View Post
I'll make this short and very likely not-so-sweet:

....

So let's please stop the LIE that is the coupling of Branch with Givens. It's ridiculous, baseless and silly.
...
A classic example of a straw man argument.

Your post could be used as an example in the Wikipedia article on the topic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_m...rhetorical_use
thomas144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 11:32 AM   #45
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,230
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDD View Post
Not so fast -

I wouldn't trade Caldwell or C. Jackson for Givens.

Going beyond those two it's an unfair comparison, since Givens is a #2.
I assume that you mean that you would not trade Caldwell, at $500K, for Givens, at $5M.

If that's what you mean, then I agree.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 11:37 AM   #46
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,230
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23 View Post
Branch is a totally legit "loss," but Givens is not since he's been ably replaced by Caldwell.

Can we please try to stay on point?
Instead of "ably", how about "marginally"?
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 11:45 AM   #47
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,201
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain stone View Post
Instead of "ably", how about "marginally"?


Caldwell 2006: Rec-53 Yds-611 TD-3 **With 2 games to go
Givens' Best Year w/ Pats: Rec-59 Yds-738 TD-2

So the question in response to your statement would be "whaaaaaaaat?"
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 11:49 AM   #48
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,201
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

And I wasn't going to even mention the disparities between the two this year!

Givens: Rec-8 Yds-104 TD-0 (of course, he's been hurt-but wasn;t that the rap before on Caldwell?)

Caldwell Rec-53 Tds-611 TD-3 for 16% of the price of Givens! (According to Miguel, his 2006 cap hit is $906k)

Please tell us how the Titans front office feels compared to the Pats front office on this one?
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 11:52 AM   #49
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,642
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks View Post
Well, except for the fact that in Branch's absence Givens averaged just under 5 receptions per game for an insane 19+ yards per average (38 catches for 739 yards) and put up 4 100+ yard games. In 14 games this year Reche is averaging just under 4 receptions per game for 11.5 yards per average (53 catches for 611 yards) and he's had 1 100+ yard game. In fact in the last two weeks he's only managed a total of 7 receptions for 34 yards.
Sorry, Mo. Not sure where you got your stats, but they are wrong.

During 2004, when Branch missed 7 games (Buffalo to Buffalo), Givens averaged 4.57 catches per game for 72.9 YPG. He had 32 catches for 510 yards. Not sure where you got the 38 for 739 from.

Now, why is it that you insist on comparing the offenses and then blaming the players? The players aren't the ones calling the plays. Brady, McDaniels and Belichick are. Caldwell is the go to guy on 3rd downs, more often than not. So, his yardage isn't going to be as high.




Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks View Post
And then there were Givens playoff performances. Maybe you should just review his Pat's bio - and then we can all hope he didn't set the post season bar too high for Reche.

"Career Highlights

Givens enjoyed a successful 2004 season, leading the Patriots with career-high 56 receptions and 874 yards. He was also able to stretch the field, with 14 receptions of 20 yards or more, including a season-best 50-yard catch against St. Louis (11/07/04).

Givens caught a touchdown pass in each of the Patriots’ three postseason games in 2004, including a 4-yard touchdown grab in Super Bowl XXXIX.

Givens exceeded 100 receiving yards in four games in 2004, the most by a Patriot in a single season in six years, dating back to when Terry Glenn also did it four times in 1999.

Givens became the Patriots’ all-time postseason leader for touchdown receptions (5) in 2004, surpassing Stanley Morgan (3).

Givens was a key part of the Patriots offense in the 2003 postseason, tying Troy Brown for the team lead with 17 receptions and leading the squad with two touchdowns.

Givens enjoyed a solid 2003 season in his second year as a pro. He led the team with seven touchdowns and finished second on the squad with 510 receiving yards. He was also a deep threat, catching nine passes of 20 yards or more.

Givens made a big impact in the Patriots’ victory in Super Bowl XXXVIII. He caught a 5-yard touchdown pass to give New England a 14-7 lead just before halftime, then grabbed two passes for a total of 43 yards on the Patriots’ key fourth-quarter touchdown drive that erased a one-point deficit and gave them a 29-22 lead late in the game.

Givens led the team in receptions in New England’s first two postseason games in 2003 – against Tennessee (4 catches) in the divisional playoffs and against Indianapolis (8 catches) in the AFC Championship Game."
No one is forgetting anything that Givens did. However, don't act like he's some hotshot that the Patriots were stupid for letting get away. Givens benefitted tremendously from the fact that he had Deion Branch opposite him drawing double teams, that he had Tom Brady throwing him the ball and Charlie Weiss calling the plays.

Caldwell hasn't done all the things you've mentioned, but Caldwell also wasn't in that offense. Caldwell has been used as a decoy on more than a few occasions during the season and opened things up for Watson and the others.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 12:05 PM   #50
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,230
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The David Givens Delusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmessy View Post
And I wasn't going to even mention the disparities between the two this year!

Givens: Rec-8 Yds-104 TD-0 (of course, he's been hurt-but wasn;t that the rap before on Caldwell?)

Caldwell Rec-53 Tds-611 TD-3 for 16% of the price of Givens! (According to Miguel, his 2006 cap hit is $906k)

Please tell us how the Titans front office feels compared to the Pats front office on this one?

I would not have paid Givens what the Titans paid him. On that, I think most of us are in agreement.

However, I strongly disagree that Caldwell = Givens. Reliability, strength, explosion, blocking, YAC - you name it, and Givens is superior.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC