I wasn't going to start a new thread with this because it just feeds their egos, but since one has been started already...
Out here in Western MA, if I want to listen to any sports talk prior to the game, I can choose FSR, which is probably still talking about T.O. right now, or WBCN and at least here something on the Pats. Sadly, it's not even that hard of a decision. During this pre-game show, the board's arch-nemesis had this to say:
Quote:
|
"In my dealings with the league, I hear this this all the time; 'Bill Belichick and Scott Pioli are too smart by a half.' What this means, of course, is that they aren't really any smarter than anyone else, they just think they are."
|
and this
Quote:
|
"They just come across as disengenuous and cheap"
|
Both refer to NE's FO in their dealings with Branch.
Gresh also had a long-winded (is there any other way?) point about how many of Brady's passes last year went to WRs, and DB in particular. It was actually pretty well reasoned, but it ignored the differences in the situations. In 2005, NE
* Couldn't run the ball. It is so much easier to get TEs involved in the passing game if the D respects the run.
* Lost Graham for much of the season due to injury. Even when he played, he was still hurt
and he had to help the OL with all of their injuries.
* Didn't have anywhere near the TE weapons that they have now. Thomas and Mills for Fauria; Watson looks much better; Graham will hopefully stay healthy.
* I mentioned it above, but it deserves its own point. The OL was in shambles, so that pulled a lot of TE passing plays out of the playbooks.
* Faulk missed 9 games. Dillon missed 4, Pass proved nearly useless after the first Buffalo game. Think that migh account for the lack of passes to RBs?
Nobody brought up any of these counterpoints.