Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2006, 09:45 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

If this is an example of how Reiss will replace Solomon as the beat reporter, I think the Globe just took a step forward. This piece covers the entire situation, gives lots of context and excellent analysis, without taking sides or letting personal opinion color the tenor of the information. Which is just what a beat reporter should do.

He points out some interesting observations including the apparent foundation of Chayut's underlying contention that Deion was somehow mistreated in the handling of his rookie deal. Mike notes that Chayut never filed a grievance at the time. I recall seeing another agents comments (a partner perhaps) at the time indicating the addition of the 5th year was being worked out via the addition of up to $3M in performance incentives (Deion apparently in hindsight had difficulty reaching for the most part).

I also like the tone Troy takes - supporting his guy but pointing out it's up to him to get his situation straightened out and get back to his teamates - who in his absence by necessity will move on...because it's their season or future or career on the line as well.

Mike mentions the franchise tag request and opines it is the most likely way Deion returns to camp. I think because of the implications it is the least likely. In fact I don't forsee any return short of voluntary. The way to bridge the gap on the contract is with incentives, but the way Chayut has behaved doesn't bode will for bridging the gap that way. I believe there likely is no deal on the table today in light of the holdout extending as it has well into TC. About the only relief Deion should expect is if he comes in sooner rather than later they will likely not impose those prohibitive fines.

What Chayut has accomplished to date is elevating his clients profile. But the pressure that will create returning from a holdout could cause him more harm than good. 32 GM's and the media will be watching his season unfold a lot more closely and critically than they have in the past. Kinda like the way many of us have as Pat's fans. Deion is a very good WR, but thus far he has certain limitations in his game that underlie his not being an elite #1. And those have obviously been factored in to the Pat's offer to slot him as the 13th-17th highest paid WR in a 3 year deal.

"A source close to the parties indicated they are not talking about salary figures because of the difference of opinion regarding Branch's value. The gap was described as being in different stratospheres.

The breakdown in talks traces to May, when the Patriots attempted to spark negotiations by offering Branch a contract extension through 2009. The offer included a $4 million signing bonus and $4 million option bonus payable in 2007. Branch's base salary for 2006 would be $1.045 million, followed by salaries of $1.4 million in 2007, $4.3 million in 2008, and $4.75 million in 2009. The deal also included workout bonuses of $300,000. Over the four years of the deal, Branch would be paid just shy of $5 million per year. Assessing only the three years added to the original contract, plus bonus money, Branch would be averaging about $6.25 million per year.

Looking at the contract over a four-year period (2006-09), Branch would be tied for 17th among NFL receivers in average salary per year with Washington's Santana Moss, St. Louis's Isaac Bruce, and Dallas's Terry Glenn. Focusing solely on the three years added to the original contract (2007-09), Branch would rank 13th in average salary per year, between Pittsburgh's Hines Ward (12th) and Miami's Chris Chambers and Denver's Rod Smith (tied for 14th). Currently, Branch's base salary ranks him 44th among NFL receivers (all rankings are as of the beginning of July).

There has been no dialogue between the sides since the offer in May, although there has been plenty of chatter elsewhere. Branch has told those close to him he was pleased to hear what he felt were supportive comments from quarterback Tom Brady that appeared in a Sports Illustrated piece this week.

Meanwhile, the Patriots continue to work at training camp shorthanded at receiver. Brown said it's no secret what the Patriots are missing in Branch, who led the team with 78 catches for 998 yards and led receivers with five touchdowns last season.

``You've seen him play," Brown said. ``He's a pretty good player. Right now, we just have to work with what we have. I think the guys are doing a good job of getting themselves ready to play. Deion, I think he needs to get his situation straightened out, and we'd like to have him back as soon as possible."

The problem, of course, is that it's difficult to straighten things out when the sides aren't talking. And as of yesterday, the lines of communication remained closed."


http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...and_no_return/
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-05-2006, 09:59 AM   #2
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,569
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Branch is just being a d!ck. He should play his contract out and if he needs to get an insurance policy against a career ender, so be it. Then in February, he'll either become a UFA or be franchised at around $7-$8M or so. Little jerk.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:03 AM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,803
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

It's just wrong-headed thinking by Branch. What he has to figure out is, where does he make the most money? If he holds out much longer, he loses money on his current contract. If he doesn't take what the Patriots might be offering him, he risks being franchised. If the Patriots don't franchise him, he better find someone who is willing to pay him more than $6.4 million a year in free agency, the year after holding out.

If Branch returns, he has the potential to be a bit diruptive if the ball doesn't go his way as often as he wants to in a contract year. Good thing Brady is the QB because I'm sure he'll have none of that.

I don't think any WRs will be happy with the Patriots this year. I'm expecting a dynamic and punishing running game with our strengths up the middle. 2 RBs, lots of TEs, big fast guys, and a lot of offensive lineman that excel in the running game, with Light, Mankins and Neal especially.

Good luck upping your stats.

I seriously question whether Branch will receive $6.5 to 7 million in the open market, and if he does receive that much, it's definitely not worth the risk of injury for an extra say $1 million over the length of the contract.

There's one way out here, that Branch agrees to the Patriots total money but asks for a bigger bonus. I think that would be fair because it would give Branch some protection in case he gets injured this year or next. Settle it for $5 million onus each season, and it's done.

If not, Branch is making a bonehead error.

Last edited by SoonerPatriot; 11-09-2005 at 03:27 AM..
upstater1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:06 AM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,803
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Thanks for posting that Mo. I was on vacation last week so I was out of the loop for awhile but wasn't it bantied about that the Pats made a contract offer but Branch's camp never came back with a counter-offer. What kind of negotiating is that?

Personally I think Branch is doing himself more harm than good.
__________________
Great teams aren't always great. They are just great when they have to be. - NFL Films Narrator


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Willie55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:08 AM   #5
Moderator
 
T-ShirtDynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eating it! (Humble Pie that is)
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Oh this is gonna suck. Even worse, I can't shake the feeling that, even though we want to do what it takes to win this year... the FO has got to keep an eye on the future and not give in to this crap.

Let him sit, then Tag and trade him next year.

Damnit Branch.
T-ShirtDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:10 AM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
363839's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,426
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

I like Deion. He's such a great player...when he's healthy.

Like Willie before him, I want him to stay in NE, of course, but I wouldn't begrudge him for getting as much as he feels he's worth on the market...
..when his contract with the Pats expires.

While he sits on his ass he can watch his eventual replacements get all his reps and when and if he rejoins the team he'd better show us something this year. I wouldn't want to be him if he doesn't perform.
363839 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:11 AM   #7
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,569
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

The whole WR thing is interesting. We know about Branch. Jerry Porter wants out. Lelie is still at home. Stallworth is in but that situation still doesn't sound happy. I wonder when something will break with these guys.

If we could sign the new guy long term I'd trade Branch for :

Stallworth and flip flop our #2 with New Orleans'.
Porter straight up.
Lelie with us getting a good draft pick (our #2 for their #1 as an example).
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:12 AM   #8
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,569
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Quote:
Originally Posted by 363839
I like Deion. He's such a great player
He seemed like a great PERSON too.

As the Cindy Lauper song goes : "Money . . . Money Changes Everything".
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 10:33 AM   #9
Banned
 
QuiGon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,123
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
If this is an example of how Reiss will replace Solomon as the beat reporter, I think the Globe just took a step forward. This piece covers the entire situation, gives lots of context and excellent analysis, without taking sides or letting personal opinion color the tenor of the information. Which is just what a beat reporter should do.
This Reiss guy has got to go. He is such a good reporter that I have nothing to whine and complain about. He provides complete information on a controversial matter in a fair, unbiased way without any personal vendettas against specific players and/or management. Doesn't he realize that is not the way to build a career in this city..?!?

Last edited by QuiGon; 08-05-2006 at 10:36 AM..
QuiGon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 11:24 AM   #10
Moderator
 
T-ShirtDynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eating it! (Humble Pie that is)
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuiGon
This Reiss guy has got to go. He is such a good reporter that I have nothing to whine and complain about. He provides complete information on a controversial matter in a fair, unbiased way without any personal vendettas against specific players and/or management. Doesn't he realize that is not the way to build a career in this city..?!?
*waits for I'm Ron Borges' head to explode*
T-ShirtDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566