Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2006, 01:47 PM   #91
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,395
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Unless Kansas City gives him a huge offer, we will probably have a shot at matching it.
5 Rings for Brady!! is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-16-2006, 01:54 PM   #92
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,815
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah
Doesn't matter. He's also beting that one of 30 odd teams loses a starting CB to injury early in camp and their GM then panics, offering Law big bucks. Not a stupid strategy, especially if the Pats have indicated some form of willingness to sign him if available.
Most years that strategy isn't all that smart because need aside teams are by and large up against the cap. This year is different because of what the cap windfall created - multiple teams with space to burn. Last year he was a huge unknown because he was still noticably hobbled into August and as a result playing overweight. This year he has recovered sufficiently to complete his own off season training program with Bob Kearse.

Belioli knows it gains you nothing to push Ty for a financial decision. That just plays into the Poston's only hand which is the promise that something better will come along. He could show up here midway through camp and his talent and familiarity with the system would vault him to starting LCB. Then Hobbs, Samuel and Gay would be left to duke it out for the RCB, nickle and dime spots. In KC Surtain is #1 by virtue of his contract (which poses a philosophical financial problem for Ty) but there too he immediately vaults to RCB and his relationship with Herm and his D trumps any missed reps.

Only problem with waiting besides pissing off impatient fans is the team who develops sufficient need to overpay may be a team mired in suckitude and/or QB controversy like the one he played for last season. He says money aside (which Ty almost never says) he won't do that again. Pretty much rules out TN. And there is the issue of his kids being on the east coast. All in all just makes me think we are the front runner pending a better offer that we decline to match. And unless it constitutes an overpay, I think we match because he would be the #1 CB on this roster by a mile.

Did he freelance last season? Absolutely. But that was because he was playing for Mr. Motivation as opposed to the X's and O's genius who knows how to maximize his ball hawking skills while maintaining discipline within a scheme.

Last year we paid $6M+ for the tandem of a guy who once again couldn't get on the field and another who should never have seen the field in our uniform. Early on in this off season BB tried to sign Pittsburgh FA Deshea Townsend to be a starting corner and veteran leader in this backfield. So apparently he thinks we need one of those. When he opted to return to the Steelers we signed Warfield to a salary only fallback contract. Hobbs is a potential diamond in the rough. Asante is an enigma. Gay is like a phantom - we havent seen him play in over a year.

I think we need Ty Law. We could be OK without him, but I'd just as soon not roll those dice unless I have no choice.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 01:55 PM   #93
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,004
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5 Rings for Brady!!
Ray Clay: Ty Law is far better than any of those other guys, and what they did or did not do doesn't matter to me. I prefer Law to any of them, by a huge margin.

Law was talking in hindsight, so he was well aware of the injuries.
Well one of them was Rodney Harrison so I'll dispute that.

Plus there's were six that might have been healthy. I'm not disputing that Law was the only all pro cornerback of the bunch, but the question of whether we could win a SuperBowl without Law was answered the year before.

Could Law have been the difference to A Super Bowl last year? Yes.

Could a decent starting safety and/or cornerback been the difference also?
Yes.

Considering our injuries any good veteran defensive back available near the start of the season could have.

Ty is a former all pro. However he is also older with a worrisome injury for his position, (lis franc).

It seems the league has re-evaluated his worth and I would now pick him up at the right price.
__________________
Quote:
“It was just like coach said, when we need a yard we have to be able to get a yard by any means necessary,’’ ... “Whatever we’ve got to do - run, throw, drag, kick, scratch. Whatever we have to do to get that yard we have to be able to line up and get 1 yard.’’
RayClay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 02:00 PM   #94
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,395
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Ray Clay, I agree with that, except for the part about Rodney. He can't play CB, as far as I know. Maybe better than Starks, however.

Rodney can't provide a year's worth of one on one coverage, and leadership only goes so far from a different position. You still need somebody to play CB at a high level.

But not to diss Rodney, because we could have made it further with a healthy Rodney. But that is not what Law meant when he said that he could have made a difference.

All I am saying is that in Hindsight, what Law said is not totally crazy or anything.

Last edited by 5 Rings for Brady!!; 07-16-2006 at 02:06 PM.
5 Rings for Brady!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 02:28 PM   #95
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seacoast NH
Posts: 9,990
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
Most years that strategy isn't all that smart because need aside teams are by and large up against the cap. This year is different because of what the cap windfall created - multiple teams with space to burn. Last year he was a huge unknown because he was still noticably hobbled into August and as a result playing overweight. This year he has recovered sufficiently to complete his own off season training program with Bob Kearse.

Belioli knows it gains you nothing to push Ty for a financial decision. That just plays into the Poston's only hand which is the promise that something better will come along. He could show up here midway through camp and his talent and familiarity with the system would vault him to starting LCB. Then Hobbs, Samuel and Gay would be left to duke it out for the RCB, nickle and dime spots. In KC Surtain is #1 by virtue of his contract (which poses a philosophical financial problem for Ty) but there too he immediately vaults to RCB and his relationship with Herm and his D trumps any missed reps.

Only problem with waiting besides pissing off impatient fans is the team who develops sufficient need to overpay may be a team mired in suckitude and/or QB controversy like the one he played for last season. He says money aside (which Ty almost never says) he won't do that again. Pretty much rules out TN. And there is the issue of his kids being on the east coast. All in all just makes me think we are the front runner pending a better offer that we decline to match. And unless it constitutes an overpay, I think we match because he would be the #1 CB on this roster by a mile.

Did he freelance last season? Absolutely. But that was because he was playing for Mr. Motivation as opposed to the X's and O's genius who knows how to maximize his ball hawking skills while maintaining discipline within a scheme.

Last year we paid $6M+ for the tandem of a guy who once again couldn't get on the field and another who should never have seen the field in our uniform. Early on in this off season BB tried to sign Pittsburgh FA Deshea Townsend to be a starting corner and veteran leader in this backfield. So apparently he thinks we need one of those. When he opted to return to the Steelers we signed Warfield to a salary only fallback contract. Hobbs is a potential diamond in the rough. Asante is an enigma. Gay is like a phantom - we havent seen him play in over a year.

I think we need Ty Law. We could be OK without him, but I'd just as soon not roll those dice unless I have no choice.
Normally I don't quote an entire post but that was right on target and worth re-reading.

And to those others in this thread, BB could not care less what Ty Law once 'said'.
Machs nix.
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 02:37 PM   #96
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,004
Default Re: Ty Law Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5 Rings for Brady!!
Ray Clay, I agree with that, except for the part about Rodney. He can't play CB, as far as I know. Maybe better than Starks, however.

Rodney can't provide a year's worth of one on one coverage, and leadership only goes so far from a different position. You still need somebody to play CB at a high level.

But not to diss Rodney, because we could have made it further with a healthy Rodney. But that is not what Law meant when he said that he could have made a difference.

All I am saying is that in Hindsight, what Law said is not totally crazy or anything.
Not crazy at all. That's not what I was implying. It's just that their defensive backfield was in total disarray.

Despite that, the coaches pulled it together both years. An experienced vet would have made a world of difference. They had bigger problems by the end of the year.

You could logically have said Antowain Smith would have led them to the Super Bowl. That doesn't mean I want to pick him up this year.
__________________
Quote:
“It was just like coach said, when we need a yard we have to be able to get a yard by any means necessary,’’ ... “Whatever we’ve got to do - run, throw, drag, kick, scratch. Whatever we have to do to get that yard we have to be able to line up and get 1 yard.’’
RayClay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 02:41 PM   #97
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,006
Default Re: Ty Law Question

make it go away

pleeeeeease

no more talk about ty law

pleeeeeeeease
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426