Patriots; rookie cap allotment - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2006, 08:22 AM   #21
Patriots Salary Cap Guru
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,470
My Mood: Happy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixPat
The rookie signing cap affects this year's contracts only - teams can stretch out the remainder of the contracts in later years regardless of this year's cap.
In the old CBA there were limits on how much a draft pick's salary could increase during the contract. I have not heard that the new CBA remove those limits.

Quote:
3. Assuming Jackson works out as a #2 WR (and that's always a question with rookies) - what is Jackson's cap hit and contract looking like compared to say, David Givens.
Barrett Rudd was drafted in Jackson's slot last year. I have been unable to find info on his contract.
Quote:
My ultimate point here is that, assuming Jackson is as good as BB & Co. believe, we've got a MONSTER net cap savings over the next 5-6 years ... and that savings can go to address other needs and help keep the dynasty going.
Every team who filled in the draft a need caused by a departure of a veteran can say the same thing. Examples - Addai for James, Holmes for ARE, Williams for Stephen Dave
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-06-2006, 08:48 AM   #22
Patriots Salary Cap Guru
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,470
My Mood: Happy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot
Wait are you saying that there will be no longer RFAs starting with the 2006 draft?
No, teams can still sign draft picks to 3-year deals, if they chose to do so.

Quote:
Getting Jackson for only 4 years is fine, but don't the Pats get at least top offer a year or 2 after that?
Only if the Pats place the franchise tag on Jackson.

Quote:
And if another team signs they would get compensated a draft pick depending on tender?
No.
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2006, 08:48 AM   #23
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot
Wait are you saying that there will be no longer RFAs starting with the 2006 draft? Getting Jackson for only 4 years is fine, but don't the Pats get at least top offer a year or 2 after that? And if another team signs they would get compensated a draft pick depending on tender?
RFA's were always only players with 3 years of service whose contract expired. Teams that draft you ultimately control you for up to 4 years via the RFA. Branch signed a 5 year deal - when it's done he will be a UFA without ever being an RFA because he was under contract beyond year 4. Givens signed a 3 year deal. When it was done (after 2004) the team still had the option to tender him as a RFA to retain him for that 4th season (or get the pick that went with his tender from a team that was willing to match that offer). A player like Givens finally saw some compensation relief in that way because his value to us had to be acknowledged by using a mid tender (which carries a 1st round pick as compensation and a 7 figure salary) to ward off suitors as opposed to the low tender which would have allowed any team that wanted him to match for just his standard 6 figure 4th year salary and a 7th round compensation pick compensation in return.

Apparently the union wanted and got with the new CBA an earlier FA date for those who sometimes got stuck in bad 5 year deals - generally 2nd and 3rd or later rounders who substantially outperformed rookie deals that often included relatively small signing bonuses and 6 figure minimum salaries through year 5. They will all now be free to persue the all important second contract in year 5 as UFA's, and all their team will get if they sign elsewhere is the potential of the formula based comp pick that weighs their performance and the value of the deal they get elsewhere but is offset by comparable FA signings by the team during that off season.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2006, 12:26 PM   #24
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel

Quote: My ultimate point here is that, assuming Jackson is as good as BB & Co. believe, we've got a MONSTER net cap savings over the next 5-6 years ... and that savings can go to address other needs and help keep the dynasty going.


Every team who filled in the draft a need caused by a departure of a veteran can say the same thing. Examples - Addai for James, Holmes for ARE, Williams for Stephen Dave
Well, yes but there is a difference in drafting a starting OL at 21 - and drafting a staring WR or RB.

O Linemen are part of a squad and generally don't earn as much as starting RBs and WRs - the premier positions.


Sure all rookies earn less than FAs but the distinction at a position like OL isn't as great as it is for rookies and FAs playing positions like WR & RB

In other words - what's the average FA price for starting OL and what's the average FA price for starting WRs

If the Pats addressed #2 WR with Jackson they saved themselves a TON of money compared to what they were prepared to offer Givens
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2006, 04:19 PM   #25
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
Apparently the union wanted and got with the new CBA an earlier FA date for those who sometimes got stuck in bad 5 year deals - generally 2nd and 3rd or later rounders who substantially outperformed rookie deals that often included relatively small signing bonuses and 6 figure minimum salaries through year 5. They will all now be free to persue the all important second contract in year 5 as UFA's, and all their team will get if they sign elsewhere is the potential of the formula based comp pick that weighs their performance and the value of the deal they get elsewhere but is offset by comparable FA signings by the team during that off season.
Will this affect Watson? Didn't he sign for 6 years?
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2006, 04:47 PM   #26
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default

The new CBA only effects deals that come after it.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2006, 05:11 PM   #27
Patriots Salary Cap Guru
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,470
My Mood: Happy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixPat
Well, yes
We will agree on this.

Quote:
In other words - what's the average FA price for starting OL and what's the average FA price for starting WRs
Because an elite left tackle never actually reach the free agent market, this question is misleading because the top OL are typically left tackles. I am not interested in this to do the research. Please feel free to do so.


Quote:
If the Pats addressed #2 WR with Jackson they saved themselves a TON of money compared to what they were prepared to offer Givens
I am not disagreeing with this. I am just opining that the cap savings does not give the Pats any competitive edge since every team saves money when a draft pick replaces a departed free agent.
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC