ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
View Poll Results: Where Would You Start Vollmer In 2010?
LT
28
32.56%
LG
1
1.16%
RT
57
66.28%
nowhere, have him as a swing back and an LT is 2011
Except for when there were injuries, the line for the past four years has been Light, Mankins,Koppen, Neal and Kaczur.
The LEAST disruption would be four four of the players to play where they have for four years and have Vollmer start at LG where many college LT's start in the nfl. The decision would come next year when the decision is made whether to keep Light. In any case, are there questions here about the ability of Vollmer to play LG. Mankins has been an pro-bowl LG. Is there a reason why Vollmer cannot be an all-pro LG? Kaczur would not be the biggest question mark iof Vollmer started at LG. The biggest question would be Neal's health.
Starting Kaczur at LG is a fine idea. We'll try it in camp. It is my best option. HOWEVER, I am not at all sure he will be effective at LG. He has played OT for his career. The question is whether he is goo enough to start at a new position.
=========================
KACZUR
Many think that the best RT we've had under Belichick is a liability starting at RT. This makes no sense to me. I suspect that it makes little sense to Belichick who extended him to a fine contract instead of draftng a RT in 2009. Yes, Kaczur needs help against top speed rushers. He is not a TOP rated RT. He plays fine when Neal is in there and there is a tight end who can block, even against top rushers. For me, Kaczur is an average talent who will not lose us games.
I am not at all sure that Kaczur will be a solid LG, but that is what camp is for.
==============================
THE "REAL" QUESTION FOR THE 2010 LINE
I think that real question is how may games Neal is healthy for. The dropoff from Neal to Connoplly is considerable.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Today's myth: Nick Kaczur is a disaster on the right side. The link below contains pro foorball focus rankings of NFL offensive tackles (thanks, crowell33, for reminding me of this site!).
Kaczur is ranked #28 overall, 14th among regular right tackles. He's also the ONLY tackle in the NFL who rates as average across the board (pass blocking, run blocking, screen blocking). He doesn't excell anywhere, but there are no liabilities in his game. Also note, ZERO PENALTIES in 2009!
This links to Kaczur's individual page. We see that Kaczur struggled against Baltimore (vs. Jarrett Johnston), Indy (vs. Robert Mathis) and Carolina vs. Julius Peppers). Not exactly lightweightsAgainst all other opponents he either played average football or held a slight advantage.
So the bottom line is, in Kaczur, we're looking at an average right tackle at worst. And, I would say, 2009 was a down year for Kaczur.
We spent a week a few weeks ago debunking these stats arguing with Jets fans talking about how great Ferguson is. So I am not going back on it now. These stats are subjective and I don't buy into them at all.
From my point of view, the o-line worked best last year with Light at LT and Vollmer at RT. Why screw with that? Brady didn't have a sack for over a month at that point.
And why do you think that Kaczur will give you the same result in place of Mankins.
Is it that LG's can be anybody? Or is that Vollmer is a one-trick pony and cannot play LG.
I am somewhat amazed when the consensus is that Light and Vollmer are the inflexible players and that Kaczur is so good that he can learn a new position late in his career and replace a probowler without consequence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
From my point of view, the o-line worked best last year with Light at LT and Vollmer at RT. Why screw with that? Brady didn't have a sack for over a month at that point.
And why do you think that Kaczur will give you the same result in place of Mankins.
Is it that LG's can be anybody? Or is that Vollmer is a one-trick pony and cannot play LG.
I am somewhat amazed when the consensus is that Light and Vollmer are the inflexible players and that Kaczur is so good that he can learn a new position late in his career and replace a probowler without consequence.
I don't know anyone who's claiming that Vollmer is an inflexible player. On the other hand, and has been pointed out elsewhere, Light is an inflexible player. From the mouth of the coach:
Quote:
"In my brilliance," Belichick said with a smile, "I put [Light] at right tackle as a rookie. It didn’t really work out at all. He has the physical skills to play over there. But, then, he just … Matt’s just a left tackle
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
And why do you think that Kaczur will give you the same result in place of Mankins.
When did I say that? I said the o-line worked best with Light at LT and Vollmer at RT.
Quote:
Is it that LG's can be anybody? Or is that Vollmer is a one-trick pony and cannot play LG.
Never said that either. I think Vollmer is pretty versatile since he can play both LT and RT. I just think Kazcur is better suited at guard than Vollmer and I think Vollmer at RT serves the team more.
Quote:
I am somewhat amazed when the consensus is that Light and Vollmer are the inflexible players and that Kaczur is so good that he can learn a new position late in his career and replace a probowler without consequence.
I am somewhat amazed that you are putting words in my mouth (on on my keyboard). Your amazement may be in part that you are reading things in my post that clearly aren't there. I think Kazcur is suited to play guard. I think we got tackle play with Light at LT and Vollmer at RT. When you have a successful tackle combination, you shouldn't screw with it.
Also, I would be worried about Vollmer's height with him playing the interior part of the line. He might block some of Brady's sightlines. Vollmer is four inches taller than both Kazcur and Brady. So I guess I am saying that Vollmer is too tall to play guard.
BTW, are you amazed at the close mindedness of Bill Belichick? He has Light at LT, Kazcur at LG, and Vollmer at RT. I don't expect that line up to change unless Mankins returns or injuries happen.
From left to right:
Ideally: Light, Mankins, Koppen, Neal, Vollmer with Kaczur as backup at 3 positions
With Mankins being a whiny "something": Light, Kaczur, Koppen, Neal, Vollmer
Ideally, when Neal is hurt: Light, Mankins, Koppen, Kaczur, Vollmer
Ideally, when Light is hurt: Vollmer, Mankins, Koppen, Neal, Kaczur
Neal is hurt w/o Mankins: Light, Kacuzr, Koppen, Connolly, Vollmer
Light is hurt w/o Mankins: Vollmer, Kaczur, Koppen, Neal, LeVoir
Light and Neal hurt w/o Mankins: Vollmer, Kaczur, Koppen, Connolly, LeVoir
Being a Canuck it is hard to say this but NIck has gotta mozy over to LG...I do not have stats to back this up but it appeared that #12 has experienced some pressure from that side quite often the past couple years. Don't know if it is scheme or personnel...
Vollmer could play LT, RT and perhaps LG. Where would you like to start him?
If Mankins returns, I'd have Vollmer compete with Kaczur for RT. If Kaczur plays LG, I would have Vollmer play RT.
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
And why do you think that Kaczur will give you the same result in place of Mankins.
Is it that LG's can be anybody?
Only Logan Mankins can play left guard. No one else. Once Mankins leaves, this year or 2015, the Patriots will never win a single game again.
Come on, who said anybody can play LG?
Playing OG (l or R) plays to Kaczur's strenth. He is much stronger against the bull rush than speed rush. Hasn't that been evident?
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
Re: Where would you start Vollmer this year?
Linear Mode
