Felger: Pats moving to a more "aggressive" scheme? - Page 9 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2010, 09:00 PM   #81
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
doesntmatter1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 643
Default Re: Felger: Pats moving to a more "aggressive" scheme?

Gary Guyton sitting on the bench will go a long way for this team. He always gets blown off the line. He was the weakest lb at the combine and it shows on the field. As far as I am concerned, Mcgowan can do everything Guyton does but better. Guyton needs to seriously get stronger. Spikes hopefully will make a huge impact this season. He has shown the ability to blitz up the middle; something we have missed for awhile now.
doesntmatter1 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-20-2010, 12:32 AM   #82
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patspsycho's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 20 minutes from Foxboro
Posts: 9,930
Default Re: Felger: Pats moving to a more "aggressive" scheme?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillBelichickFan79 View Post

Any time this defense played a good QB, it got sliced and diced for the most part. Hell, Chad Henne made us look silly. Was that due to the lack of pressure and/or scheme OR the personnel and it's immaturity/miscommunication? I think it was a combination of both. Yes the defense blew assignments and showed its inexperience at times, but is that scheme really the best type of D to defend in this new NFL? As I said in the post above, it is a defense playing the percentages relying on the fact that the opponent will eventually make a mistake and in a way "beat themself." It seems like the QB's are getting better and better as an astonishing 10 QB's passed for more than 4,000 yards. That shows me that the passing game is becoming much more prolific and more and more QB's are becoming adept at throwing with precision and making intelligent decisions.

I don't think that "monster" OLB is an absolute need, but I do not see how it can hurt at all. Having a guy of that caliber will demand double teams and, in essence, will open up room for the other pass rushers to operate. I don't think this defense is built for the "elite" OLB type anyway. The Pats are never really going to have a guy with 15 sacks like a Ware because their OLB job is to engage their blocker and read run/pass and then react. Guys like Ware, Merriman, Woodley, Suggs etc. are all just coming after the QB on most plays, not having to worry about 2-gapping.
It specifically got sliced and diced by only one quarterback all season long, and that QB was Brees.

You could argue that Manning had his way late in the Colts game, but the defense was doing well for the most part what with the phantom PI party Polian & Co. seem to elicit every time we come to play, and we did have a chance to win that game.

Look at it this way: we were a very uncharacteristic 1-6 on the road, blew 3 leads (where we used to have just one loss in four or so years of holding onto a 2nd half lead), couldn't score in the 2nd half.

If not for those, we'd be at least 13-3, and at 13-3 would we be having arguments like this?

I get a real kick out of the fact that 10-6 is unacceptable around here. That just tells me how good this organization is, when they've raised the standard so high that 10 wins upsets a lot of people.

10 wins in a transition season, both for the defense and for Brady. How terrible.
Patspsycho is offline  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:07 AM   #83
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
FreeTedWilliams's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: free from the cold
Posts: 5,032
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Felger: Pats moving to a more "aggressive" scheme?

Excellent posts by all...

I keep looking at the new Pats personel and keep thinking that a new defensive scheme is coming. If we suppose a 3-4 base the Pats would llok like this:
Warren-Wilfork-Warren/et al
Burgess-Spikes-Mayo-TBC/Cunningham
Bodden-Meriweather-Chung/Sanders-Butler

What if BB went 4-3 and did this?
Warren-Wilfork-Brace/Wright-Cunningham
Mayo-Spikes-Burgess/TBC
Bodden-Meriweather-Chung/Sanders-Butler

I think that Spikes is going to be the key. The kid was the true leader of that Florida defense for a few years. He just seems to be there to make big plays. Either way, he is going to free up Mayo to be much more of a penetrator. Guyton has no business playing on running downs, he will make a decent obvious passing downs sub for Spikes. What about McKenzie? Where does he fit in? Do we dare even mention Crable? The Pats seem to have a ton of POTENTIAL. Cunningham is the wild card. He has the skills to be a force at OLB or 4-3 DE, obviously you have to think with the closeness of BB to Urban and UF program, he knew what he was doing when he took Cunningham over Dunlap. You have to be excited about Butler's play last year. I thought that he kept getting better. Hopefully he can make a Meriweatherian leap in year two.

Some things I think will happen:

Either Sanders or McGowan will be traded before the season starts.
Spikes will take over at ILB and lead the defense.
Meriweather will continue to emerge as an elite player.
Kade Weston will be the Myron Pryor of this year, and will suprize a few people.
Pierre Woods will not make this team (thank God Almighty!)

Again, like everyone is saying, the defensive backfield has plenty of talent. The ILB corps seems to be set. Warren and Wilfork and as steady as evah, the real question remians at the other DE and OLB, which is of course, the pass rush.

I wish that the Pats could have come out of the draft with a Running back. I loved the two new TEs and think that Endleman is going to have a great year. The offense seems to have plenty of weapons, maybe Maroney will finally be the back that we hoped for. I just don't get the doom and gloom predictions of the national mediaits. This team has added some serious young talent at WR, TE, ILB, CB, S, & OL over the last few years. They still have the best QB on the planet and hoepfully not playing with broken ribs this year. And perhaps the biggest improvment, WE HAVE FINALLY DRAFTED A PUNTER!!!!!
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FreeTedWilliams is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis of OT's as they fit in the Pats scheme Ochmed Jones Patriots Draft Talk 2 03-25-2008 01:35 PM
Analysis of corners asthey fit in the Pats scheme Ochmed Jones Patriots Draft Talk 19 03-24-2008 11:15 PM
Did you expected the Pats so 'aggressive' in free agency ? italian pat patriot PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 49 03-04-2007 07:25 AM
Reiss Said The PAts Would Be Aggressive in Free Agency, But Come on! BigMike PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 03-03-2007 07:23 PM
Felger’s take on the Pats…and mine on Felger shatch62 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 09-25-2006 11:29 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566