Restricted trio may be forced to hold out - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2010, 08:15 PM   #1
Ian
Administrator
 
Ian's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seacoast, NH
Posts: 4,468
Blog Entries: 3
My Mood: Mellow
Default Restricted trio may be forced to hold out

Noticed this article tonight and thought I'd post it here since there's some interesting fodder from Jason Cole regarding Mankins:

Restricted trio may be forced to hold out - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
__________________
--
PatsFans.com - Dedicated to the Best Fans on Earth

Facebook
Become A Fan of / I mean "Like" PatsFans.com On Facebook:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Twitter Feeds

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ian is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-26-2010, 08:24 PM   #2
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,576
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

93% of the people visiting the site have voted 'MEH' Mankins ... because

business is business and we need to spend our time talking about the players who are here.
IcyPatriot is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 08:34 PM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,651
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

Mankins got a bad deal from the league, however he's certainly not worth what Wilfork is to this team and it appears he was offered a good contract (that's relative, of course).

If he loses out and eventually gets what seems to me as more than he's worth, good luck to him, but he's not worth that much to us.
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT

Last edited by RayClay; 06-26-2010 at 10:01 PM..
RayClay is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 08:49 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,143
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

If he isn't worth the money to us, then we should trade him (with his cooperation of course).

Last edited by mgteich; 06-26-2010 at 08:49 PM..
mgteich is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 09:53 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,625
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
If he isn't worth the money to us, then we should trade him (with his cooperation of course).
That assumes he is worth the money to anyone, which is not certain.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 09:57 PM   #6
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,293
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
If he isn't worth the money to us, then we should trade him (with his cooperation of course).
We aren't paying him anything. Surely he is worth keeping for free? Worst case scenario, he never pays for us and gets a big contract and we get a 3rd round compensatory pick.

Probably only get a 4th for him if we try to trade him anyway. All this talk about a first round pick is nuts. If he was worth that someone woud have made an RFA offer earlier this year. No one with give a first (or even a second) for a guy who will be a FA next year and cost nothing.

No need to panic and trade him away for less than we'd get as a compensatory pick.
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010

Last edited by spacecrime; 06-26-2010 at 09:57 PM..
spacecrime is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 09:57 PM   #7
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
patriot lifer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mansfield, Ma
Posts: 1,761
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

the article compares the situation of Leon Washington last year to McNeil, Jackson, and Mankins. I think the moral of the story for Leon Washington was that he should have signed the deal they offered him of $5.5 million per year, not hold out longer than he did.
__________________
2013 Season:

Nate Solder (6'8" 320 lbs)
Seabass (6'8" 320 lbs)
Rob Gronkowski (6'6" 265 lbs)
Jake Ballard (6'6" 275 lbs)
Logan Mankins (6'4" 320 lbs) (100% recovered)
Dan Connolly (6'4" 320 lbs)
Marcus Cannon (6'5" 340 lbs) (Switch to Guard??)

RB: Ridley, Vereen, Washington, Bolden
patriot lifer is offline  
Old 06-26-2010, 10:08 PM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,651
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

For what it's worth, Mankins contract situation does seem totally unfair. I don't think the Pats are trying to take advantage of him, though. I think they really are offering what they think a good young guard is worth.

He might be wiser to analyze that and maximize his position, but he's got a right to feel, because of the league rule, he got a bad deal.

Doubt they could get much for him considering the situation. Sometimes you just have to take the comp pick.
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT
RayClay is offline  
Old 06-27-2010, 06:46 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

I think Cole makes some assumptions that are skewered at best. Like that these players should have presumed themselves to be in line for absolute top of the line deals - or what those deals actually might reasonably be assumed to encompass. Not sure what kind of deals if any AJ was offering his players in SD. In Mankins case however he was offered a deal in the top 5 at his position, $7MAAV, and the top player at his position was only offered $19M in guaranteed money, not the $25M Cole is sputtering about. So that deal and whatever guarantees it entailed and not merely the original tender is what Mankins has walked away from.

Cole is also assuming that the consequences of holding out past week 10 are mitigated by the liklihood that there even is a CBA next season to allow for their becoming UFA whether they earn a year of service credit this season or not, when it's at least as likely there will be either a lockout or a season or three played under rules determined by ownership following a decertification of the union as a result of a CBA impass... And he is totally ignoring the possibility that unfortunate **** sometimes happens to players apart from when they are playing football. Just ask Steve Smith or that young Giants FS because no one ever said life would be fair. Just ask our still young old friend David Givens, who has two championship rings he was instrumental in winning that he now flashes to customers at his smoothie shop.

If I were Mankins I'd stay as far away as I could from my daddy's cows from here on out, and might just baracade myself in a padded room...for fear something happen that precluded me from ever even seeing an offer approaching $35M again... At the end of the day whether for reasons Billick cites or otherwise, there remains a reason no one has held out on a tender in recent memory...

There were in excess of 200 players tendered as RFA this season, largely as a result of the rules changes in an expiring CBA. 9 remain unsigned. This is a little like the angst expressed via the media every off season when roughly a dozen (less that one half of 1%) of the thousands of players in his league suffer the tragic misfortune of being franchise tagged... Pardon the majority of fans if they can't locate their violins at the moment given the state of the national economy and life in the real world. Perhaps some had to pawn theirs to pay their mortgage lest their home be forclosed on...
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 06-27-2010, 06:53 AM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,399
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Restricted Trio May Be Forced to Hold Out

I'm sure the union and the owners will be at loggerheads over the three or so guys who are sitting out the season. The union will want to give them their UFA rights back, and will push for same. Guaranteed.

What is far from guaranteed is that the owners will cave first.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde
Fencer is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best trio in the league? BradyManny Boston Celtics Fan Forum 12 07-31-2007 09:46 PM
Colts WR trio named best in NFL RyanTheColtsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 06-27-2005 08:39 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC