Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Where have I attacked or defended the article itself?
|
So the quoted portion to which I referred was a general bash on those who bash the media or represents some display akin to Tourette's syndrome in a thread about this article? Cool. Your quote. You know best what you meant by it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
It's "verified" that Silver has had at least one close source to Brady in the past. He's claiming that his information was from a close source. You're still bashing.
|
Define a "close" source. If you take that as a factual basis, you must read every article in the news as gospel for the truth. I explained my issue with the article. I am bashing the use of some generic statement from an unidentified source that invites speculation on who that source really is and then other authors speculating on what appears to be original speculation. I am not bashing the opinion itself. I thought the
National Enquirer reference would clue you in to that fact. As the beacon of light in objectivity that you suggest you are by your outrage, try not to slant my response to suit your argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Unnamed sources are used all the time, by sleaze magazines and by the most respected media outlets in the business.
|
I am aware of the concept of confidential sources, but thanks for the journalism lesson. The degree of confidence of a reader in a source is usually proportional to the level of detail provided in the story. What did this "source" actually say? "[S]ome people close to Brady feel the organization isn’t displaying much urgency toward ensuring the latter." What does that mean? Is that Brady's opinion about the negotiations or lack thereof? No. The "disconnect" reference is based on the "cool distance" Brady has kept from the team, apparently under the ruse he wanted to spend time with his family rather than at the training facility 24/7. He is "uncomfortable" talking about contract issues because he implicitly is dissatisfied. Frankly, I read Silver and generally like his material, but the factual basis for this article is wanting, and has now spun into national media speculation citing it as a source.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Then, if you 'admit' to this, why the hell would you go about attacking those who say the same damned thing, just because they're in the media and not putting the same rosy gloss on it that you have?
|
Your reading comprehension level must be slipping. My disdain is for the way this particular story has developed. If you read Silver's article and it rings true to you, that's awesome. It is Silver's theory. I can cook up equally plausible but contrary theories, but if that one works for you then roll with it.
I don't bash on articles or authors just because the opinion differs from mine, nor do I believe that every criticism of the Patriots organization and players is unjustified. Tucker's article has literally taken Silver's article to the next level - the Patriots are now "messing" with Brady. That's quite a distance from what the original source apparently stated.