Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PatsSteve1
* I said there's no one I'd rather have doing the FA choosing, but when FA's are signed like Caldwell or Tebucky types, they could go either way. Duds or guys that really help out.
|
All the signings could go either way. Anyway can be a bust or turn to crap befoer your eyes. Or blossom.
Good players lose it. lazy underachieves see the light. Players learn technique. they get motivated after being cut a couple times.
Any player you sign late in FA, after everyone else has passed, is a gamble. But they are cheap, and that is how you build quality depth, by getting quality players cheap, as opposed to signing 10 or 15 UDFAs to fill out the lower third of your roster at $220,000 each, or wahtever the rookie minimum is.
If you hit half great players and half duds for low $$$, you are way ahead of hte game. Youk can cut most of the duds, and the ones you are stuck with are more than compensated for by all the good players you got.
It's when you get conservative and fearful, when you want to make sure that you don't get any duds, that you totally miss out on quality inexpensive palyers.
Was anyone here excited when BB signed David Patten from the Arena league, or Roman Phifer from the old folk's home? Signing Patten looked a lot worse at the time that signing Tebucky Jones does now.
We took a chance on Patten, but we did sign a pair of quality receivers from Phila: CHarles Johnson and Torrance Small. Patten was the gamble, the guy who was likely to be a dud. Instead he was #2, and Johnson and small vanished into the woodwork. That year BB gave 1.5 mil ot CB Terrence Shaw and minimum to OTIS.
You just don't know. You take the losses and duds in stride, acknowledging that they are NOT mistakes, but part of the process.
Don't worry about the Donald Hayes's and Steve Martin's. They are part of the process that nets the Mike Vrabels and Rodney Harrisons.