Coaching Against Our O-Line - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2006, 11:38 AM   #11
Practice Squad
 
PatsSaintsSox's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: `Nawlins via Southie
Posts: 188
Default

With the zone blocking, this isn’t as powerful as in man, but i think running stunts with bigger D-Ends and looping your Athletic/Fast D-Ends would be effective against the pats this year, Matt Light is a great player, but he could still be effected by the leg injury even if he is 100%
PatsSaintsSox is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-07-2006, 01:41 PM   #12
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4
A good question.
I think an important factor is Tom Brady's quick release, pocket presence, and movement. He always knows when the hit is coming, and is able to either dump it off or buy some seconds.

Call me foolish, but I think it's a lost cause to attack a healthy Patriots O-line. I would rather rush 4, have 7 sit back in zone, force Brady to throw underneath a lot, and PUNISH receivers and backs when they caught the ball.

I think with a healthy O-line and Brady's elusiveness, it is not worth trying to blitz or stack the line.

.
Mav, both your posts in this thread are dead on, an excellent strategic job!
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 11:34 PM   #13
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR4
Kaczur still needs more experience
and may have problems at times. I would test him often.
Happily, this testing will help him mature that much quicker.
__________________
Please, God, don't let us ever suck as bad as the 2011 Cowboys did in the Jets opener.
* * * * *
"I got a little shine on and showed you guys a little taste of my speed."

----Vince Wilfork, Jan. 7, 2007
shakadave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 07:07 AM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4
A good question.
I think an important factor is Tom Brady's quick release, pocket presence, and movement. He always knows when the hit is coming, and is able to either dump it off or buy some seconds.

Call me foolish, but I think it's a lost cause to attack a healthy Patriots O-line. I would rather rush 4, have 7 sit back in zone, force Brady to throw underneath a lot, and PUNISH receivers and backs when they caught the ball.

I think with a healthy O-line and Brady's elusiveness, it is not worth trying to blitz or stack the line.

.
I think some teams with the personnel to do it will still blitz heavily. A 4 man rush won't keep Graham and Watson in to block and what DB is going to punish them? Keeping those two busy is key to defending the pass, IMO. Also, there is a perception that you have to try to rush and hit Tommy. If you don't he'll pick you apart.

Also, while many think our O-line was hampered by injuries and their return will make a big difference, I just don't see it. I didn't think we had that much of a drop off due to lesser talent. If anything, co-ordination may have been weaker than with our starters. Count me as one who thinks Dante needs some additions to the gene pool.
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"


``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
jczxohn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 07:58 AM   #15
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,345
Default

I think Pats1 (forgive me if this is the wrong member - all the Pats37-pats55 wind up running together in my head) had done some tape breakdown this past season and he cited instance after instance in which Neal had been the weak link and allowed a lineman through

I take that with a grain of salt because the entire line was stretched thin by injuries -
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 11:06 AM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixPat
I think Pats1 (forgive me if this is the wrong member - all the Pats37-pats55 wind up running together in my head) had done some tape breakdown this past season and he cited instance after instance in which Neal had been the weak link and allowed a lineman through

I take that with a grain of salt because the entire line was stretched thin by injuries -
Neal made his share of mistakes when I broke down series, I just didn't notice the same problems Pats1 did.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 11:20 AM   #17
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Shore of MA
Posts: 160
Default

The old rule of thumb was blitz the average and inexperienced QBs and drop 7 or 8 against the Bradys and Mannings. But last year, teams were blitzing Brady and Manning all year long -- far more often than before -- a whole change of strategy. It would appear that unpredictability has now become the strategy of choice against the best QBs. Would you agree?
teamplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 06:37 PM   #18
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,104
Default Too Late!

[QUOTE= Count me as one who thinks Dante needs some additions to the gene pool.[/QUOTE]


You are a year too late!

Once again BB is a step ahead and augmented Dante's gene pool with a first and third and snagged a injured Gem before San Diego could hide him on their PS.

Without a broken leg, Wesley Britt is a second round pick, and programmed for the drive blocking, mauling, ORT position that establishes the running game and that is the weakest part of our Offensive line. He played some OLT at 'bama,blocking for brady Croyle, so he is not a total loser at pass blocking, but is a much better run blocker, so ORT beckons.

Most teams run right, but the Pats did better going left, before the injuries. Light is a great run blocker for a OLT. Now teams won't know, will they run left? run right?

Dante has already gotten the upgrade to his gene pool.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 07:20 PM   #19
Moderator
 
T-ShirtDynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eating it! (Humble Pie that is)
Posts: 3,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan
You are a year too late!
I'm with you on Big Britt, I've said it before, I've got a funny feeling about this guy... but lets not jinx it by talking too much about him.
T-ShirtDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 07:43 PM   #20
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-ShirtDynasty
I'm with you on Big Britt, I've said it before, I've got a funny feeling about this guy... but lets not jinx it by talking too much about him.
Hope you guys are right about B***t.

Neal, IMO, suffered from the sophomore jinx and will be better this yr.
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"


``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
jczxohn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563