For some reason it has become heressy arround here to not drop to your knees in awe of the Jets and Dolphins. I suspect that is a combination of it being fashionable to be negative about the Patriots because of the entitlement to championships many fans feel, plus the idea that those teams added players at the one position that is most overrated and misunderstood in the NFL-WR.
So help me understand why I keep seeing comments such as
Well, no one wouldn't say the Jets and Dolphins have improve a lot
JETS
Added a WR who is under suspension to an offense that lacks a QB who can get him the ball
Jumbled around their backfield.
Jones-Green-Washington
becomes
Green-MrClassy-Rookie
Now, we could have an argument on both sides but realistically, the most sane argument is that its as likely to worse as it is to be better
Lost the guy who was touted as their best OL until the announcement that he was being cut at which time he became their worst OL

Being replaced by a IAA rookie who has never played G
Traded in one disappointing corner for another
Dumped the S who started most of the time for them
Added an aging 43 DE to play 34 OLB after his own team (and appraently BB as well) didnt want him, and now are rumored to be releasing the starter at the spot with no other apparent replacement
Are rumored to be releasing their best DL (unless you count a guy who plays about 200 snaps a season before wearing out and may never recover fully to what he was)
I don't know where the surefire improvement is. I can defintely see that if the running game takes a step back and they need to rely on Sanchez throwing the ball (thats what heppened when they went from 4-0 to 7-7) the offense is worse no matter how many WRs they add.
MIAMI
Added an ILB and not much else to a 22nd ranked defense that lost its top 2 pass rushers.
Added a good WR that still has to catch passes from Chad Henne.
TBD if Ronnie Brown will be back and effective and without him they were bad.
Regardless of whether you see improvement, decline or stauts quo, it doesnt seem to be a lot of movement in any direction, and they were a LOSING TEAM at 7-9 last year.
Now, since I am not bowing at the alter of negativity I am sure I will receive the well thought out and heavily supported 'your a homer' counter arument. But how about we limit this to the actual facts and reasons and aguments of WHY these teams have clearly and dramatically improved that I seem to not be getting.