04-26-2010, 04:36 PM
|
#28
|
|
Minuteman Target
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,044
|
Re: Michael Smith:Pats Wanted Hardesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW!
Huh? He used a first on a CB, does that mean that our CBs weren't fine? He used a 1st on a RB when we had Corey Dillon- does that mean that Dillon wasn't fine? He used a 2nd on a NT last year, does that mean that Wilfork wasn't fine? He was using 2nds on defensive linemen like Marquise Hill back when we had an absolute dream team put together on the DL.
Bottom line, Belichick picks for talent and likes a stable of RBs. If you think the fact that he liked Hardesty is an indictment of our RBs, then I dunno what to tell you, but I think you're reading way too much into it.
|
Dead right! I read no criticism of Bodden and Butler into the McCourty pick.
In his ideal world, BB would just draft BPA every time. He said once that the team has needs every year at every position. What that means (of course) is that you hope that the needs aren't so much greater at one position that they can't be ignored. Apart from anything else, his as-little-as-possible for needs strategy keeps him inscrutable. You know he loves it when the GM at the other end of the line says "It's Belichick on the phone and he wants to trade. I haven't the slightest go**am idea who's he's after, though."
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]
Still here to learn
|
|
|