ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
You must have snoozed through the Baltimore game. That was a brawl.
which one? the one at the beginning of the season, or when it actually mattered? I watched both of them
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I dunno....watched that one, too....the pats took a physical beating in that one...and needed a little help in the end to win it
Yeah, I'm not sure what part of that game took a physical toll on the Ravens. Neither our defense nor our offense was a beacon of physicality in that game. The Ravens were the team laying the wood, if memory serves me correctly.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ok, you would have taken 09 Brady over 07 or 06 Brady? Just want to make sure we're talking about the same thing here.
No, I must have misunderstood your question. I thought you were comparing him to other teams' quarterbacks from '09.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes
I measure a QB, or any player for that matter, by them doing or not doing what needs to be done when it needs to be done. I'll take a guy who produces mediocre numbers, doesn't make critical mistakes, and finds ways to win over a stat monster who fails when all you need him to do is hold on.
The fact that he's coming off of an injury is irrelevant, what he does on the field is all that matters, if 09 Brady isn't as good as a different Brady his performance isn't magically altered by taking into account that he was injured, whatever his performance is, it is what it is.
Brady wasn't a so-called "stat monster" last season, he was an efficient quarterback who performed well and led the team. I find the arguments against him, including yours, rather vague.
No, I must have misunderstood your question. I thought you were comparing him to other teams' quarterbacks from '09.
Brady wasn't a so-called "stat monster" last season, he was an efficient quarterback who performed well and led the team. I find the arguments against him, including yours, rather vague.
I'm actually not arguing against Brady, I'm arguing against getting to wrapped up in stats that only tell part of the story, a great pass tainted by receiver error is judged on par with an awful pass thrown right into the arms of the DB where the receiver isn't even close to the ball. Hugging certain stats might make someone feel good but I don't understand why they're doing that, especially when it flies in the face of common sense. No one who knows the Patriots would want 09 Brady as their 2nd choice, so why is there the need to point to those stats and proclaims it his 2nd best year?
Long story short I'm just against pounding Kool-Aid, I hope that makes sense.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Some guy "while Brady had a good season statistically he didn't look entirely comfortable and made some questionable, almost unBrady like plays"
Homer "TOM BRADY IS THE BEST QB EVER, SO MUCH BETTER THAN SATAN MANNING (SEE HOW SATAN RHYMES WITH PEYTON) HE IS SO GOOD AND YOU WONT EVEN KNOW HOW GOOD UNTIL HE RETIRES AND YOU SEE HOW BAD WE ARE WITHOUT HIM. HOW DARE YOU QUESTION HIM EVER IT IS WHAT IT IS IN BB WE TRUST"
Nobody is saying he was bad last year. Just that pre-injury Brady probably would have done better
Some guy "while Brady had a good season statistically he didn't look entirely comfortable and made some questionable, almost unBrady like plays"
Homer "TOM BRADY IS THE BEST QB EVER, SO MUCH BETTER THAN SATAN MANNING (SEE HOW SATAN RHYMES WITH PEYTON) HE IS SO GOOD AND YOU WONT EVEN KNOW HOW GOOD UNTIL HE RETIRES AND YOU SEE HOW BAD WE ARE WITHOUT HIM. HOW DARE YOU QUESTION HIM EVER IT IS WHAT IT IS IN BB WE TRUST"
Nobody is saying he was bad last year. Just that pre-injury Brady probably would have done better
Considering that pre-injury Brady set all time single season marks at the quarterback position, that pretty much goes without saying.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Tom Brady's 2nd best year was LAST YEAR!
Linear Mode
