Position groups that DON'T need much new investment - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2010, 09:43 PM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,424
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

K The Pats have a fine young placekicker. They're set there.

LS I guess they're set at longsnapper.

CB Bodden/Butler/Springs/Wilhite/Wheatley should be better than the same guys were last year. Sure, the worst of those could be usefully replaced. But if they stand pat, it's OK.

S Meriweather/Sanders/McGowan/Chung in some order. Ditto. And Arrington is sort of in the DB mix as well, albeit really as a STer.

OT Light/Kaczur/Vollmer/whoever is good enough

QB If we grant that Hoyer is a sufficient backup, and one or the other QB-turned-WR will also be around, we seem fine at QB

One can have useful competition at almost any position, especially ones like CB where one keeps a lot of guys. But if no significant further investment (other than re-signing Brady and so on) goes into those positions this offseason, calamity will not necessarily ensue

Close calls

NT For once, we're deeper on the DL at NT than we are at DE.

Interior OL The Pats have three starters, two aging, and some reserves. Whether more is needed depends on how the reserves are maturing, which is not something that's easy to judge from the outside.

RB They're all aging, injury-prone, and/or inconsistent, but there's a lot of talent and smarts in that group.

KR/PR The Pats have a lot of position players who have done well at returning in the past. But a stellar dedicated returner would be nice.

No way they make this list

P, LB, DE, WR, TE


All those position groups clearly need new talent.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde
Fencer is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-14-2010, 09:48 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
TriplecHamp's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Dirty
Posts: 4,940
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
K The Pats have a fine young placekicker. They're set there.

LS I guess they're set at longsnapper.

CB Bodden/Butler/Springs/Wilhite/Wheatley should be better than the same guys were last year. Sure, the worst of those could be usefully replaced. But if they stand pat, it's OK.

S Meriweather/Sanders/McGowan/Chung in some order. Ditto. And Arrington is sort of in the DB mix as well, albeit really as a STer.

OT Light/Kaczur/Vollmer/whoever is good enough

QB If we grant that Hoyer is a sufficient backup, and one or the other QB-turned-WR will also be around, we seem fine at QB

One can have useful competition at almost any position, especially ones like CB where one keeps a lot of guys. But if no significant further investment (other than re-signing Brady and so on) goes into those positions this offseason, calamity will not necessarily ensue

Close calls

NT For once, we're deeper on the DL at NT than we are at DE.

Interior OL The Pats have three starters, two aging, and some reserves. Whether more is needed depends on how the reserves are maturing, which is not something that's easy to judge from the outside.

RB They're all aging, injury-prone, and/or inconsistent, but there's a lot of talent and smarts in that group.

KR/PR The Pats have a lot of position players who have done well at returning in the past. But a stellar dedicated returner would be nice.

No way they make this list

P, LB, DE, WR, TE


All those position groups clearly need new talent.
Id add RB to the list that need new talent but I agree with most of that, CB is close to call for me, we could deffinantly add some more talent through the 1st or second rounds.
TriplecHamp is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 09:49 PM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,286
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Re: Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
K The Pats have a fine young placekicker. They're set there.

LS I guess they're set at longsnapper.

CB Bodden/Butler/Springs/Wilhite/Wheatley should be better than the same guys were last year. Sure, the worst of those could be usefully replaced. But if they stand pat, it's OK.

S Meriweather/Sanders/McGowan/Chung in some order. Ditto. And Arrington is sort of in the DB mix as well, albeit really as a STer.

OT Light/Kaczur/Vollmer/whoever is good enough

QB If we grant that Hoyer is a sufficient backup, and one or the other QB-turned-WR will also be around, we seem fine at QB

One can have useful competition at almost any position, especially ones like CB where one keeps a lot of guys. But if no significant further investment (other than re-signing Brady and so on) goes into those positions this offseason, calamity will not necessarily ensue

Close calls

NT For once, we're deeper on the DL at NT than we are at DE.

Interior OL The Pats have three starters, two aging, and some reserves. Whether more is needed depends on how the reserves are maturing, which is not something that's easy to judge from the outside.

RB They're all aging, injury-prone, and/or inconsistent, but there's a lot of talent and smarts in that group.

KR/PR The Pats have a lot of position players who have done well at returning in the past. But a stellar dedicated returner would be nice.

No way they make this list

P, LB, DE, WR, TE


All those position groups clearly need new talent.
Chris Hanson is not going anywhere IMO...and I am not talking about the guy who interviews pedophile perverts
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PATRIOTSFANINPA is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 09:54 PM   #4
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
K The Pats have a fine young placekicker. They're set there.
Stil need to lock him up long term.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
LS I guess they're set at longsnapper.
They've got a good one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
CB Bodden/Butler/Springs/Wilhite/Wheatley should be better than the same guys were last year. Sure, the worst of those could be usefully replaced. But if they stand pat, it's OK.
Re-signing Bodden was big, but the other spot won't be locked down until Butler emerges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
S Meriweather/Sanders/McGowan/Chung in some order. Ditto. And Arrington is sort of in the DB mix as well, albeit really as a STer.
Best set position on the team. Wasn't that way two years ago, which is a plus. Good scouting on the McGowan signing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
OT Light/Kaczur/Vollmer/whoever is good enough
Don't forget about LeVoir. For the time being it's set, but ideally you'd like to see another young guy at RT to complement Vollmer at LT long term.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
QB If we grant that Hoyer is a sufficient backup, and one or the other QB-turned-WR will also be around, we seem fine at QB
Still have a handful of years before this position needs significant addressing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
One can have useful competition at almost any position, especially ones like CB where one keeps a lot of guys. But if no significant further investment (other than re-signing Brady and so on) goes into those positions this offseason, calamity will not necessarily ensue

Close calls

NT For once, we're deeper on the DL at NT than we are at DE.
I would put this in the first category, and keep it there even if Brace or Pryor gets moved to DE. Pats usually only carry 1-2 NTs with a DE/NT conversion on the roster, who is usually inactive. Wilfork is locked up long term and there are two young players behind him; position is set.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
Interior OL The Pats have three starters, two aging, and some reserves. Whether more is needed depends on how the reserves are maturing, which is not something that's easy to judge from the outside.
I wouldn't expect them to make any significant investment at this position. As Connolly proved, it is possible to insert an unproven player at the guard position and still get by. Ohrnberger or Bussey could be the next in line at RG. I'm still higher on Koppen than others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
RB They're all aging, injury-prone, and/or inconsistent, but there's a lot of talent and smarts in that group.
I'm in the camp that this position needs to be scrapped and started from the ground up, Faulk withstanding, but this offensive system, for better or worse, does not place a high value on this position. This likely won't happen until after this season, when every player will be a free agent and hopefully there will be a high draft pick ready to step in.

Either way, this position falls into the bottom category in about ten months.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
KR/PR The Pats have a lot of position players who have done well at returning in the past. But a stellar dedicated returner would be nice.
I think Tate is that guy, if he can stay healthy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
No way they make this list

P, LB, DE, WR, TE

All those position groups clearly need new talent.
This is obvious and something the team has yet to address this offseason, aside from the re-signing of Banta-Cain.

I find it hard to believe that Moss will be here past 2010, but even then you still have Welker and Edelman. It's far from being in dire straits, but for the level of emphasis this offensive system places on this position, there is still something lacking.
pats1 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 09:54 PM   #5
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA View Post
Chris Hanson is not going anywhere IMO...and I am not talking about the guy who interviews pedophile perverts
What? Reiss has blogged on multiple occassions that both sides have agreed to go their separate ways. Hanson was statistically one of the worst punters in the league in 2009.
pats1 is offline  
Old 03-14-2010, 10:01 PM   #6
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,286
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Re: Position groups that DON'T need much new investment

Quote:
Originally Posted by pats1 View Post
What? Reiss has blogged on multiple occassions that both sides have agreed to go their separate ways. Hanson was statistically one of the worst punters in the league in 2009.
Hanson is still a part of the team right now...no?

Unless the team looks for a punter in the draft or a JAG P somewhere else
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PATRIOTSFANINPA is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building your own Patriots’ roster depth chart position by position - Week 5 OL MalaysiaPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 13 06-20-2006 12:41 AM
Building your own Patriots’ roster depth chart position by position - Week 4 TE MalaysiaPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 14 06-03-2006 07:52 PM
Building your draft board position by position - week 8: Safety/Special Teams Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 17 04-21-2006 10:45 PM
Building your draft board position by position - week 1: 3-4 Defensive Linemen Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 28 04-21-2006 10:44 PM
Building your draft board position by position - week 2: Offense, Interior Linemen Box_O_Rocks Patriots Draft Talk 19 04-17-2006 09:54 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC