ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Yeah, I broke it all down once, but I don't have the data all in front of me. I had him slotted in the 8-12 range, depending upon how I weighted certain factors. In no particular order, I've got him behind Brady, Starr, Graham, Baugh, Unitas, Montana and Staubach, and in a group with Elway, Young, Favre and Bradshaw.
Shouldnt Aikman be in there?
I also think Bradshaw should be up a notch, and ahead of Staubach. They were contemporaries and Bradshaw won 4 SBs to 2. Bradshaw gets a bad rap because of the defense and the fact that he won one in 74 when he had a bad year, but he became the focal point of the team for the last 2, and was good in 75 too. His stats get killed too, but the game was totally different. Compared to players in his era his stats were good. Compared to QBs after all the rule changes isn't realistic.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Shouldnt Aikman be in there?
I also think Bradshaw should be up a notch, and ahead of Staubach. They were contemporaries and Bradshaw won 4 SBs to 2. Bradshaw gets a bad rap because of the defense and the fact that he won one in 74 when he had a bad year, but he became the focal point of the team for the last 2, and was good in 75 too. His stats get killed too, but the game was totally different. Compared to players in his era his stats were good. Compared to QBs after all the rule changes isn't realistic.
i don't think i ever say aikman choke esp. in a big game. 3 super bowls in 4 years is amazing and he is probably the most accurate qb in NFL history.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"He’s the greatest quarterback to ever play the game. He goes from being a rookie that nobody is expecting anything from, to taking over with people saying he can’t do it, to winning three Super Bowls....It should already be obvious he’s the greatest quarterback to ever have played. "
Shouldnt Aikman be in there?
I also think Bradshaw should be up a notch, and ahead of Staubach. They were contemporaries and Bradshaw won 4 SBs to 2. Bradshaw gets a bad rap because of the defense and the fact that he won one in 74 when he had a bad year, but he became the focal point of the team for the last 2, and was good in 75 too. His stats get killed too, but the game was totally different. Compared to players in his era his stats were good. Compared to QBs after all the rule changes isn't realistic.
This sort of ranking certainly doesn't have a 100% "right/wrong" capabillity. Having said that, and just giving out my opinion on the subjects:
1.) I'm not sure Aikman is even in my top 20 QB. I'd have to break it down further. Guys like Tarkenton, Tittle, Marino and Fouts come into play at that point.
2.) When you match Staubach up to Bradshaw in a head-to-head, you've got to remember that Staubach missed about 5 years due to military service and didn't even get into the league until he was a 27 year old rookie. That certainly impacts longevity awards and gives Bradshaw an edge in years played, as well as robbing Staubach of some peak physical years.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
This isn't a commentary on Reiss. However, the way the media is already reacting (by retracting the "Manning GOAT" assertion after he choked tonight) is exactly what I've been complaining about for the past two weeks. The media is about as fickle as it gets, latching onto the Flavor of the Month. I really just wish everyone would wait until these two retire to compare them and then decide who is the best.
The media is a bunch of clueless fickle biatches. It is fun when for one night their bs sounds like what most of us have said all along. At least for tonight, we can enjoy it.
__________________ 16-0? Yup I called it: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
This sort of ranking certainly doesn't have a 100% "right/wrong" capabillity. Having said that, and just giving out my opinion on the subjects:
1.) I'm not sure Aikman is even in my top 20 QB. I'd have to break it down further. Guys like Tarkenton, Tittle, Marino and Fouts come into play at that point.
2.) When you match Staubach up to Bradshaw in a head-to-head, you've got to remember that Staubach missed about 5 years due to military service and didn't even get into the league until he was a 27 year old rookie. That certainly impacts longevity awards and gives Bradshaw an edge in years played, as well as robbing Staubach of some peak physical years.
Aikman has 3 rings, and he played flawlessly in earning them.
He wasn't asked to put up gaudy numbers, so I don't hold that against him. What he did was win.
Staubach/Bradshaw probably accentuates the subjective nature of this kind of argument. I'm looking at accomplishments, and ignoring factors that diminish the results, and you are putting more thought into what if.
Not that either is right or wrong, which is why this kind of debate is hard to get agreement in, since the criteria of 'best' is not fully defined.
Aikman has 3 rings, and he played flawlessly in earning them.
He wasn't asked to put up gaudy numbers, so I don't hold that against him. What he did was win.
Staubach/Bradshaw probably accentuates the subjective nature of this kind of argument. I'm looking at accomplishments, and ignoring factors that diminish the results, and you are putting more thought into what if.
Not that either is right or wrong, which is why this kind of debate is hard to get agreement in, since the criteria of 'best' is not fully defined.
Just an FYI. I don't do any "what if" about Staubach, because I don't think it's necessary. I simply noted it as a reality and something that has to be acknowledged. He was a better QB than Bradshaw, IMO, DESPITE missing those 5 years. The significance of that time is in regards to career numbers, since Bradshaw was able to play more years as a result.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
So.... when do I get to see the commercial where a little boy materializes and whispers, "Porter" to Peyton?
Lol. Somebody put together a Youtube clip of that. Having the little kid whisper "Wayne" to Manning and then showing the pick 6 would be pretty funny too.
Re: Reiss says it all...Peyton is no Brady!!
Linear Mode
