Esiason on D&C: Jets roster has surpassed Pats - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums

***Rob0729*** · 01-25-2010, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanAngeloState

Faneca vs. Mankins? OK, that's close

Not really. Mankins is far better than Faneca. Welcome to 2010. Faneca may have been the weak point of the Jets' o-line

Quote:

Light vs. Ferguson?? Well??

Light is pretty much on par with Ferguson, but he was injury plagued this year.

Quote:

How about Harris vs. the wrecked knee (hopefully he comes back) Mayo?

Did you see Harris last year? He was worse than Mayo this year with his knee injury.

Quote:

Cotchery vs. Aiken?

Yeah, but Welker is much better than David Clowney. C'mon, you are going to compare the Jets' starting WR with the Pats' #4 WR? Of course, a starter is better than someone who is #4 on the depth chart.

Quote:

I mean no offense, but come on...you can still be a Pats fan if you admit that they are better at a few positions.

Well, eventhough I agree with you, you might want to actually learn a little about each team's roster before you comment.

***SanAngeloState*** · 01-25-2010, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer

No, you just display all the symptoms of a klinefan-esque troll, and, thus, your contributions are of little interest.

Well Esiason said it to start with, is he a troll?

And I said that Brady was NOT inferior to Sanchez or Sanchize however you like to spell it.

102 Pat · 01-25-2010, 02:36 PM

Get used to this Pats fans. Just because the Jest got farther than us in the playoffs, there will lots of talk from all the media all off-season about how there better, yada, yada, yada...

JackBauer · 01-25-2010, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanAngeloState

Well Esiason said it to start with, is he a troll?

And I said that Brady was NOT inferior to Sanchez or Sanchize however you like to spell it.

Way to completely miss the point.

The issue is not Esiason's remarks; he's certainly entitled to his opinion, however misguided it may be.

***Leave No Doubt*** · 01-25-2010, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sivy

How are they better? Its not even close. The patriots lost to them when they were banged up and it was a close game...a less rust brady and a healthy welker and the game wasnt close. The pats finished the regular season with a better record, and won the division. And before you say it, no, the playoffs dont matter because the jets got a free ticket into them.

Thank you, too.

This is going to be one long-***** offseason

emoney_33 · 01-25-2010, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 102 Pat

Get used to this Pats fans. Just because the Jest got farther than us in the playoffs, there will lots of talk from all the media all off-season about how there better, yada, yada, yada...

The team that LET them win in the regular season just crushed them in the playoffs. They were really an 8-8 team, they can talk all they want.

D-Money · 01-25-2010, 02:43 PM

They have surpass this team when it comes to the defensive scheme.They have a shutdown CB.

emoney_33 · 01-25-2010, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D-Money

They have surpass this team when it comes to the defensive scheme.They have a shutdown CB.

Brady put up 31 on them.

D-Money · 01-25-2010, 02:49 PM

They still had the number 1 defense at the end of the day.They are more creative then our team on the defensive side of the ball.

***patsfaninpittsburgh*** · 01-25-2010, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D-Money

They still had the number 1 defense at the end of the day.They are more creative then our team on the defensive side of the ball.

Yeah the "#1 defense" that gave up 5 or 6 game losing drives. Real clutch.

I don't know what's worse, no Super Bowl or the idiots that have invaded this site.