YES - New CBA Agreement Close - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2006, 09:13 PM   #21
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fgssand
Thanks for the thought. But there never was any doubt that there would be a salary cap in 2006. Will there be a Collective Bargaining Agreement extension in time to cover 2007? THAT is why we're on tenterhooks.

95 million is the number which implies ... no extension.
__________________
- - - Leading the division by 2+ games - - -
flutie2phelan is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-26-2006, 09:38 PM   #22
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,564
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flutie2phelan
Thanks for the thought. But there never was any doubt that there would be a salary cap in 2006. Will there be a Collective Bargaining Agreement extension in time to cover 2007? THAT is why we're on tenterhooks.

95 million is the number which implies ... no extension.
The last paragraph said there's a very good chance the CBA will get done so that's good news, unless it ends up being false.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 10:25 PM   #23
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
fgssand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 4,650
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flutie2phelan
Thanks for the thought. But there never was any doubt that there would be a salary cap in 2006. Will there be a Collective Bargaining Agreement extension in time to cover 2007? THAT is why we're on tenterhooks.

95 million is the number which implies ... no extension.

You must have skimmed - from Fox

"These same sources told Scout.com that members of one NFL organization are telling their staff that there is a very strong chance the Collective Bargaining Agreement will be extended by the March 3 deadline."
fgssand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 11:29 PM   #24
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fgssand
You must have skimmed - from Fox

"These same sources told Scout.com that members of one NFL organization are telling their staff that there is a very strong chance the Collective Bargaining Agreement will be extended by the March 3 deadline."
You are correct. I read Fox and skipped the scout.coms. Earlier they had been posted, and i thought i knew their gist. Yes, the Scout reports certainly are upbeat.

But a CBA extension has been associated with an '06 cap over 100 million. So, when we read of a probably 95 mil cap, it isn't the "high end of the estimates" that grabs me ... but rather that the estimate isn't adding anything for a Designated Revenues expansion.
__________________
- - - Leading the division by 2+ games - - -
flutie2phelan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2006, 12:03 AM   #25
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,643
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flutie2phelan
You are correct. I read Fox and skipped the scout.coms. Earlier they had been posted, and i thought i knew their gist. Yes, the Scout reports certainly are upbeat.

But a CBA extension has been associated with an '06 cap over 100 million. So, when we read of a probably 95 mil cap, it isn't the "high end of the estimates" that grabs me ... but rather that the estimate isn't adding anything for a Designated Revenues expansion.
Flutie2Phelan - Well, lets remember that this is an extension, meaning that it would start at the end of the 2007/2008 season, unless they wrote it in such a way to replace the 2 years remaining on the current CBA. So, that is why they could be saying that the 95 million is where the cap would be, since the new monies wouldn't apply until the 2007 or 2008 seasons.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2006, 09:14 AM   #26
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New England USA
Posts: 916
Default i suspect each of you is correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz
Flutie2Phelan - Well, lets remember that this is an extension, meaning that it would start at the end of the 2007/2008 season, unless they wrote it in such a way to replace the 2 years remaining on the current CBA. So, that is why they could be saying that the 95 million is where the cap would be, since the new monies wouldn't apply until the 2007 or 2008 seasons.
i don't what actual words McKay spoke in the phone call, or the press conference, or whatever. But whatever those specific words are, they indicate something very specific to the owners.
there's no need to engage in this eastern-thought parlor game, but it frees the union to say "we accept" to the owners' people on a face-to-face basis, and, yes, saves face. the language will appear in the contract and no one will comment on it. then gene goes back and tries to explain it to the players.
to explain the parlor game--it shows up language in the WW 1 treaty and in the korean and and ww 11 treaties, that but it takes a very long time.

Last edited by ilduce06410; 02-27-2006 at 09:15 AM..
ilduce06410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC