ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Fluffy piece about teams holding back against teams they will face in first round of playoffs.
Notable for one random last paragraph:
Quote:
A Hard Year Ahead
Brutal schedule watch, 2010: the Patriots. They will host the Colts in their annual throwdown, but they will also have Minnesota, Green Bay, Cincinnati and Baltimore at home, and San Diego and Pittsburgh on the road. And, of course, they will play two games against the Jets.
__________________ Ice_Ice_Brady writes:
The difference is that Brady calmly calls audibles while Manning flaps like a chicken, barks 11 code words, and makes sure every camera in the stadium has documented his once-in-a-generation (and patented, I believe) ability to see a defensive formation and change the play. Both have the same effect, but Manning transcends measurable human intellect while Brady merely chooses a different play.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: NY Times: Secrets kept last week may lead to victories this week
Yes, it's about time we have a home game against Indy. Three in a row in that sissydome is enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTibbs
The NFL will make sure that is a September, October game. They won't want Manning standing outside in the cold you know.
__________________ Ice_Ice_Brady writes:
The difference is that Brady calmly calls audibles while Manning flaps like a chicken, barks 11 code words, and makes sure every camera in the stadium has documented his once-in-a-generation (and patented, I believe) ability to see a defensive formation and change the play. Both have the same effect, but Manning transcends measurable human intellect while Brady merely chooses a different play.
Re: NY Times: Secrets kept last week may lead to victories this week
I fully expect Philly and Cincinnati to look a helluva lot better this week than they did last week. NE I'm not sure what to think. Arizona will probably do better but I still expect the Packers to beat them again.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: NY Times: Secrets kept last week may lead to victories this week
That is a horrible schedule. Everyone of those teams is a 50-50 situation.
Unless the PATs improve a lot I would expect at least 4 losses. from those
8 games. From the remaining 8 games I would not be surprised for a 6-2 record.
Doing well the PATs may be looking at a 10-6 season. It really depends
on what happens in the off season concerning all the moves these teams make.
Re: NY Times: Secrets kept last week may lead to victories this week
The Colts game won't be in December, but it won't be in September either. The networks want that held back every year until Nielson does their ratings sweep, which is usually sometime in November.
Way too early to figure out if a schedule is good or bad. Every year teams make big jumps up and big jumps down due to free agency and injuries. In 2008 the Steelers had the toughest schedule in the NFL and won the Super Bowl; then in 2009 their schedule was the easiest based on their opponents' records from the year before but they missed the playoffs entirely.
Right now it looks like five games that should be definite wins (Bills, Bills, Browns, Bears and Lions) with eleven that could go either way, but that could drastically change by next fall. I don't know that it looks that much harder than most past seasons at this point in the year. If I looked at the 2009 schedule one year ago today I would have said there were only four or five definite wins and eleven or twelve that could go either way also. The 2009 schedule had seven games against teams that went to the playoffs the previous year, and six more against teams that just missed the playoffs.