12-29-2009, 04:14 PM
|
#9
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
|
Re: Most wins in the 00 decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
I keep hearing, seeing and reading about how the Colts have the most wins in this decade.
That is not correct.
The Colts have 115 REG SEASON wins, The Pats have 112.
The Colts have 7 post-season wins, the Pats have 14.
So the Pats have 126 wins this decade to 122 for the Colts.
Are we seriously supposed to judge wins by ignoring the postseason?
And for some reason NO ONE who makes this comment has ever clarified that it is regular season and the answer changes if you include post-season.
|
All this discussion is only by media people desperate to generate a controversy over who is the team of the decade. They were hoping that the Steelers would be more of legitimate Super Bowl contender at this point so they could argue that if the Steelers won the Super Bowl this year, that they have a legitimate right to the Team of the Decade crown. Since there is much doubt whether the Steelers even make the playoffs, the media has to hang their hat on the Colts since they will win the Team of Regular Season for this Decade.
The thing is the media have now backed off this story since they used the caveot that Indy would be forgiven one less Super Bowl win and two less Super Bowl appearances if they went 19-0. But that ain't going to happen. Now they have the whole story of the backlash due to Caldwell pulling the starters, I think this whole debate will go away unless the Colts win the Super Bowl.
The team of the decade thing is really BS anyway. There is no trophy for it. It isn't an official award. It is a media creation. I don't care. Whether the Pats are or aren't considered the team of this decade, it doesn't take away their accomplishments.
|
|
|