Idle thoughts...pregame - defense - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2009, 06:26 AM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
patfanken's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canton MA
Posts: 4,901
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

....its a good thing that this game is on in the evening so I have enough to time to pontificate and still be relevant.

For the first time in a LONG time the Pats will come at the Colts with enough quality DBs to have a chance to really confuse Manning, and his kind of undermanned receiver corps. Here are the facts.

The good news is that Collie and Pierre Garcon are coming back to earth. There real threats outside are STILL Clark and Wayne. Also the Colts running game is worse than the Pats. The bad news is that bad news is that Manning is having his best year of his career. Good enough that he's lifted the 28th ranked rushing attack to the point where the Colts lead the league in total offense. Think about THAT. He's been THAT good.

So how are the Pats going to attack the top ranked offense on their home field in front of 70, 000 odd liquored up Hoosiers. Here are a few thought.

1. I can be said that over the years the Pats offense has morphed into the Colts offense. Well THIS year, it can be said that the Pats DEFENSE has morphed into the Colts D....to a certain extent. That extent is that more than likely we will attack the Colts with a 4-3 look that will rely MORE on speed than bulk. In this scenario, the Pats like up with 2 big guys (Warren and Wilfolk in the middle, with 2 undersized DEs (Burgess and TBC). Now THAT would be very Colt like.

2. Now in reality the Colt defense is morphing more into the Pats D. In the past the Colts would be very vanilla, lining up in a Tampa 2 almost every play. It was the polar opposite of the Pats. Dungy believed that if a player lined up in the same position all the time, there would be less likely for him to make mental mistakes, AND as the game went along he'd react better to what was in front of him BECAUSE he's seen it all day from the same position. Dungy was able win a lot of games with this because his complexity came up front with the front seven, while he remained mistake free in the secondary. This year with a new DC, the Colts are using more man to man, hybrids and blitz packages. But I digress....

3. Common wisdom states that, like with Brady, you Blitz Manning at your own peril. That is why I was thinking that 4-3 package with TBC and Burgess you get our best outside pressure rush, while Warren/Wright/Wilfolk push the middle. IMHO, this is the CRITICAL strategy. I've always thought that getting pressure up the middle was the key, even more than off the edge. Pressure up the middle forces Manning to move his feet and throw off rhythm

4. Nw you can drop 7 back into coverage and keep the game in front of you.

5. Now the Pats can do a couple of things here, and most assuredly they will do all that I suggest and more. I doubt very much if Manning will get the same coverage 2 plays in a row.

6. Lets take a look at one coverage I'm sure we'll see. That would be to lock on in man to man coverage underneath (4 across) with 3 deep safeties. Manning like Brady has made a living on the short pass this year. In fact the key to Manning's improvement over the last few years, is that he's become more patient, and less likely to give up the short sure pass to go for the bundle. I suggest cutting off that short pass option and lure him into throwing deep balls into our deep S coverage. And frankly for the first time in years, I like our match ups.

So lets assume a 3 wide formation with Collie in the slot Clark at TE, with Garcon and Wayne on the outside. Underneath I'd lock on the receivers with Boddin on Wayne, Butler on Garcon, Willhite on Collie, and Springs on Clark. Yes I know that everyone assumes it will be McGowan on Clark, but Clark is more of a true WR who pushes around DBs when they are assigned to him, while outrunning LBs. In this scenerio you have a bigger CB who isn't easily pushed around, but who has CB skills to cover. Behind them you have 3 guys who are looking to jump receivers who look to have beaten the underneath coverage. By having 3 guys behind the underneath coverage you kill the seam routes that Clark loves, and have deep protection on the WRs

OK if you are set on McGowan covering Clark, you can switch him and put Springs back at S or even Chung. BTW- the Pats don't just come out and lock on, they do it on the snap of the ball. Now Peyton has to go to his 2nd and 3rd reads because his usual dump off pass isn't there. Switching this D up with a 4 under Zone can be really confusing and 3 deep.

7. Now the Pats can also go with an old favorite, which is the 5 under zone and 2 deep. THIS is the D that got Ty Law all his picks. Here the CB looks like he's in zone, but has over the top help, so he can fall back into the play when Manning tries to hit the deep out INFRONT of the rotating S. It also puts pressure on the short route that Manning likes so much. Having 5 under ALSO means he'd be throwing slants into a lot of traffic, and of course it kills the screen game. This is more of a first and 10 or 3rd and 7+ D

8. Up front, again, pushing the middle is more important than rushing the DE's. I DON'T want to spend all day watching Burgess and TBC running past Manning drops to the outside. I WANT to see him throw on the run. So when the Pats Blitz, I want to see that double A gap blitz up the middle. I want to see that delayed S blitz up the middle. See the pattern here. UP THE MIDDLE thats the key word.

I want the DE's to really sqeeze Manning with power moves inside. I want to see them halt their up field rush when they get as deep as the drop and squeeze. Manning is one QB I don't mind breaking contain so I would take more risks in my outside rushes.

9. I can't help but remember the 2003 strategy when the Pats put Jarvis Green over the C and he overpowered Saturday in the Middle and a had a career day being in Manning's face. This would have been a perfect spot for Seymour this game, and the first time I will really miss him. Could Pryor fill that bill. He looks like he can be explosive up the middle. So has Matt Wright. So this also could be a strategy from the 3-4 look. Relieving any run responsibility for the nose and letting him push the middle while occupying the G with bluff blitzs by the LBs

10. Finally I'm sure we will see a lot of 3 Safety looks, with McGowan, Merriweather, Chung, with Springs rotating in as a S at times.

BOTTOM LINE so many possible looks with so many possible personell packages. Its a nice feeling to think we have so many options for a change, because IMHO THAT is what will keep Manning off the board

For that reason, I think we have to fake the blitz a lot more than we actually use it.

11. Worry points. The fast no huddle. That would be what I would use to keep the Pats from substituting at will. Secondly the running game. Addai hasn't been much of a threat on the ground this year (though he's been a good receiving threat), but Donald Brown would seem to present a more serious threat, and he's back. I worry about that.
patfanken is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-15-2009, 07:32 AM   #2
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

I just have to say that if Springs is matched up with Clark it's going to be a long night. Springs will get eaten up. This is just my opinion but I think there need to be an assortment of people covering him all night long with help from a safety.
__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers
MrBigglesWorth is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 07:44 AM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

Nice thoughts.

I think we play a place 3-3-5 with 3 safeties. McGowan can be the primary guy to shadow Clark. I think Chung will play intimidator over the middle, but can also come up and blitz. I'm with you about not going overboard on blitzing Manning, but I think we can throw a lot of different looks at him with fake blitzes, and I think Chung is the guy to let loose from time to time. One hit like he put on Chad Henne last week and Manning will be a different QB.

I love the idea of penetration up the middle. It's the fastest way to get to Manning, and anything that flushes him out of the pocket is good. I wouldn't mind seeing a front 3 with Warren and Wilfork at DE and Pryor in the middle.

I think BB will take away Clark and Wayne to a reasonable degree (doubt we totally shut them down) and make Manning beat us with Garcon and Collie. I don't think he can do that with our DBs if we get decent pressure on them, and I don't think they have enough of a run game to really hurt us.

I don't think Manning has seen a secondary like Butler-Bodden-Chung-McGowan-Meriweather in a long time. I hope Bodden plays a lot of press on Wayne and bumps him off his routes. I'm hoping to see Butler and Meriweather jump a few routes and hopefully come away with a couple of picks.

Bump Manning's primary guys, double down on Clark with McGowan shadowing him, and put some pressure on Peyton with hopefully a few hard hits. Change things around a bit so that he can't get too much in a rhythm and beat him up, and I think we will control the game.

Like you I'm worried about the hurry up. If I were the Colts I would plan on using it until proven otherwise.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 08:15 AM   #4
JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,449
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
I don't think Manning has seen a secondary like Butler-Bodden-Chung-McGowan-Meriweather in a long time.
Don't discount Wilhite. He's a pretty good CB (#1 or #2 most days).

This Secondary is the best the Colts will see, imo and if they can't get it done, props to the Colts.

I think our low points allowed average will stay in tact tonight.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 10:48 AM   #5
SVN
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,221
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

i think how the 3rd and 4th WR are defended will be a key against the colts like collie and garson. if either of those two work well for colts in the short passing game then stopping clark may not be enough.
SVN is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:08 AM   #6
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,560
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

Like I said in the thread yesterday, I expect (or morelike, I would play) 3 CB and 3 S as the base defense. It would alleviate some of the substitution concerns because that's enough DBs to play good pass coverage but with Chung and McGowan, I think they can do a creditable job as LB in running situations. This Dime defense, IMO, could stay on the field a full drive without needing massive subs. Argue how you will about who the others should be (Thomas vs. Guyton, Warren vs. Burgess, etc) but a DB group of Bodden-Butler-Wilhite-Meriweather-McGowan-Chung really works for me in this matchup.
BelichickFan is online now  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:31 AM   #7
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patspsycho's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 20 minutes from Foxboro
Posts: 9,930
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
Like I said in the thread yesterday, I expect (or morelike, I would play) 3 CB and 3 S as the base defense. It would alleviate some of the substitution concerns because that's enough DBs to play good pass coverage but with Chung and McGowan, I think they can do a creditable job as LB in running situations. This Dime defense, IMO, could stay on the field a full drive without needing massive subs. Argue how you will about who the others should be (Thomas vs. Guyton, Warren vs. Burgess, etc) but a DB group of Bodden-Butler-Wilhite-Meriweather-McGowan-Chung really works for me in this matchup.
Who would you assign the 3rd CB to??
Patspsycho is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:33 AM   #8
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,560
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Idle thoughts...pregame - defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patspsycho View Post
Who would you assign the 3rd CB to??
Colts usually have 3 WR, that's where my 3 CB go on passing downs. McGowan on Clark, that leaves a LB to look at Addai out of the backfield and two Safeties to help generally on Clark and Wayne.
BelichickFan is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Idle thoughts...pregame patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 38 11-15-2009 03:14 PM
Idle thoughts... patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 39 11-02-2007 03:13 PM
more idle thoughts... patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 11-01-2007 11:00 PM
idle pregame thoughts... patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 01-20-2007 11:27 AM
idle thoughts patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 23 12-22-2006 10:04 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC