Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2009, 10:29 AM   #1
JSn
Canada's Wicked Hosah!
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,096
Default Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Reiss' breakdowns of formations and groupings is just awesome.

Things that stuck out to me:

Sam Aiken plays more WR snaps (51) than Welker (50) or Moss (45) and scored the first TD of his 7 year NFL career. I think he's becoming a legit part of this offense, though he'll probably get squeezed for playing time by...

Brandon Tate. ONE WEEK off of the PUP list, not only did Tate return some kicks, but played 23 snaps at WR. 23 snaps?? Not only that, but I'd have to say that the kid could have made some big plays if he was a first or second read, he seems to manage separation fairly easily.

Hoyer gets his second week of mop-up duty (and may there be many more) and looked pretty good. Is our back-up QB more poised than some of the starters in this league? At any rate, it's becoming clearer how he stole the job from O'Connell and Walter.

Ben Watson grabs another TD. Is it possible that on this pace, he becomes a name-brand Tight End by season's end? Another couple of good games and I'd get this guy extended. He's really showing up in the passing game and his blocking is already better than several big name TE's.

We've talked at great length about the defense, and they look great. But this offense is slowly re-tooling before our very eyes.

The run game seems to need work, but I have to think the run didn't feel very important to those drawing up the game-plan. I'd like to see more 2 RB sets, but maybe that's going to have to wait for Taylor and Morris to trickle back in. The ground game is going to be important in keeping the passing game alive now that "training camp" is over.

Below are Reiss links for personnel groupings and snaps played on offense.

New England Patriots Blog - Patriots used varied offensive packages - ESPN Boston

New England Patriots Blog - Downs played by offensive personnel - ESPN Boston
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-26-2009, 10:42 AM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,024
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSn View Post
Reiss' breakdowns of formations and groupings is just awesome.

Things that stuck out to me:

Sam Aiken plays more WR snaps (51) than Welker (50) or Moss (45) and scored the first TD of his 7 year NFL career. I think he's becoming a legit part of this offense, though he'll probably get squeezed for playing time by...
No offense to Sam, but I still think the guy is just a healthy body at this point. He's more reliable than Galloway - which doesn't say much - and Tate (at this point in time, which also doesn't say much). Aiken is not much of a route runner, doesn't get much separation, and isn't very quick. He is fast & big, and is almost like a tight end in a way. His TD was a great play, but let's put it this way - in an ideal situation, Aiken only plays special teams and never sees the field on offense.
BradyManny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 10:45 AM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seacoast NH
Posts: 9,990
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

My take...
Amazing to see the # of plays Tate had out there. Obviously he'd impressed the coaches with his knowlege of the playbook.

Slater 4 plays at WR. Just when we had the ST ace pegged as a safety. Versitile or simply searching for SOMETHING he can actually do besides STs. Heh.

Baker more plays than Watson. Probably for pass protection. Noticed him helping SeaBass on the pass rush.

Agree that Watson is contributing well this season.

Aiken ran the WR screen exceptionally well. Watched him 'sell' the psss route, then step back and run the screen. GREAT job runing the route.
__________________
Kraft 2010: "It's definitely not a doomsday scenario, it might have to happen to get things right. I hope it's the vehicle to get us a deal. I hope it's the ultimate hammer.''
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:13 AM   #4
JSn
Canada's Wicked Hosah!
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,096
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

That would be true if he was playing 30 snaps a game, but I think he's turning into a reliable passing option and he obviously brings great blocking to the screen game as well. I think Tate and Edelman as he returns will relegate Sam to an occasional WR, which probably makes him more effective on STs, but after the last couple of games, I can't downplay him as an "emergencies only" player on O. He seems like a solid YAC guy as long as he isn't targeted too often.

Slater at WR even 4 times did surprise me. I still don't get how that kid's elbow isn't messed up.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:21 AM   #5
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,033
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

BTW kudos to Reiss, (he's the best, and will be...until he catches the media "its all about me" disease) Those stats are so very informative to real football fans. It tells us more about stuff we can't possibly absorb just watching the game. IMHO they should be part of the main story every time, rather than just a random blog entry that someone has to struggle to find.

Again, good stuff Mike, and Thanks for posting it JSN
patfanken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:22 AM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,024
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSn View Post
That would be true if he was playing 30 snaps a game, but I think he's turning into a reliable passing option and he obviously brings great blocking to the screen game as well. I think Tate and Edelman as he returns will relegate Sam to an occasional WR, which probably makes him more effective on STs, but after the last couple of games, I can't downplay him as an "emergencies only" player on O. He seems like a solid YAC guy as long as he isn't targeted too often.

Slater at WR even 4 times did surprise me. I still don't get how that kid's elbow isn't messed up.
I certainly agree about the blocking - but how is he a reliable passing option at this point? Like you said, he was out there for 50 snaps - he caught one ball, and it was on a broken play.

For instance, if we still had Gaffney, I doubt Aiken would see the field at all save for a few wideout screens and a few plays to block. He's only caught 41% of the passes thrown his way this season, and he currently had a -47% DVOA going into yesterday. In short, he might be an OK fill-in, but he's a very unproductive wide receiver, and its an area that needs to be improved upon by Tate & Edelman.
BradyManny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:28 AM   #7
JSn
Canada's Wicked Hosah!
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,096
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344 View Post
I certainly agree about the blocking - but how is he a reliable passing option at this point? Like you said, he was out there for 50 snaps - he caught one ball, and it was on a broken play.

For instance, if we still had Gaffney, I doubt Aiken would see the field at all save for a few wideout screens and a few plays to block. He's only caught 41% of the passes thrown his way this season, and he currently had a -47% DVOA going into yesterday. In short, he might be an OK fill-in, but he's a very unproductive wide receiver, and its an area that needs to be improved upon by Tate & Edelman.
I'm not positive we're disagreeing. Maybe we are?

I'd need to see a comparison of targets to drops, but I bet they're similar to Moss. (Welker has a deal with some evil being for stick-um to ooze from his pores)

I also agree about Gaffney, and that's likely been the most noticeable loss from last year, personnel-wise... which is weird when you think about who's moved on. Still I think we're about a game better than many predicted us to be entering the bye in the pre-season and hopefully Edelman and Tate will come in and be difference makers. Imagine if we could effectively limit Moss' reps a bit, making him MORE effective?

There's also some piece of mind knowing we have another WR who has at least shown signs of being ready/willing/able on the P-Squad.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:36 AM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,024
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSn View Post
I'm not positive we're disagreeing. Maybe we are?

I'd need to see a comparison of targets to drops, but I bet they're similar to Moss. (Welker has a deal with some evil being for stick-um to ooze from his pores)

I also agree about Gaffney, and that's likely been the most noticeable loss from last year, personnel-wise... which is weird when you think about who's moved on. Still I think we're about a game better than many predicted us to be entering the bye in the pre-season and hopefully Edelman and Tate will come in and be difference makers. Imagine if we could effectively limit Moss' reps a bit, making him MORE effective?

There's also some piece of mind knowing we have another WR who has at least shown signs of being ready/willing/able on the P-Squad.
I don't think we are disagreeing very much at all - I perhaps just feel a little more sense of urgency to see Tate & Edelman ultimately step up and replace Aiken by the time winter rolls around and the big games come up.

Aiken is only credited with 1 drop this season - I feel like I've seen more than that, but I guess a drop is a little subjective. In terms of targets caught, Moss has caught 64% and Welker is at 74% (not sure if those #s include yesterday yet). I'd sum it up this way - Aiken has some clear strengths, but also some clear weaknesses, and I'd generally prefer our #3 to be a more well rounded player.

I, for one, sold Gaffney's worth short. I thought we could replace him pretty easily, and I was mistaken. In hindsight, I'd love to have a solid - albeit unspectacular - player like that back.

Last edited by BradyManny; 10-26-2009 at 11:37 AM.
BradyManny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:50 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,654
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

In the end, stats and reps don't matter on a fan board. What matters is our own perceptions, biases and binkies. Most posters will simply ignore the fact that Aiken is looking better every week and had more reps than Welker.

Personally, I think that Brady and Belichick are fine with Aiken as the #3 receiver, although they are more than happy if one of the rooks beats him out for reps.

I think that it is extremely likely that Tate will develop enough in the next few weeks that he will be a solid #3/#4 receivers as well as a solid kick returner. We should should all note that this is Edelman's job description. Aiken will always be active as a returner.

Barring injuries, I believe the eventual choice for the active roster will be between Tate and Edelman. I suspect that Tate will use his time well and will be the choice, even when Edelman is healthy.
mgteich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:57 AM   #10
Destroy! Enjoy!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flawda
Posts: 7,512
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: Offensive Personnel Stuff: Interesting notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
In the end, stats and reps don't matter on a fan board. What matters is our own perceptions, biases and binkies. Most posters will simply ignore the fact that Aiken is looking better every week and had more reps than Welker.

Personally, I think that Brady and Belichick are fine with Aiken as the #3 receiver, although they are more than happy if one of the rooks beats him out for reps.

I think that it is extremely likely that Tate will develop enough in the next few weeks that he will be a solid #3/#4 receivers as well as a solid kick returner. We should should all note that this is Edelman's job description. Aiken will always be active as a returner.

Barring injuries, I believe the eventual choice for the active roster will be between Tate and Edelman. I suspect that Tate will use his time well and will be the choice, even when Edelman is healthy.
Aside from that long TD, which was really a product of terrible coverage and overpursuit, Aiken didn't do much at all. Not really sure where you're seeing improvements, unless you're talking about his special teams play.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


PATS @ COLTS POSTGAME ANALYSIS BLOG IS NOW UP!
KontradictioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
offensive participation, sam aiken

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426