ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Regarding the likely yet to be finished Savage/Collins power struggle saga in Cleveland, at least one report suggests that Romeo's preference to see Savage remain in the GM position helped defuse the situation, at least temporarilly
You can read the whole report for yourself, but here's some highlights:
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
So what really happened here? One league source tells us that once Lerner heard the news -- and once coach Romeo Crennel made his preference known that he wants Savage to stay -- the boss man clunked together the heads of Collins and Savage and told them to kiss and make up.
....one of the theories making the rounds as of late Friday/early Saturday is that Collins and Savage have indeed reached rock bottom in their relationship, and that Savage (through agent Neil Cornrich) attempted to provoke a termination, which would then have enabled Savage and Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz (another Cornrich client and a close friend of Savage) to partner up in a new city for 2006.
If true, it appears that Savage and Cornrich might have played their hand too early. Still, the status quo is unacceptable; Savage and Collins don't like each other, and they can't work together moving forward. So perhaps the statement that Savage won't be fired represents an effort by the team to force Savage to leave. The hiring of Keenan, we're told, constitutes a breach of Savage's contract, which arguably would permit him to walk away without consequence.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by JoeSixPat; 12-31-2005 at 01:01 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Regarding the likely yet to be finished Savage/Collins power struggle saga in Cleveland, at least one report suggests that Romeo's preference to see Savage remain in the GM position helped defuse the situation, at least temporarilly
You can read the whole report for yourself, but here's some highlights:
If the Coach has say over who the GM is, then things are backwards, and they should just make Romeo GM/Coach
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
If the Coach has say over who the GM is, then things are backwards, and they should just make Romeo GM/Coach
It's not backwards - the key issue is only that there should be a partnership between coach and GM - that is having a coach and GM who are on the same page on personnel issues
NOT giving the Coach a voice in who the GM is seems like a VERY BAD idea as a Coach requires players who will fit into his system
Walking into this gig it seemed pretty clear that Romeo was hoping to find a partnership similar to what BB & SP have - yet still knowing that as a first time head coach, he was not going to be granted the same ultimate authority that Belicheck has
This report suggests that Romeo still feels that he and Savage are on the same page when it comes to personnel
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It's not backwards - the key issue is only that there should be a partnership between coach and GM - that is having a coach and GM who are on the same page on personnel issues
NOT giving the Coach a voice in who the GM is seems like a VERY BAD idea as a Coach requires players who will fit into his system
Walking into this gig it seemed pretty clear that Romeo was hoping to find a partnership similar to what BB & SP have - yet still knowing that as a first time head coach, he was not going to be granted the same ultimate authority that Belicheck has
This report suggests that Romeo still feels that he and Savage are on the same page when it comes to personnel
Yeah, but Standard Operation Procedure is the a GM is hired, then he decides on a Coach, not vice-versa. You don't see the GM getting canned in a disagreement with the HC. Or a President hire a HC and then ask who he'd like as GM.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
Yeah, but Standard Operation Procedure is the a GM is hired, then he decides on a Coach, not vice-versa. You don't see the GM getting canned in a disagreement with the HC. Or a President hire a HC and then ask who he'd like as GM.
I understand, but that's not what was happening here - there was no disagreement between the GM and HC
It was a situation where the President/CEO of Football operations was about to can the GM without input from the coach
When the owner did ask the input of the coach, the report suggests that the coach felt that the GM was a good match for his coaching schemes
What's backwards is the team President canning the GM without the input of the HC (or otherwise ignoring the HC's views)... in that case the President should can BOTH the GM and the HC
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I understand, but that's not what was happening here - there was no disagreement between the GM and HC
It was a situation where the President/CEO of Football operations was about to can the GM without input from the coach
When the owner did ask the input of the coach, the report suggests that the coach felt that the GM was a good match for his coaching schemes
What's backwards is the team President canning the GM without the input of the HC (or otherwise ignoring the HC's views)... in that case the President should can BOTH the GM and the HC
John Collins should be the one getting the boot to the @$$...I guess dandy Randy Lerner isn't such a fast "lerner". Butch Davis was Randy's bright idea also.
I think that Savage is already a pretty smart guy. What John Collins does so well is...licking the owners crack. He was the person responsible for the Janet Jackson no nipple boob incident in the superbowl half time show.
...yet he is the president of the Brownies. Hmmmmmm...
John Collins should be the one getting the boot to the @$$...I guess dandy Randy Lerner isn't such a fast "lerner". Butch Davis was Randy's bright idea also.
I think that Savage is already a pretty smart guy. What John Collins does so well is...licking the owners crack. He was the person responsible for the Janet Jackson no nipple boob incident in the superbowl half time show.
...yet he is the president of the Brownies. Hmmmmmm...
Obviously I'm not suggesting that Crennel OR Savage should be fired - I pointed out in the original thread on this how ludicrious it was to declare Savage (and by implication, Crennel) a failure
But, playing along with Dryheat's assessment that the GM should pick the HC, then the President obviously should pick both (with some logic involved) - and ultimately the owner is responsible for ensuring that everyone from the top down is pulling in the same direction
At the end of the day, the owner sided with Romeo, who sided with Savage
The owner needs to make a choice then - his HC/GM combo or his CEO - clearly Collins and Savage/Crennel are not on the same page
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Yeah, but Standard Operation Procedure is the a GM is hired, then he decides on a Coach, not vice-versa. You don't see the GM getting canned in a disagreement with the HC. Or a President hire a HC and then ask who he'd like as GM.
Yes you do occasionally, it happened this year in Miami. Nick Saban was hired, given control, and then hired Randy Mueller as GM.