Releasing vets with a guaranteed salary - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2009, 09:57 AM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,391
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Releasing vets with a guaranteed salary

I would have thought:

1. Galloway had a guaranteed salary on the Pats
2. If they waived him and some other team picked him up, they'd be responsible for paying the balance of his salary.
3. If he was cut and could choose where he signed, the Pats would have to pay his salary for the whole year.

I'm guessing at least one of those is wrong, however, perhaps #3 in that (here comes my guess) it was an agreed-upon cut.

Does anybody have insight into all this, and confidence in that insight?

Similarly questions could be asked about other vets, of course.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde

Last edited by Fencer; 10-20-2009 at 09:57 AM..
Fencer is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-20-2009, 10:00 AM   #2
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Releasing vets with a guaranteed salary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
I would have thought:

1. Galloway had a guaranteed salary on the Pats
2. If they waived him and some other team picked him up, they'd be responsible for paying the balance of his salary.
3. If he was cut and could choose where he signed, the Pats would have to pay his salary for the whole year.

I'm guessing at least one of those is wrong, however, perhaps #3 in that (here comes my guess) it was an agreed-upon cut.

Does anybody have insight into all this, and confidence in that insight?

Similarly questions could be asked about other vets, of course.
Galloway's salary is not "guaranteed" explicitly in his contract like others' are. It's only "guaranteed" because he can collect termination pay in the amount of the remaining balance. The team he signed with (the Bucs) will still have to pay him whatever salary they signed him at. I am not sure if Galloway is eligible now, that he has already re-signed, to collect termination pay in the amount of his remaining salary balance with the Pats.

EDIT: Here's the relevant CBA section. I think I was wrong with my last point; it appears that Galloway can collect termination pay (as long as he hasn't done it before in his career):

Quote:
ARTICLE XXIII
TERMINATION PAY
[SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY BENEFITS EXPERTS]

Section 1. Eligibility: Any player who has completed the season in which his fourth year or more of credited
service under the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle Retirement Plan has been earned shall be eligible for termination pay
under this Article if:

(1) He is released after his Club’s first regular season game; and
(2) He has made the Inactive or Active List of his Club on or after the date of his Club’s first regular season
game.

Subject to Section 3 below, the amount of termination pay payable to such player shall be the unpaid balance of
his Paragraph 5 Salary for that League Year. Termination pay under this Article shall be claimed and payable
no sooner than one day after the end of the regular season schedule, and no later than February 1. A player will
not be entitled to termination pay more than once during his playing career in the NFL.

Section 2. Regular Season Signings: The termination pay under this Article of any player who is terminated
from a contract which was signed after the beginning of the regular season in which he is terminated shall be
limited to an amount equal to the greater of: (i) the unpaid balance of the initial 25% of such player’s Paragraph
5 Salary, or (ii) one week’s salary up to a maximum of the Active/Inactive List Paragraph 5 Salary of a player
with ten or more Credited Seasons as specified in Article XXXVIII, Section 6, notwithstanding the actual
number of Credited Seasons the player has earned. For purposes of this 25% calculation only, the term
“Paragraph 5 Salary” shall be defined as the proportionate remaining balance to be paid at the time such player
is signed by the Club. (For example and without limitation, if a player is signed after the second week of the
2006 regular season to a Contract with a Paragraph 5 Salary of $850,000, his Paragraph 5 Salary for purposes of
the 25% calculation shall be $750,000 or 15/17ths of $850,000.)

Section 3. Ineligibility For Termination Pay:
(a) An otherwise qualified player will not be entitled to termination pay under this Article if the Club can
demonstrate that, after receipt of a written warning from his Club in the form attached hereto as Appendix N,
the player failed to exhibit the level of good faith effort which can be reasonably expected from NFL players on
that Club.
(b) A player shall not be eligible for Termination Pay if, without missing a game check at the
Paragraph 5 rate stated in his terminated contract, he signs a Player Contract with the same Club that terminated
his contract, which new contract provides for Paragraph 5 salary at a rate equal to or greater than that of his
terminated contract. If the player’s new contract is subsequently terminated, however, he shall be eligible for
Termination Pay for such subsequent termination.
pats1 is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:02 AM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Releasing vets with a guaranteed salary

They may have felt that his remaining salary would impact who made a waiver claim and the likely didn't want him to land back in the AFC. May have even worked this out for him, and for all we know he feels he's toast and preferred to close it out somewhere familiar. Probably has a home there still and certainly has friends.
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:05 AM   #4
JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,449
Default Re: Releasing vets with a guaranteed salary

Eric Alexander and TBC will be back with extensions.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cowboys Considering Releasing TO CheekyDave NFL Football Forum 1 01-14-2009 04:05 PM
Releasing Fast Freddie OCinPhilly PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 25 09-10-2006 10:40 AM
Red Sox releasing orginal broadcasts, I wish Pats did that brdmaverick PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 07-25-2005 08:03 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC