Our Amazing Defensive Turnaround - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2005, 03:35 PM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
JJDChE's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,821
My Mood: Amused
Default Our Amazing Defensive Turnaround

With the recent resurgence of our defense I went back and looked how things have progressed throughout the year. There is a dramatic split between the first three the games (OAK, CAR, PIT/when Harrison went down) the proceeding 8 games (SD thru KC), and then again in the last 3 games. I think everyone has had a sense that this was the case, but looking at the numbers it's even more pronounced than I ever imagined.

Here are the stats from the Middle 8 games vs. First 3/Last 3. After each stat, in parentheses, is where that number would rank in the NFL overall.

Code:
                  Mid 8 Games    First3/Last3  
------------------------------------------------
Points/Game        26.5 (#29)      12.8 (#2)
Yards per Game    424.0 (#32)     225.8 (#1)
Yards per play     6.28 (#32)      4.04 (#1)
3rd Down Conv.	  47.2% (#31)     31.3% (#4)
T.O.P.            33:41 (#32)     25:07 (#1)
1st Downs/Game     23.6 (#32)      13.7 (#1)
Pass Yds/Game     295.0 (#32)     165.8 (#1)
Comp %            64.9% (#31)     44.9% (#1)
Yards/Attempt      8.96 (#32)      5.27 (#1)
Pass TD/Game        2.0 (#31)       1.0 (#8)
INT/Game             .5 (#30)       1.0 (#15)
Sack/Game           1.1 (#32)       3.0 (#3)
Rush Yds/Game       129 (#27)        60 (#1)            
Rush yds/Attempt   3.97 (#15)      2.65 (#1)    
Rush TD/Game        0.9 (#21)       0.5 (#4)
Talk about night and day, in the mid-8 game stretch we were essentially the worst defense in the NFL, in the first 3/Last 3 we have been essentially the best defense in the NFL.

One of the amazing things is just how striking the splits are when you break it down. Literally, after the third game everything fell appart and after the 11th game everything came together. Look at the yardage totals per game, in order:

1. 351
2. 250
3. 269
4. 431
5. 400
6. 432
7. 394
8. 453
9. 437
10. 425
11. 420

12. 164
13. 183
14. 138

Buffalo (394 yds, week 8) was only 6 yds away from giving us 8 straight games of allowing 400 yds or more. San Francisco, the worst defense in the NFL, is allowing 399 ypg on the season. In the other six games, only Oakland (351 yds, week 1) gained more than 300. It truly has been two (or three, really) different teams throughout the season.


BTW, as a preemptive strike, I don't want to hear a peep about the competition in the first 3/last 3 segment. There were 3 playoff caliber teams and an overall strength of schedule of .464, which is about the same strength of schedule of the Colts and Bengals.
JJDChE is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-22-2005, 03:39 PM   #2
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,564
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJDChE
BTW, as a preemptive strike, I don't want to hear a peep about the competition in the first 3/last 3 segment. There were 3 playoff caliber teams and an overall strength of schedule of .464, which is about the same strength of schedule of the Colts and Bengals.
Additionally, while the last three may not (OK, are not) strong offensive teams, if you look at their season averages and compare those to what they did against us, we totally dominated them relative to their normal below average offensive output.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 03:42 PM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJDChE
With the recent resurgence of our defense I went back and looked how things have progressed throughout the year. There is a dramatic split between the first three the games (OAK, CAR, PIT/when Harrison went down) the proceeding 8 games (SD thru KC), and then again in the last 3 games. I think everyone has had a sense that this was the case, but looking at the numbers it's even more pronounced than I ever imagined.

Here are the stats from the Middle 8 games vs. First 3/Last 3. After each stat, in parentheses, is where that number would rank in the NFL overall.

Code:
                  Mid 8 Games    First3/Last3  
------------------------------------------------
Points/Game        26.5 (#29)      12.8 (#2)
Yards per Game    424.0 (#32)     225.8 (#1)
Yards per play     6.28 (#32)      4.04 (#1)
3rd Down Conv.	  47.2% (#31)     31.3% (#4)
T.O.P.            33:41 (#32)     25:07 (#1)
1st Downs/Game     23.6 (#32)      13.7 (#1)
Pass Yds/Game     295.0 (#32)     165.8 (#1)
Comp %            64.9% (#31)     44.9% (#1)
Yards/Attempt      8.96 (#32)      5.27 (#1)
Pass TD/Game        2.0 (#31)       1.0 (#8)
INT/Game             .5 (#30)       1.0 (#15)
Sack/Game           1.1 (#32)       3.0 (#3)
Rush Yds/Game       129 (#27)        60 (#1)            
Rush yds/Attempt   3.97 (#15)      2.65 (#1)    
Rush TD/Game        0.9 (#21)       0.5 (#4)
Talk about night and day, in the mid-8 game stretch we were essentially the worst defense in the NFL, in the first 3/Last 3 we have been essentially the best defense in the NFL.

One of the amazing things is just how striking the splits are when you break it down. Literally, after the third game everything fell appart and after the 11th game everything came together. Look at the yardage totals per game, in order:

1. 351
2. 250
3. 269
4. 431
5. 400
6. 432
7. 394
8. 453
9. 437
10. 425
11. 420

12. 164
13. 183
14. 138

Buffalo (394 yds, week 8) was only 6 yds away from giving us 8 straight games of allowing 400 yds or more. San Francisco, the worst defense in the NFL, is allowing 399 ypg on the season. In the other six games, only Oakland (351 yds, week 1) gained more than 300. It truly has been two (or three, really) different teams throughout the season.


BTW, as a preemptive strike, I don't want to hear a peep about the competition in the first 3/last 3 segment. There were 3 playoff caliber teams and an overall strength of schedule of .464, which is about the same strength of schedule of the Colts and Bengals.
Wow. When you put it that way it does look impressive. But could it be simply that teams figured out how to beat the pats (take shots down field) and the last three teams just are not capable of doing it?

Personally, it looks likes the base 3-4 can shut down the run and pressure the QB, that makes it easier for the secondary to function.
mosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 03:52 PM   #4
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
JJDChE's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,821
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosi
Wow. When you put it that way it does look impressive. But could it be simply that teams figured out how to beat the pats (take shots down field) and the last three teams just are not capable of doing it?

That is a possibility, but considering the likes of Matt Schaub, Gus Frerotte and Kelly Holcomb were torching our defense, you'd figure just about anyone could, especially Simms who has been connecting with Galloway for big plays on a regular basis.
JJDChE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 04:02 PM   #5
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,947
Default

Frerotte has been playing fairly well, not to mention how he burned us the last time we faced Miami. It will be interesting when we play Miami again if we continue with our total domination. Forget the weather conditions, if we totally dominate I think that will be quite telling.
scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 04:08 PM   #6
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scout
Frerotte has been playing fairly well, not to mention how he burned us the last time we faced Miami. It will be interesting when we play Miami again if we continue with our total domination. Forget the weather conditions, if we totally dominate I think that will be quite telling.
I agree. Brooks Bollinger (sp) played well against Miami last week so it will be interesting to see how he does against us this time.
mosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 04:12 PM   #7
Practice Squad
 
Brady#12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, England
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosi
I agree. Brooks Bollinger (sp) played well against Miami last week so it will be interesting to see how he does against us this time.

i think he will struggle alot against our D becuse the radiers dont have a great D really
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


A.Samuels #1 fan
Brady#12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 05:50 PM   #8
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

This is a fine example of ONE reason why this board is so great.

Son, who is an IT maven, is home for Christmas. I just had him come read over my shoulder ... and i pointed out what you're doing here. Dad said, you don't see this kind of data mining in the Herald or the Globe or on Bob Lobel, do ya?

Fine innocent lad replied, Maybe those media outlets should log on and read this site for their leads. "They do, my son, they do!"



__________________
- - - Leading the division by 2+ games - - -
flutie2phelan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 05:50 PM   #9
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default re:

That info is a little deceptive, because we had Rodney to start the season, and the last 3 QB's we have faced have not been good quarterbacks.

When a defense faces a bad quarterback, they can focus more on the run and put pressure on the offensive line.

I don't think we'll really know how good this defense is until the playoffs.
maverick4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 06:06 PM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,177
My Mood: Mellow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4
That info is a little deceptive, because we had Rodney to start the season, and the last 3 QB's we have faced have not been good quarterbacks.

When a defense faces a bad quarterback, they can focus more on the run and put pressure on the offensive line.

I don't think we'll really know how good this defense is until the playoffs.

It may be a little deceptive but these same bad qb's were torching us earlier in the year.
emoney_33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC