Bobs My Uncle

How would the Jets funky defense matchup scheme wise

TBonePatsFan

I'm not an X and O guy, but I suspect the Jets would leave Galloway uncovered ... odds are he'll drop the damn ball anyway

JSn

Scheme wise, they just have to attack and be disruptive. Especially if Lito is out, and only Revis stands out at corner.

With Welker in the game and the rust coming off, I'd pick the Pats to win if we played the Jets again this weekend already, no question.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Bobs My Uncle

That is if Brady can get the ball to him <wink>

Bobs My Uncle

I'm curious what the Pats flooding one side and creating coverage confusion would do to the Jests equally confusing scheme.

You know, turnabout being fair play and all.

JSn

LOL - Leave Galloway uncovered? Yep, that would be epic...

FAIL.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

JSn

Really these 2-3 TE sets are probably the answer to the Jets D.

If Welker races over the middle and Moss does his thing they have issues. If one of Baker or Watson release their block and start running, things could get very messy for the Jets quickly.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

FreeTedWilliams

They would laugh because only Galloway and the RT would be eligible receivers, and the Pats would march backwards 5 yards because Kazur forgot to report the he was eligible....

You must have 6 men on the line of scrimmage the 2 most outside guys are "eligible receivers" and must have an eligible number or report to the ref prior to the play.

__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Bostonian1962

My wife is more the XO person than I am. She's sending me emails all the time with XOXOXO.

I'll ask her.

BradyManny

I'm no X & O guy, but I assume the Jets would just run out their dime defense with 6 DBs, and still man up against the 4 wide in the cover-1 man under Belichick said they were playing. This would free up Rhodes to hang around the line of scrimmage and potentially blitz.

The only favorable matchup would be Watson vs. an LB.

Essentially, I think we'd run into the same problem we did against them in Week 2. If their corners were able to cover our wideouts, and jam them at the line, they could still rush 5 guys and give our line trouble. Plus, by putting all our wideouts on one side, it makes it a lot easier for the safety over the top.

Again, I don't know a lot about the finer points of X's and O's, but I don't think this solves the issue. The Pats receivers just have to beat the Jets corners and get separation, and they weren't doing it in Week 2.

I'd rather them run varied formations like they did against the Falcons. Use the 2 TEs to disguise run or pass and not let the defense know how many pass receiving threats are out there. That way, you could do your best to keep the Jets in their base defense, where you can create some matchups against their LBs who are not good in pass coverage.