ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patjew
I trust BB as much as anyone does, but I guess I'm too short.
I thought everyone in China was short?
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
I listen... Holley has eluded to it in the past as have some of the locals. I can't remember exactly what it was over but it made their relationship pretty tense just before he left. And Bill isn't one to forgive and forget.
So Belichick and Smith hate each other. Felger and Belichick hate each other and Belichick purposely sent players to screw with Felger because he hated him. Sorry I ain't buying it.
Knowing what I know about Holley, if there was tension between Smith and Belichick and neither were letting on, Holley wouldn't be the one who outed this contention. Holley and Smith are friends (Holley has said that before) and I doubt he would compromise Smith's trust by illuding to that. Besides, Smith is non-confrontational and not controversial.
Sorry, if Bill hated Smith so much, no way would he have the scoop of his contract extension. No way would Smith sit on the story and release it when the Patriots wanted it released. I just can't see that happening. Smith's timing of his Belichick contract extension story was in great benefit to Belichick because it was a week after Spygate broke.
Besides, it is irrelevant since although you say Smith said these things because he has an ax to grind, he has been in the past (as recently as last year) one of the biggest Belichick and Patriots "homers" in the media. Smith rarely if ever says anything that isn't glowing about Belichick or the Pats. That's why I started this thread because his shots at the Pats' defense are out of character for him. He was the one immediately after Brady went down who guaranteed the Pats would win 11 to 12 games because of Belichick.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
I predicted they'd go with the Balt, Pitt & SD # little fishy when vegas has NE as a clear #1 but not bspn. we're getting our share of love too PKing & others, but honestly we'd all rather fly under the radar anyway.
It is interesting that Vegas has NE high & ESPN doesn't; that is no surprise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
I love how the media is also trying to make bill look like a meanie for forcing Richard to "relocate his family from mass." # the media can't stand BB. He is an ******* to them so they go out of their way to make him look like scrooge.
BB has made mistakes. this isn't the deion branch fiasco.
I was the only poster on this board at the time who questioned the sanity of that decision. everyone else was saying, goodbye Deion, you are a selfish me-first guy, we don't need you we're just fine wtih Caldwell and Gabriel, etc Having a legit receiver on taht team earns us a ring in 06 & whatever extra 1-2 mill that DB was asking for he was worth & we all know it now. DB threatened to sit out the REG season & NE hadn't dealt with that before. NE was looking at DB's value on the open market as not being very high & using that as leverage against him. But BB refused to acknowledge that Deion's value to NE was greater than any other team because of his RAPPORT with TB & and that DB understood this and that ultimately that gave him the upper hand at the table (& rightfully so to a certain extent). the rapport with TB is what made his value exceed what it was elsewhere based on his pure talent alone. Bill really let his ego get in the way of that one & we learned the hard way. And we were talking about FAR LESS money than we are with sey. The moral of that one was that you better consult with TB before letting a cheap receiver walk who put in thousands of hours of practice with him;.they learned & basically any receiver who gets let go now, is a guy who TB doesn't like. But that summer Tom told PKing that he didn't want DB to be let go * BB ignored him & took the economic hard line stance. I'm not suggesting that BB should ever "overpay" anyone, I'm just suggesting that we totally missed DB's true value.
Firstly, the team had a big lead in that game,the offense got points on the board, it wasn't the O that did not do the job, it was a tired and sick D that gave up all the points. As far as I know DB plays on one side of the ball.
Actually Branch earlier in the year said that he was going to HONOR his contract and then basically turned it over to his agent. It was his friend Givens who was a FA and he was not happy that he wasn't as well. I also think the fact that the Patriots went after DMason earlier that year for big bucks did not please him. And that was when Deion put himself first and threatened not to play. There was nothing RIGHT with what he did. It was PURE GREED and yet the team negotiated, although at that point, DB had basically made his decision about not playing. It has nothing to do about letting a "cheap receiver walk" it has more to do with a contract that existed that a greedy player failed to honor. If you think that is all ego you missed the point entirely as to what happened. If anything the Patriots went beyond where they should have to sign him to an extension, but the decision by DB was already made and the Pats had no choice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
But you can't sit there & pretend that every move BB makes is wrong like Felger & expect anyone to take you seriously. tonight he even said that the Buff had better receivers than NE! Yeah, the most talented deep threat in the history of the league & the best slot receiver in the game, but Felger says, "yeah, but who do they have after that." #
If Felger said that, he's just trying to stir the pot. If he really believes that and he may, he's dumber than the nearest stone wall and why I don't pay attention to him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
but the seymour deal is easily equal net present value #no FO makes decisions based solely on the current season #they'd be laughed out of the league. it's a salary cap system. # it's not just win right now at all costs. the fans dont' get it and they never will. YOU CAN'T KEEP EVERYONE. you have to manage the cap & that means looking at FUTURE years. As great players get older, their performance DECLINES, but their contract value usually INCREASES. If fans could understand this basic economic principle & realize that under a salary cap you have to avoid this AT ALL COSTS. especially when Davis gives away his top pick in teh draft.
I think you have said something quite large here about how a player's contract increases and at some point their playing ability decreases;it's an important evaluation to not sign a player to a big deal when you think a player's ability is headed down. This is hardly an exact science and there are some exceptions;Seau;Galloway; older beyond most and can play. So a team would rather let go of a player a bit before this happens rather than waiting and having a big contract with one on the decline. And it's more value than anything else. A top player on the decline might have value, but at a more reasonable dollar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
Sey is going to suck in Oak. the guy plays when he wants to now# takes off plays #takes off games#inconsistent & I really think it speaks about his conditioning. BB doesn't want him to train down in SC because he knows he ISN'T training he's BBQing & giant DTs need to stay in really good shape as they get toward the 10 yr mark. borges is a friend & would never admit it, but it's not just the injuries that have hurt richard, it's his age, & also his conditioning. How much effort is he going to give out in OAK!?
if word had leaked that Davis had offered NE a high 1st rnd pick for an aging DT in the last yr of his contract but NE balked & didn't do the deal, the radio people like Felger would be SCREAMING at him after all, he let Cassel go to his buddy Pioli for a 2nd rounder, why wouldn't he be willing to part with Sey at this stage of his career for that kind of value. They are all contrarians.
I tend to agree..those same big mouths that hate this deal would be doing the same thing in retrospect.."you mean they had a first round pick from Oakland and did not do the deal?" Absolutely true..it's more to stir the pot..no matter which way it goes..and sadly, I believe the mediots(media-idiots) have really driven the dislike for the trade. I don;t think he will do poorly in Oakland..or wherever he may end up, but I do think he's more on the decline and that might take a few years to happen. But being on the downswing of a 5 year deal after 2 years is more likely what could happen. Which is why I am sure he wants so much guaranteed and up front. THAT wasn't happening here..and a 3rd round pick would have been scoffed at by the media.."Seymour walks, the team gets a 3rd could have had more." Again contrarians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
as for whether Sey's feelings are hurt who effing cares. Deal with it #you wanted to play hardball with NE good for you they can play that game too. It's a business, just like YOU always said.
Another good point it's a business, so it's a business when you grab your large contract as well as when you get traded to Oakland deal!
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
Same bs with BMarshall. All the former avg players who are now commentators acting like he is a "distraction" & not being "a team player" IT'S THE OFFSEASON he'll show up & play the games & be a great teammate, just like 9 out of 10 other great players who try to negotiate their way into more money by holding out or being a malcontent. it's a NEGOTIATING tactic. They players are nowadays instructed by their agents to hold out or act dissatisfied with their deals. It's how the league works at the superstar level. Most of the guys on TV, like Dilfer, THasselbeck were not superstars & do not understand this principle.
You don't think Marshall is a distraction?? If what he did was a negotiating tactic, it's a poor one. It only works if teams give in to such nonsense and more and more teams are not. The only negotiating he is doing is out the door. If more teams did that it would not work, but there are always some left that buy into that. Marshall had a good year but not a superstar now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
It's almost always a political reason behind these picks though. for ex it's well known that MSmith is desperate to earn national respect & that he's afraid of being seen as a homer. Notice he always makes sure to mention PManning & THEN Brady when mentioning the best QBs in the league. please don't think that's an accident.
I like the fact that Schefter isn't afraid to say Den is underated. I agree & he's right, but most guys who used to beat report for a team #ESPECIALLY ex-BOS media members #are usually afraid to go there.
Smith like most seem to go for the easy picks; the bland; and without big names..HOW could the Patriots D REALLY be all that good? No Bruschi, Harrison, Vrabel, Seymour I mean HOW could the D be good? Again, it's more an understanding of how the whole is as compared to the parts. Without Harrison, Vrabel, Bruschi and Seymour, there are holes, but with a 43..the holes aren't exactly the same. The team is replacing Seymour NOT in a 34..but in a 43..which is a bit different. Same with Bruschi and Vrabel. What is lacking in the D..big point might be leadership..but Mayo, Thomas Warren and others in the backfield will step it up. I also like the fact that the ESPN types and more are not hyping the team..under the radar is a lot better than being a sitting target.
TO the OP..I tried to include all, but 10000 char limit..
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVN
dont care about what he says but objectively its not wrong to say that our defense has questions right now. jason campbell of all people was able to throw at and over our corners for e.g . yes preseason granted but nothing wrong in admitting that we have lot of unknown on defense at this juncture and how it will play out unlike the offense.
You don't know any more about the offense than youy do about the defense. No eam is a guaranteed lock for anything. But either you feel good about the Pats chances or you don't. Smith does not, based on preseason play. There isn't much dumber than basing anything on preseason as different teams have different priorities. I read once that the Steelers would deliberately set the defense in the wrong formation to see who players react to being out of position and to give them practice a recovering. They would have a worse preseason than a team that tries hard to win preseason games by stunting, etc for whatever reason, but which team will come out of presaeson stronger (althoukgh with a worse record and horrible stats)?
The Lions were 4-0 last preseason.
We should remember that
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
He was on the ESPN Preseason show and he multiple times talked about the Pats' defense negatively. He pointed out "I know it is preseason, but the Pats had the 32nd ranked defense in the league this preseason" (granted he failed to point out that only 27 of the 96 points allowed was by the first defense) and when Trey Wingo asked why no one picked the the Pats for the Super Bowl winner on the panel, Smith replied "Defense wins championships". He did speak glowingly about Brady though.
I don't care what he thinks of the Pats' defense, but I do think it's fair to say that the D won't be as good as in years past. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think we'll see a lot more 31-27 games and a lot fewer 27-13 games.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivanvamp
I don't care what he thinks of the Pats' defense, but I do think it's fair to say that the D won't be as good as in years past. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think we'll see a lot more 31-27 games and a lot fewer 27-13 games.
Well, until they prove otherwise, no one could reasonably argue that this defense is remotely as good as the 2003 or 2004 defense. But then again, you don't need a defense that good to do damage with the offense the Pats have.
On the 2003 kick, did anyone really think the Pats were going to have as good of a defense as they did that year before the season started. The defense in 2002 was putrid against the run and they rebuilt the entire secondary other than Law with a converted CB at safety, a Harrison that people thought was just about done, and an unheralded Tyrone Poole who was considered a good nickelback, but a mediocre starter. They had a lot of turnover on defense that season too ousting starters including Anthony Pleasants (ok, he was only ousted from the starting lineup), Lawyer Milloy, Tebucky Jones, Steve Martin, and Otis Smith.They added Ted Washington mid-preseason because they had no legitimate NT. Maybe lightning could strike twice.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
Eh, I like Smith but his opinion and everyone else's opinion on ESPN doesn't matter to me. A year ago, they were all saying how we needed to get younger, our defense was way too old, long in the tooth, etc. etc. etc. Now we ARE younger on defense and it's still not good enough. Either way, we can't win. We as Pats fans should know that by now.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
As others have said, I'm glad a lot of the media is jumping off the Pats' bandwagon. They won 3 Super Bowls when the media doubted them all of the time.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Quote:
Originally Posted by holyredeemer
This is awesome. I hope all the hate from the media concerning our D catches like a California wildfire and spreaddds.
Forget being favorites year in and year out.
Forget going undefeated during the regular season. Where did that get us?
Our D can look shaky to start, but Brady will still win us some games. All of our new acquisitions, the FA's and the Rooks will figure it out, and BB and his staff will figure his new toys out. When the game matters most, they'll be making less mistakes.
Here's a salute to losin some games this yr. and getting angry again.
I agree. We are young on defense. They might not be world beaters out of the gate but that is how we fly under the radar and gain some mojo.
On paper this team could be DANGEROUS.
In reality, I like to watch the games and let other people do the guessing and speculating. However, I am sort of feeling inspired this year about this team.
But I do not expect an easy path. All our glory years followed a tough path.
I welcome the disrespect card. That is like fuel to the Pats.
Re: Michael Smith isn't all that high on the Patriots
Linear Mode
