Patriot_in_NY

WHY the EFF would we trade a 2011 1st for a top notch experienced 3-4 front 7 player when it's pretty clear that we'll probably be running a 4-3 as our base nest year.

Your so stuck on who we're losing without paying the least bit of attention as to WHY we are losing them. These are not arbitrary moves you know. The defense is changing, so must the personnel we put in it. I don't think BB felt that having BOTH RS and VW this year is quite as crucial as you do, certainly not compared to what the offer on the table was. Since you don't have any rings, don't mind the rest of us who defer to the one that does.

We clearly got the better end of the Seymour deal in the long run. That's all that matters. I appreciate everything we got out of RS, but as BB say's

"He don't play for us no more".... Time to move on a talk about the players that do.

By the way, I'd say Ware as to the answer to the question.

HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

It's nice to trade for a player like Reed, Palomalu or Ware right now but that's not going to happen. However, a trade for Ware may be possible next off season as he is slated to become a restricted free agent if it's an uncapped year.

But as of right now, I can't think of any realistic trades that can improve the Pats today. However, I think they need to improve their depth at LB.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

borg

I'd go get Seymour with a 4th

Deus Irae

No, they didn't. What happens in the future is unknown.

__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.

There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

shmessy

That's next year.

__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com

Patriot_in_NY

True, Oakland could win a SB in 2010, or BB could draft Ryan Leaf, but given the law of averages I'd say neither is very likely and We get a very high (top 10) pick, for which BB has a VERY good history at hitting on.

GullyFoyle

Matt Jones WR- Moss, Jones on the outside Welker Edelman in the middle, and we wouldnt even need a defense

Also I would love a shut down corner or a big playmaking safety

__________________
“Gully Foyle is my name.”
“Terra is my nation.”
“Deep space is my dwelling place.”
“Death’s my destination.”

Deus Irae

1.) This season actually counts.

2.) Seymour can still play several productive seasons

3.) That pick is not guaranteed to be a top 5 or top 10 pick, despite all the claims

4.) The odds are that the pick will not be a player as good as Seymour

__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.

There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

shmessy

By the way, I would go for a monster LT.

__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com

mgteich

What! Blasphemy! Of course, Belichick will draft a player better than Seymour.