49ers release Damon Huard - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

***pats1*** · 09-01-2009, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deus Irae

Yes, I prefer a 27 year old player who didn't work out in the most dysfunctional spot in the league over a player who's been cut loose by 4 teams, including this very team, and is 36 years old.

Right, because the Patriots never bring in aging veterans to fill their backup quarterback spots. John Friesz, (Damon Huard), Jim Miller, Doug Flutie, and Vinny Testaverde mustn't have been on the team, then.

Patsfanin Philly · 09-01-2009, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deus Irae

Yes, I prefer a 27 year old player who didn't work out in the most dysfunctional spot in the league over a player who's been cut loose by 4 teams, including this very team, and is 36 years old.

Then I take it that Jeff George is out of the picture????

JD10367 · 09-01-2009, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

Right, because the Patriots never bring in aging veterans to fill their backup quarterback spots. John Friesz, (Damon Huard), Jim Miller, Doug Flutie, and Vinny Testaverde mustn't have been on the team, then.

Not sure what that has to do with it. Yes, the Pats don't hesitate to bring in an aging vet. That doesn't mean Huard is a GOOD aging vet. Even at his advanced age, Testaverde had some tread on the tires. Also, most of those guys had much greater success than Huard. Buying a used Audi is one thing; buying a used Yugo is another.

Bostonian1962 · 09-01-2009, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

Damon Huard

Could there be more of a lock to become a Patriot?

Agree COMPLETELY!!!!!! And, we wouldn't have to trade for him. I love this. Please let it happen.

***pats1*** · 09-01-2009, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Not sure what that has to do with it. Yes, the Pats don't hesitate to bring in an aging vet. That doesn't mean Huard is a GOOD aging vet. Even at his advanced age, Testaverde had some tread on the tires. Also, most of those guys had much greater success than Huard. Buying a used Audi is one thing; buying a used Yugo is another.

I think Huard is just as good at this point, if not better, than those players were when the Pats signed them. Huard knows the system and is about the bset you're going to get on the street for an experienced quarterback. I'd rather have him coming into a gme to replace Brady than Walter, and I'd rather have Huard holding a clipboard than Walter. And the Pats could certainly keep both; Hoyer shouldn't have too much of a problem making it to the practice squad.

Mack Herron · 09-01-2009, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

I think Huard is just as good at this point, if not better, than those players were when the Pats signed them. Huard knows the system and is about the bset you're going to get on the street for an experienced quarterback. I'd rather have him coming into a gme to replace Brady than Walter, and I'd rather have Huard holding a clipboard than Walter. And the Pats could certainly keep both; Hoyer shouldn't have too much of a problem making it to the practice squad.

This is really the point. If you think there simply has not been enough time to gain confidence that Walter can step in, and you KNOW that it is too soon to put Hoyer in that position, then Huard makes sense. It is also possible they do not want to expose Hoyer (who they have looked at for a couple of months at least).

***MoLewisrocks*** · 09-01-2009, 09:54 PM

Huard is the reason Cassel is the $60M man in KC. He's had his chances and he's taken his lumps, five fold. He was Drew's backup and wingman for the 2001 season only he got lapped by the 6th rounder. He didn't want to stay and back him up, why would Bill want him now? Pioli cut him as soon as he got to KC... He needs a solid backup, not a veteran presence which is what Flutie and Testaverde were here for. Brady is now that veteran presence (in BB's book that's a player with 8+ seasons and some success at overcoming adversity). They were only going to come in if Tom went down in a game. By the next week Cassel was going to be coached up if they needed a longer replacement. Walter has the NFL exposure Cassel lacked. He will be the first guy in and unless he totally tanks Hoyer will never see the field

***Deus Irae*** · 09-01-2009, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

I think Huard is just as good at this point, if not better, than those players were when the Pats signed them. Huard knows the system and is about the bset you're going to get on the street for an experienced quarterback. I'd rather have him coming into a gme to replace Brady than Walter, and I'd rather have Huard holding a clipboard than Walter. And the Pats could certainly keep both; Hoyer shouldn't have too much of a problem making it to the practice squad.

Kansas City fans would strongly disagree.

jefmblrd · 09-02-2009, 04:39 AM

He's worth a look.

nashvillepatsfan · 09-02-2009, 04:49 AM

I forgot this is one of those weeks, where we'll see a bunch of these threads.

ok, Huard first......ummm,,,no. I havent see enough of Walter to be able to say he's no good. Thats why im really looking forward to thurs game. I have, however, seen enough of Huard to think we'd be desperate to bring him back. Its not that i don't like the guy, but i think there will be better options out there next week, IF BB decides to go that route.