ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Last night's game reminded me a lot of what we've seen over the past 8 years or so...
They either have REALLY fantastic games or REALLY crappy games. We see it all the time... the Pats are playing great, and then they lose by 30 points. Or they score a zillion points in a season and then fall apart in a single game. Fairly consistently, however that first drive goes tends to dictate whether the Pats will mope around and get run over or whether they will stand up and crush their opponent.
I've watched a lot of football, and the Pats seem to me to be by far the most bi-polar team in the league.
Am I completely imagining things, or do the Pats seem to collectively act euphoric or depressed/lethargic in any given game? I can't think of very many games recently where they have played "average". It always seems to be some extreme.
If I'm not imagining things, then what could be causing it? Why was our pass protection brilliant last week and pathetic last night? Was Cinci THAT much better than the Eagles?
Last edited by Snarf; 08-21-2009 at 11:38 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
It is a preseason game. The coaching staff is tinkering around with various packes and assignments for the players to see what works and what doesn't work. The team was playing to those assignments, not trying to win the game as if it were the Super Bowl.
There. Hope that helps you and others. For the record, I do have my worries on a few smaller issues as well. But I'm not going to panic that the team is going to be horrible this year based on a preseason game. You shouldn't either.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Patriots are, without a doubt, one of the least "bi-polar" teams in the NFL and it's been that way since 2001. I can't think of many examples of them playing great one week and then losing by 30 points the next week. They're a consistent team. Aside from most of 2007, they've rarely been the type of team that overwhelms and dominates the opponents en route to victory. They rarely lose in blowout fashion and even in defeat they are almost always competitive. I don't really know where you're getting this idea from and I don't know why some people make such a big deal about a 7-6 loss in a preseason game in which the starters played all of two series.
That embarrassing blow out in a preseason game last night has rattled some cages today. Either we've not watched the same team or this is a strange view on the Patriots in the past eight years.
People need to step back from the edge, it was only the second pre season game.. usually a game that showcases a lot of new players, new packages... everything will be ok.. keep repeating..
Do not think the pats are bi-polar, but have always felt that they played to the level of competition..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
People need to step back from the edge, it was only the second pre season game.. usually a game that showcases a lot of new players, new packages... everything will be ok.. keep repeating..
Do not think the pats are bi-polar, but have always felt that they played to the level of competition..
Most coaches will tell you that playing to the level of the competition means your team lacks a killer instinct. Outside of Brady, Mankins and Light, we lack nastiness.
If we could bottle Rodney Harrison's passion, nastiness and killer instinct and give it to all 53 players, we would be unstoppable.
I ripped the Pats graphic off of the back window of my Jetta today. What a disgusting, lazy performance last night...come on guys, show some friggin pride. I mostly blame Belichick. He's the one not preparing the team, not putting them in position to win. The magic is clearly gone with him.
Hopefully next year Mike Holmgren or Dennis Erickson can come in hear and clean this place up!
I ripped the Pats graphic off of the back window of my Jetta today. What a disgusting, lazy performance last night...come on guys, show some friggin pride. I mostly blame Belichick. He's the one not preparing the team, not putting them in position to win. The magic is clearly gone with him.
Hopefully next year Mike Holmgren or Dennis Erickson can come in hear and clean this place up!
Matt Millen. We need Matt Millen to replace Pioli.
He can lure Mary Morningweg here for big $$$ and we can rid rid of the loser Belichick!
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
Last night's game reminded me a lot of what we've seen over the past 8 years or so...
They either have REALLY fantastic games or REALLY crappy games. We see it all the time... the Pats are playing great, and then they lose by 30 points. Or they score a zillion points in a season and then fall apart in a single game. Fairly consistently, however that first drive goes tends to dictate whether the Pats will mope around and get run over or whether they will stand up and crush their opponent.
I've watched a lot of football, and the Pats seem to me to be by far the most bi-polar team in the league.
Am I completely imagining things, or do the Pats seem to collectively act euphoric or depressed/lethargic in any given game? I can't think of very many games recently where they have played "average". It always seems to be some extreme.
If I'm not imagining things, then what could be causing it? Why was our pass protection brilliant last week and pathetic last night? Was Cinci THAT much better than the Eagles?
I wonder are you one of the people that were going to jump and end it all in 2007? Cause i remember in the pre-season there were a lot crying the sky is falling and how did that turn out.