ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Anyone else real impressed by this kid? For a 6th round pick he looks a steal and BB+Pees must rate him seeing the time he got against Philly
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Absolutely. I thought he looked great out there. I was really impressed. There were two plays where he had a sack and a hurry. I know the O-line of the eagles was banged up, but still very impressive. I expect him to contribute at the end of the season. I didn't notice much of Brace...
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nestapats
Absolutely. I thought he looked great out there. I was really impressed. There were two plays where he had a sack and a hurry. I know the O-line of the eagles was banged up, but still very impressive. I expect him to contribute at the end of the season. I didn't notice much of Brace...
There was one play where Brace made a tackle about 15 yards downfield chasing down Mccoy after a long run. I though it showed good speed for a big man.....
Last edited by Patsfanin Philly; 08-15-2009 at 07:01 AM..
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwedd
Yes, he looked good. The thing to remember is that this was one game, and it is now up to him (and the others) to show he can do this consistently.
Agreed here... It is only one game, but even more interesting is the 4-3. That is to say : I was wondering what was up with so many DLs in the draft, thinking most would just get cut. Could it be NE's going to actually be playing significant 4-3 after so many years of insisting to stick to the 3-4 base ? Time will tell, but Pryor did the most of his chance.
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
I'm just speculating but Belichick might now be of the opinion that the type of LBs required for his defense are difficult to find, and rather than trying to keep looking for the diamonds that can play in this system, he's going to a 4-3 that uses many of the same principles (i.e. two-gap play) as his 3-4. As long as he finds a safety who can fill in the middle, this could work.
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1
I'm just speculating but Belichick might now be of the opinion that the type of LBs required for his defense are difficult to find, and rather than trying to keep looking for the diamonds that can play in this system, he's going to a 4-3 that uses many of the same principles (i.e. two-gap play) as his 3-4. As long as he finds a safety who can fill in the middle, this could work.
Just speculating.
Yes, yes it could. What has always been one of Coach's hallmarks is his ability to see the big picture, in any number of areas, and adapt of the fly to meet the new challenge(s).
re: Myron Pryor (and more broadly, the shape of the DL)
Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1
I'm just speculating but Belichick might now be of the opinion that the type of LBs required for his defense are difficult to find, and rather than trying to keep looking for the diamonds that can play in this system, he's going to a 4-3 that uses many of the same principles (i.e. two-gap play) as his 3-4. As long as he finds a safety who can fill in the middle, this could work.
Just speculating.
They were switching in and out of a two-gap system the whole first half. There was one drive where they were running upfield the whole series and kept getting gashed on the ground (remember that one with the 19 yeard screen to McCoy). Then they stopped and two-gapped the next couple of plays and the Eagles had to settle for a field goal eventually.
If anything it seems to me more of a recognition that the NFL has become a passing league. If they move to a 4-3 they're just putting more emphasis on pressure and coverage. With the old 3-4 defense they ran, the basic principle is to take away the run and the deep ball, and force the opposing team to execute long-to-go pass plays. But I think what they found is that it's just too easy now -- because of the emphasis on defensive holding penalties and the opposite problem of linemen basically being allowed to hold on every play -- to complete passes. So you create a defense that's a little lighter (you're switching out one 3-4 end like Warren for a 4-3 end like Burgess), gets a little more pressure, and forces opponents to run a little more.