What type of subpackages did you see more often? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2009, 05:54 AM   #1
On The Game Day Roster
 
KevinFaulk-33's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 262
My Mood: Bored
Default What type of subpackages did you see more often?

I would like to analyze some of the subpackages that Bill Belichick used in the last two years to understand what roles can have players like Tank Williams, Derrick Burgess, Shawn Springs or young player like Shawn Crable...

I remember a 4-2-5 from last year...

It would be interesting also to predict some of the new package that can be installed with this revamped defense... Think of Brace!

I hope that this thread can be intersting...


X 'n O's!
__________________
Bye, Bye, Baby!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
KevinFaulk-33 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-08-2009, 07:07 AM   #2
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
RoughingthePasser's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,165
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

The time for pain is NOW!!!!!
__________________
"Practice execution equals reality"-BB
'Don't be that guy who ruins a season."' -BParcells
RoughingthePasser is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 10:29 AM   #3
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,195
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

There are others here that can get in to the X's and O's details much better than I can, but one thing I wonder about is the use of the 'hybrid' S/LB. It seems that Belichick has wanted to utilize this for a while now but has been derailed by season ending injuries in training camp - first to Tebucky Jones in 2006, and then to Tank Williams last year. I haven't heard any talk about the hybrid role this year so perhaps that means it is unlikely to be used much.

Williams appears to be no more than 50-50 to make this year's roster; if he is cut would that mean this idea is shelved, or is there somebody else that would take over that role? How often would it be employed? For specific down-and-distances, or just dependent on the opponent and the matchup? Or is this simply something that will rarely, if ever be used this season based on the other players on this year's roster?
jmt57 is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 11:38 AM   #4
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

Pees has a 4-3 variation that he ran at various colleges before coming to the Pats. I think that we currently have the right personnel to run it effectively. It actually looks at times like a 6-1, but can quickly turn into a 5-2, 4-3, and even back to a 3-4 prior to the snap. I imagine to see something that looks as follows:

One the line (left to right): AD, Burgess, Warren, Wilfork, Seymour, Guyton

Second level: Mayo

Obviously they can quickly switch all the back to a 3-4 (5-2, 4-3) with any personnel changes. If they do stay like this for the snap, or even switch to a 5-2 (with Guyton dropping back into the middle with Mayo), the offense would have to deal with Burgess and AD rushing off of the same end. This would probably mean no double teams for Seymour.

The counter for this type of D is running between the tackles, and quick short passes. A lot of pressure is placed on the lone ILB and the secondary, but this year I think that we have the personnel to handle it.

Thoughts?
flyonthewall is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 12:07 PM   #5
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,104
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

I can forsee an Okie short 3 and 1 Defense 5-2-4.

DL: Seymour, Wilfork, Brace, Lekevin, Warren;
LB: AD & Mayo; and
DB: Bodden, Tank, Chung and Meriwether/Springs/Bodden
AzPatsFan is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 12:12 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,104
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
There are others here that can get in to the X's and O's details much better than I can, but one thing I wonder about is the use of the 'hybrid' S/LB. It seems that Belichick has wanted to utilize this for a while now but has been derailed by season ending injuries in training camp - first to Tebucky Jones in 2006, and then to Tank Williams last year. I haven't heard any talk about the hybrid role this year so perhaps that means it is unlikely to be used much.

Williams appears to be no more than 50-50 to make this year's roster; if he is cut would that mean this idea is shelved, or is there somebody else that would take over that role? How often would it be employed? For specific down-and-distances, or just dependent on the opponent and the matchup? Or is this simply something that will rarely, if ever be used this season based on the other players on this year's roster?
BB still wants that SS/LB solution to cure the short over-the-middle vulnerability. I believe BB used his first pick in the draft for Patrick Chung to insure that he would have at least one SS/LB. Tank and Chung are the SS/LB candidates,and both are currently available.
AzPatsFan is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 01:15 PM   #7
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,223
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

The next subpackage
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 01:33 PM   #8
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
RoughingthePasser's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,165
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
There are others here that can get in to the X's and O's details much better than I can, but one thing I wonder about is the use of the 'hybrid' S/LB. It seems that Belichick has wanted to utilize this for a while now but has been derailed by season ending injuries in training camp - first to Tebucky Jones in 2006, and then to Tank Williams last year. I haven't heard any talk about the hybrid role this year so perhaps that means it is unlikely to be used much.

Williams appears to be no more than 50-50 to make this year's roster; if he is cut would that mean this idea is shelved, or is there somebody else that would take over that role? How often would it be employed? For specific down-and-distances, or just dependent on the opponent and the matchup? Or is this simply something that will rarely, if ever be used this season based on the other players on this year's roster?
Good point on the LB/S hybrid in Jones and now Tank Williams. Couple other guys can switch it up too-not just in those positions.

We saw some action from Rodney crowding the box and pass rushing last yr too. It will be an option but I doubt we'll see it frequently-we won't need to hopefully.

It's an another option to have on defense if we have candidates that can EXECUTE during game time plays and make adjustments to the offense.

We may need to on some Wildcat formations
__________________
"Practice execution equals reality"-BB
'Don't be that guy who ruins a season."' -BParcells
RoughingthePasser is offline  
Old 08-08-2009, 01:52 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Frezo's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plaistow, NH
Posts: 3,423
My Mood: Lonely
Default Re: What type of subpackages did you see more often?

short yardage package called "Big Drink Left"


-----------------------------------Taylor

----------------------------Brady---Hochstein


Lewis----------Kaczur Neal Koppen Mankins Light Vollmer--Baker



PS, I'm not a coach, but did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Frezo is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 07:51 PM   #10
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,195
Blog Entries: 20
Default Guru of the 3-4 giving in to 4-3? Belichick tries Wilfork-Brace duo

Guru of the 3-4 giving in to 4-3? Belichick tries Wilfork-Brace duo by Rich Garven of the Worcester Telegram & Gazette

Quote:
The Patriots favor a 3-4 defense, and perhaps no coach in the game today is more familiar with the intricacies of the formation than Bill Belichick.

But a funny thing has happened since the start of training camp: The Patriots have been fiddling with something that looks very much like a 4-3 defense. A lot.

“Any time you have two guys, two defensive linemen inside on the center and guards as opposed to one, and two linebackers, then you create some different matchups, different opportunities, different leverage points on the offense,” Belichick said.
Quote:
“Ron and Vince are big guys, athletic, they certainly can hold the point and are extremely stout,” Belichick said. “But when they penetrate or shoot the gap or try to get on the edge of a blocker instead of right over the top of them, sometimes they can be pretty hard to stop. They get a lot of momentum heading into the gap, and if you don’t get over in front of them, they can penetrate and be disruptive.
jmt57 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patriots Type player thread. PATSNUTme Patriots Draft Talk 17 03-09-2009 10:24 AM
OT: Jay Cutler diagnosed with type 1 diabetes ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 11 05-04-2008 09:04 PM
Pete Townsend, looks like he enjoys this type of excitement... DarrylS The PatsFans.com Pub 0 06-23-2006 04:27 AM
OT? MAYBE? Which Red Sox would be "Patriot type players" PATSNUTme PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 38 05-12-2006 09:56 AM
Patriots type Players PATSNUTme PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 04-22-2006 08:33 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC