ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Oh, Jeez, not another he-wasn't-drafted-so-therefore-he-can't-play post.
Do us a favor. Talk about next year's draft. Future drafts are the only ones where position is important (because it determines first contract salary).
After the draft and once the contract is signed, draft order only matters to Al Davis and you.
But you guys really don't know what you're talking about. Three games? Three? That's how many games you arm-chairers are going by. Pitiful.
Woods has a lot of work ahead of him. His tenacity has been called into question by me. I hope I'm proved wrong, but I don't think Belichick is going to sit on his laurels with the OLBers we have now.
The fact that you don't like Woods, makes me think he'll do a good job this year
Yes, Woods did have a strange college career. Belichick has gone on the record before with his insight into the matter, and from where I'm standing Belichick is an awfully good evaluator of football talent.
Finally, the truth is out!
Woods was a colossal disappointment in college after his big sophomore season.
Notwithstanding his elite size and excellent combo numbers (which, truth be told, I wasn't aware of until Pat Chick gave it to me), he wasn't drafted in 2006.
Woods was a colossal disappointment in college after his big sophomore season.
Notwithstanding his elite size and excellent combo numbers (which, truth be told, I wasn't aware of until Pat Chick gave it to me), he wasn't drafted in 2006.
Do you believe we drafted a guy in the sixth round who many suspected didn't have the physical skills to make it in the NFL?
BTW, the 2006 draft class looks pretty sh-tty to me, BradyFTW. Definitely a down year--with the exception of Gostkowski.
I know I'm going off topic here and starting a whole new argument, but 2006 is looking like their worst draft class. I still think there is hope for Maroney but his time is running out. Also, I still think that putting Chad Jackson (a guy you traded a 2 and 3 rounder for) on special teams, (defending the kickoff) which tore his ACL, was one of the dumbest moves by BB. Not to mention, the Pats had one of the worst group of receivers in the NFL and Jackson was just getting over his hamstring injury which makes it look worse. People blame Jackson for being a bust, but I think things would have been different had he not torn his ACL. In fact, some players never recover from it. It was fine for the Pats to pick David Thomas in round 3, but drafting the same kind of player in round 4 (Garret Mills, who they eventually cut) was pretty mind boggling. The guy I wanted during this draft was Leon Williams who is an MLB for the Browns. Despite having a down 2008, he had a pretty good 2007 recording 85 tackles and 4 sacks as a MLB. I understood the O'Callahan pick at the time, but it doesn't look like this guy is going to develop into anything.
Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 07-07-2009 at 09:24 PM..
Some people have an idee fixe that they can never let go.
Fact: We have four positions to fill at LB.
Fact: we have four veteran incumbants, All with starting experience. Those four produced a Top Ten rated Defense, even though they were wracked with injuries, in 2008.
You seem to believe that there is a glaring hole there; but most would disagree. It is not even as if there was no depth. Inside we have two established veteran, ex-starters, Bruschi and Lenon, available as reserves.
Outside we have two veteran starters, Thomas and Woods. It is not as if there was no depth. Outside we have a proven veteran pass rusher in TBC, and a high draft pick, a prized rookie from 2008, who has had a year to orient, and spend in the weight rooom, as all said, was needed. A third reserve has spectacular size and speed.
Two of the four are Probowl quality; and a third is an aging ex-probowler. A LB squad, hardly bereft of talent.
Overall, this Defense is faster and younger than any of the Belichick era. It has the potential to be the deepest and BEST too.
I find myself having to constantly defend Woods as if he were a star; he may develop into one. But at minimum, he is a creditable, good-sized, speedy, quick, young, veteran, SOLB starter. If he is the weakest of the starting 11; which I don't concede; he is hardly a glaring weakness either, but a better than average starter.
Some people have an idee fixe that they can never let go.
Fact: We have four positions to fill at LB.
Fact: we have four veteran incumbants, All with starting experience. Those four produced a Top Ten rated Defense, even though they were wracked with injuries, in 2008.
You seem to believe that there is a glaring hole there; but most would disagree. It is not even as if there was no depth. Inside we have two established veteran, ex-starters, Bruschi and Lenon, available as reserves.
Outside we have two veteran starters, Thomas and Woods. It is not as if there was no depth. Outside we have a proven veteran pass rusher in TBC, and a high draft pick, a prized rookie from 2008, who has had a year to orient, and spend in the weight rooom, as all said, was needed. A third reserve has spectacular size and speed.
Two of the four are Probowl quality; and a third is an aging ex-probowler. A LB squad, hardly bereft of talent.
Overall, this Defense is faster and younger than any of the Belichick era. It has the potential to be the deepest and BEST too.
I find myself having to constantly defend Woods as if he were a star; he may develop into one. But at minimum, he is a creditable, good-sized, speedy, quick, young, veteran, SOLB starter. If he is the weakest of the starting 11; which I don't concede; he is hardly a glaring weakness either, but a better than average starter.
"Fact" (in quotes because it isn't a fact at all): If we can't get double-digit sacks from our SOLB (like we didn't in 2001, 2003, or 2004, or like the Steelers didn't get until last year), then it means our pass rush sucks and is pathetic.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.