Quote:
Originally Posted by farn
I'm on crack (I guess) because I'll go with the 04 as #1. Here's the problem : people equate talent with the offensive side of the ball.
#1-the 04 team only lost 2 games (one more than the guys from 07)
#2-the playoff wins were much, much more impressive as they steamrolled the best teams one after the other
#3-the defense of that team was better than the 07 defense (banged up secondary ? yes. but WOW, the rest of the gang was on fire)
#4-fluke, lucky... whatever you say about the 07 team NOT winning, there is something to be said for the 04 team that DID win
|
Yup,yup, gotta agree with you here! 04 we beat the best O and the best D on consecutive weeks....handily!
And the 02 team is vastly under-appreciated. I was at that last game of the year when we were down by 11 to Miami with 2 minutes to go......a TD, 2pt conversion, a D stop, a field goal to tie and another to WIN....only to have Mr Favre lose to the Jets...or we would be talking about 4 straight SBs! The roster had the same names, so I would have to conclude it had similar talent.
Our 09 team isnt nearly as flush with talent as we were in 04. Paying the D line, TB,wr's & all has thinned our depth without a doubt. We are thinner NOW than we have ever been since BB took over, and will rely on rookies and unproven 2-3 year guys to fill MAJOR holes.
I also think the 85 team was too low. I think there were more guys making the pro bowl from that team than any other. Our LBs and WRs were deep, our DBs were ballhawks and they were more than lucky to win that many games on the road to the SB.