Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2009, 01:15 PM   #91
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
So he hasn't "shown you squat." You aren't BB. You aren't Dean Pees. Their opinions are more important than yours.
That is why they offered more money to Greg Ellis and Jason Taylor. Also, they were rumored in trading for Derrick Burgess and Julius Peppers. If they were so excited about who they have, you wouldn't see them trying to get these guys.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-29-2009, 03:16 PM   #92
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 13,514
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Don't forget their secondary was awful and they couldn't get after the QB. But we can save that for another argument.
The secondary had 7 guys go down in the 1st five weeks of the season. Its kind of hard for the secondary to be great when you are having to play street free agents as starters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Every team gets bad calls against them, the Pats aren't the first to suffer from that. The Pats had the lead late in the game but let the Colts walk right down field and score the game winning touchdown.

That's just the way it is. Teams get shafted from time time and the Pats got shafted. However, their defense had a chance to stop the Colts on their final drive and didn't. Too bad they had to settle with Alexander. Maybe they should have drafted somebody.
This is just you ignoring facts. The REALITY is that the Patriots defense had stopped the Colts on the two previous drives and the offense couldn't run enough time off the clock. But, lets just ignore that. You like to ignore relevant facts and change your stance. You've done so in this entire thread.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Both, he hasn't done a good job replenishing the talent at LB and DB. This has caused him to use such a soft philosophy when it comes to defense. They use that bend, don't break defense for a reason, they don't have enough talent. Almost every defensive play had Samuel and Hobbs lining up about 5-10 yards off of the WR because they can't jam anybody. I'm actually glad both Hobbs, Samuel and Gay are gone because they too soft. In fact, Hobbs was notorious for falling down repeatability whenever trying to cover receivers and drawing pass interference penalties. I'm talking out of my a**? 0-4 since '04 and 0-2 on stopping game winning drives on the opposing team.
More made up garbage on your part. Hobbs wasn't "notorious for falling down " repeatedly when covering receivers. BTW, Ty Law and Otis Smith used to line up 5-10 yards off people as well.

One thing that you can't account for is injuries. There is only so much money and so many players you are allowed to have. That's reality. If you want to be dumb and think that BB has done such a horrible job, fine. Go root for the Raiders.

Is BB perfect? Nope. But He's a damn site better than most, if not all, of the other coaches in the league.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 03:20 PM   #93
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 13,514
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
That is why they offered more money to Greg Ellis and Jason Taylor. Also, they were rumored in trading for Derrick Burgess and Julius Peppers. If they were so excited about who they have, you wouldn't see them trying to get these guys.
It always amazes me when people say this. One does not necessarily equate to the other. If there is good talent available, you try to add it to your team regardless of what you have. Did you ever stop to think that they wanted to add one of those four because they are better than REDD or Banta-Cain? Nope. You're dumb arse immediately assumes that they are trying to add them because they are better than Woods...
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 03:39 PM   #94
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
This is just you ignoring facts. The REALITY is that the Patriots defense had stopped the Colts on the two previous drives and the offense couldn't run enough time off the clock. But, lets just ignore that. You like to ignore relevant facts and change your stance. You've done so in this entire thread.
And the Pats scored 27 points. What is your point? 27 points should be enough to win the game. The only change in my stance is that the entire defense failed. Big deal.

Quote:
More made up garbage on your part. Hobbs wasn't "notorious for falling down " repeatedly when covering receivers. BTW, Ty Law and Otis Smith used to line up 5-10 yards off people as well.
NFL Videos: NFL GameDay: Super Bowl XLII highlights

This is just one example. About 1:16 into the highlight, Hobbs falls down when he could've had an easy pick. Seriously, what the f*** was he doing on that play? However, Hobbs did get a gift from a wide open Steve Smith right after that. I'm just saying, Hobbs fell down like this a lot.

Law and Smith did give cushions from time to time, but they were able to jam receivers as well. Samuel and Hobbs were 99.9% of the time off the line because when they did try to jam, they got abused.

Quote:
One thing that you can't account for is injuries. There is only so much money and so many players you are allowed to have. That's reality. If you want to be dumb and think that BB has done such a horrible job, fine. Go root for the Raiders.
How come when somebody criticizes the Pats, people like you throw tantrums and suggest I should go be a "Raiders fan"?

Quote:
Is BB perfect? Nope. But He's a damn site better than most, if not all, of the other coaches in the league.
Your're right, I wouldn't take anybody over BB. I just think he could do better.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-29-2009 at 03:57 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 03:42 PM   #95
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
It always amazes me when people say this. One does not necessarily equate to the other. If there is good talent available, you try to add it to your team regardless of what you have. Did you ever stop to think that they wanted to add one of those four because they are better than REDD or Banta-Cain? Nope. You're dumb arse immediately assumes that they are trying to add them because they are better than Woods...
Dude, anybody is better than Woods right now. Woods is pretty limited athletically and has been invisible when he's on the field. He gets one gift sack from Favre and people on this board thinks the guy can ball.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 05:43 PM   #96
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,542
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by State View Post
Again, I completely agree with this football genius. Vrabel had done very, very little for us, starting with the Giants SB debacle.

Bruschi is our new senior citizen, the role filled by Seau. I have no confidence in Pierre Woods, though I do with his former classmate at scUM, Crable.

Isn't Pierre Woods the guy who gave up the SB fumble recovery to a tiny RB? The guy has no heart. No eye of the tiger look in his eye for that to occur. Pathetic.

He's forever banished from my positive perspective.

LBers for the Pats are still the biggest issue: they're too slow. We've covered up some of that weakness--or tried to--by re-making the secondary to make that now a team strength.
It takes leather balls to lead your ST in tackles three years in a row. Pierre Woods has plenty of heart; whereas you certainly have a lack of a commodity called b-r-a-i-n-s.

When you know what fast and slow is, maybe your posts would mean something. The new, rebuilt, LB corps ranges from extremely fast, Guyton, to merely fast, Woods. All the others are in between, except for oldtimer Tedy.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 06:15 PM   #97
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 63
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

I dont mean to interrupt the cat-fight, but the link that "what up bro" posted has an interesting part near the end.(i remember thinking amani pushed off on that catch)
When its 3rd & 20 & about 15 secs left, Moss has a chance to catch the bomb that brady throws, IF HE JUMPED its almost certain he would have.
Does anybody remember the clip from a game where just after Moss catches a TD, BB comes over to Moss in the bench area and tells him to "go up and get the ball"(mabye the bengals game?).
If you watch the part Im talking about(6:39-6:42), Moss was trying to catch it in-stride, it looked like he didnt even extended his arms all the way. If he jumps, theres almost noway he doesnt come down with the ball. I dont remember if we had any TOs left and there were only about 10 secs left, but that all I can think of every time I watch the end of that game.
I've noticed since hes been here that he doesnt really like to "layout" and hit the ground on catch attempts.
OK, back to whos right...(a change in D coordinators can change how much press we do)
MVPatsfan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 09:49 PM   #98
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MVPatsfan13 View Post
I dont mean to interrupt the cat-fight, but the link that "what up bro" posted has an interesting part near the end.(i remember thinking amani pushed off on that catch)
I initially thought the same thing, but I don't think that push would have been enough for Hobbs to fall down.

Quote:
When its 3rd & 20 & about 15 secs left, Moss has a chance to catch the bomb that brady throws, IF HE JUMPED its almost certain he would have. If you watch the part Im talking about(6:39-6:42), Moss was trying to catch it in-stride, it looked like he didnt even extended his arms all the way. If he jumps, theres almost noway he doesnt come down with the ball. I dont remember if we had any TOs left and there were only about 10 secs left, but that all I can think of every time I watch the end of that game.
I've noticed since hes been here that he doesnt really like to "layout" and hit the ground on catch attempts.
I was pretty pissed that Moss looked to give up on the play. You're right, had Moss jumped for the ball, it could have been a catch. In fact, there were times this season where Moss kind of lackadaisically throws up his arms and lets the ball go over his head. I'm not sure how many TO's they had left, but I thought they had 1.

Quote:
Does anybody remember the clip from a game where just after Moss catches a TD, BB comes over to Moss in the bench area and tells him to "go up and get the ball"(mabye the bengals game?).
I've never seen it, but people on this board have suggested that before.

Quote:
OK, back to whos right...(a change in D coordinators can change how much press we do)
I don't think changing coordinator's would make a difference because they only run the defense Bill tells them to run. I think it's more of a change in personal. I really think Bill got my memo and brought in corners that can actually press at the line of scrimmage on a regular basis. Samuel and Hobbs got annihilated whenever they tried to do this. Because of their inability to man up and jam receivers, I'm guessing Bill was forced to have his DB's play off a lot. With that said, I hope the days of playing that soft 5-10 yards off of the line of scrimmage and allowing teams to easily convert on 3rd and 5 are over. They need to go back to their Ty Law-Otis Smith/ Ty Law-Tyrone Poole days where they did a lot of jamming at the line mixed in with some zone. This is the kind of defense that has won them 3 super bowls in four years. Being able to have DB's that can man up and jam at the line really messes up the timing of opposing offenses. I haven't really seen this since Law, Smith, Poole and even Buckley left the team. Hopefully an improved secondary will allow an extra second for the QB to hold onto the ball, thus allowing whoever they have at LB to make a play.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 07:36 AM   #99
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 13,514
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
And the Pats scored 27 points. What is your point? 27 points should be enough to win the game. The only change in my stance is that the entire defense failed. Big deal.
HUH? Only only change is that the entire defense failed? You went from claiming that BB couldn't seem to find linebackers to saying that he couldn't find LBs and DBs to being unable to draft defense at all. You might want to follow what you actually posted.



Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
NFL Videos: NFL GameDay: Super Bowl XLII highlights
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post

This is just one example. About 1:16 into the highlight, Hobbs falls down when he could've had an easy pick. Seriously, what the f*** was he doing on that play? However, Hobbs did get a gift from a wide open Steve Smith right after that. I'm just saying, Hobbs fell down like this a lot.

Law and Smith did give cushions from time to time, but they were able to jam receivers as well. Samuel and Hobbs were 99.9% of the time off the line because when they did try to jam, they got abused.
People like yourself always go to the ONE play where he fell down. And ignore the fact he was playing with a sports hernia and a torn labrum. Its too bad that Samuel let the one go through his fingers and then also blew the coverage on Tyree twice. Both of those came before Hobbs was put in that no win situation.

Also, Law and Smith regularly gave up 5-10 yard cushions. Go back and watch some of the Three Games to Glory DVDs...


Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
How come when somebody criticizes the Pats, people like you throw tantrums and suggest I should go be a "Raiders fan"?
Because you haven't criticized anything. You've said BB downright sucks and hasn't managed the team well. You totally IGNORE the inordinate number of injuries that they suffered at times. And its not like those injuries were minor ones. We're talking catastrophic injuries. Ones that there is no stretching or conditioning that you can do to prevent.

If anyone has thrown a tantrum, its you. Because, god forbid, you actually take into consideration all the facts or admit when you are wrong. Like you were with Bradley.

I've criticized BB plenty. But there is a difference between criticizing him and ranting on and on about how terrible he is in regards to replenishing the defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Your're right, I wouldn't take anybody over BB. I just think he could do better.
Please show me where I've said he couldn't do better. Everyone can always improve. But the reality is that there are forces and incidents that you just can not account for. You just do your best to mitigate them. And BB really has done a great job at that when you step back and look at it. He's put this team in position to win when it had no business being there. SB36 is a perfect example. 2005 is another one. With all the injuries they had on defense, who would have expected them to still make the play-offs. Look at last year. Their franchise QB goes down and they still put up 11 wins and just barely miss going to the play-offs.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 05:22 PM   #100
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
HUH? Only only change is that the entire defense failed? You went from claiming that BB couldn't seem to find linebackers to saying that he couldn't find LBs and DBs to being unable to draft defense at all. You might want to follow what you actually posted.
You're starting to confuse me. I'm going to make this simple for you. Because I think BB has not done a good job drafting LB/DB from 2001-2007, has caused them to eventually lose big games because of a lack of talent and depth at the position.

Quote:
People like yourself always go to the ONE play where he fell down. And ignore the fact he was playing with a sports hernia and a torn labrum. Its too bad that Samuel let the one go through his fingers and then also blew the coverage on Tyree twice. Both of those came before Hobbs was put in that no win situation.
Sorry dude, I told you it was just one example. Do you really expect me to go through every game and show you when exactly Hobbs has falls down? Healthy or not, Hobbs isn't a starting corner in the NFL. He gave up too many big plays and drew too many penalties at critical times. I'm glad he's gone.
You're right, Samuel f***** up too, I'm not letting him off the hook either. He let a fourth string WR beat him for a touchdown which was pathetic. Also, Sanders and Samuel just watched Tyree when in fact they could have easily helped Harrison break up "the catch".

Quote:
Also, Law and Smith regularly gave up 5-10 yard cushions. Go back and watch some of the Three Games to Glory DVDs...
Yes, you already said this. I know they gave up cushions but they were able to jam when it was called for. The new group of DB's consisting of Samuel, Hobbs, Gay and whoever else couldn't jam if their life depended on it.

Quote:
Because you haven't criticized anything. You've said BB downright sucks and hasn't managed the team well. You totally IGNORE the inordinate number of injuries that they suffered at times. And its not like those injuries were minor ones. We're talking catastrophic injuries. Ones that there is no stretching or conditioning that you can do to prevent.

If anyone has thrown a tantrum, its you. Because, god forbid, you actually take into consideration all the facts or admit when you are wrong. Like you were with Bradley.
How am I wrong about Bradley? They had almost the entire third round to trade up for him but probably waited until it was too late. There were plenty of trade ups in that round. If the Pats wanted him that badly, they could've reached for him.

Because I haven't criticized anything? You completely lost me there. I'm the one on a tantrum? I'm just having fun with this back and forth talk with you and whoever else wants to throw down about how the Pats have stud's at LB. I haven't called anybody on this message board names nor have I called anyone in the Pats front office names.

Quote:
I've criticized BB plenty. But there is a difference between criticizing him and ranting on and on about how terrible he is in regards to replenishing the defense.
I think BB could do better, while you are satisfied with BB. Why don't we just leave at that?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-30-2009 at 06:52 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
clay matthews, shawn crable

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426