carolinatony

What I find interesting it that INDY/PITTS have not played each other much over the last 5/6 years.

jmt57

While the Steelers may have won two Super Bowls this decade they haven't been quite as consistent as the Colts - or Pats.

2009: no game; Colts finished in 2nd place behind Titans in '08
2008: Colts 24, Steelers 20
2007: no game; Steelers finished 8-8, in 2nd place in '06
2006: no game; Bengals over Steelers in tiebreaker in '05
2005: Colts 26, Steelers 7; Steelers won 21-18 in playoffs
2004: no game; Steelers finished 6-10, in 3rd place in '03
2003: no game; Colts finished in 2nd place behind Titans in '02
2002: Steelers 28, Colts 10
2001: no game; different scheduling format (3 divisions in '00)

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Keegs

no.

hey op, do you want cheese with that Boone's Farm?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

zoostation

yawnnnnn..... doesn't matter

godef

This is because the Steelers have not consistently finished in first like the Colts and Pats (another argument for the Pats being team of the decade).

__________________
See you at Super Bowl XLVI!

brdmaverick

yes, and this is because the years that the Steelers and Cotls both finished in first 2001 2004, and 2007, the following year happened to be the season in the AFC division rotation in which all AFC South Teams played all of the AFC North teams anyway.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.