Reiss on Cassel and free agency - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2009, 11:58 PM   #21
In the Starting Line-up
 
jsull87's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,251
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
Mike's been off on a good amount of things the past year. I remember him writing glowingly about Fernando Bryant during training camp but he didn't even make the team. He also was very high on Crable and Slater during training camp and Crable didn't amount to anything. Was he even active for a game at all?
that is rediculous logic in the case of crable... the guy got injured. by that same line of thought if mike was glowing about brady all pre season he was an idiot because how much did brady do this year. crable had 2 interceptions and a sack in pre season. i think that is not a bad showing
jsull87 is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-11-2009, 12:45 AM   #22
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere well to the West of Foxboro
Posts: 1,380
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFaninAZ View Post
This is sort of what I've been thinking all along. I've posted as much a few times, but I seem to be in the vast minority.

I just don't understand the Patriots' leverage here. Once they open compensation/trade discussions with any team, the team is going to be aware that the Patriots don't need Cassel for the upcoming year. And they are also going to know that, at the end of the day, the Patriots aren't going to want the cap hit that keeping Cassel will entail. Accordingly, I think the Patriots are in take-what-we-can-get mode. He's not worth $14 million a year if Brady can go, so they have to trade him. If I'm another AFC team with title contentions, I'd love it if they kept him and took the cap hit.

The Patriots best chance here is that they get more than one team in a bidding war. That's where this gets good. But if there is only one legitimate suitor out there, I think the Patriots are in the much weaker spot. A second sounds right to me.
Well, if you're in the minority, just how vast could it be?

Anyway, all these posts seem to project the idea that the Patriots tagged Cassel (at 14M+) just so they could get rid of him.

I don't think so.

If there is a front office in this sport that shows any inclination of knowing exactly what it's doing, it's this one. There's no wing-and-a-prayer with this. Belichick has always had a firm grasp of the market, and it's value for players of all positions. That's why he's as successful as he is in these endeavors.

The argument, "franchise Cassel - a 7th rounder himself - so he doesn't just walk, for 14.6 million", is spurious. As the league stands today, he (Belichick) knows what Cassel's worth is, and just who might be serious suitors for the man at the value the Patriots deem he is worth.

That assumes they actually want, and have plans, to trade him.

This, however, may be a totally erroneous assumption.

What I think may be happening is, they've told Cassel's agent to shop around, and tell the Pats if there's an offer out there that they can't refuse. In the interim, they've doubtless assured said agent that their preference is to keep the kid, and are more than willing to work out a long-term deal for him, one advantageous to all parties concerned.

It's a mistake to think every time the franchise tag is invoked it's a one-and-done type thing. While it happens a lot, yes, it's not holy writ come down from Mt. Sinai. The Patriots seem to like Cassel and his long-term prospects, and likewise, Cassel seems to like the Patriots and their long-term outlook.

As has been said before, good QBs are hard to come by under any circumstance, and while the present cap-space conundrum does make free-agency shopping a bit problematic, they are in very good shape draft wise.

And even with the present dour cap-space outlook, the final chapter in this sage obviously has yet to be written.

And remember - you can never be too thin, too rich, have too much memory, or have too many good quarterbacks.

Somehow, I feel Belichick is quite aware of all this, and will, by story's end, put all the doubting nay-sayers in their proper place.

My bottom line: Unless an offer comes down the pike that simply blows the Patriots away, Cassel signs long-term, and stays.
__________________
....and that's the way I see it!
Patriotic Fervor is online now  
Old 02-11-2009, 03:52 AM   #23
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,603
My Mood: Breezy
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFaninAZ View Post
This is sort of what I've been thinking all along. I've posted as much a few times, but I seem to be in the vast minority.

I just don't understand the Patriots' leverage here. Once they open compensation/trade discussions with any team, the team is going to be aware that the Patriots don't need Cassel for the upcoming year. And they are also going to know that, at the end of the day, the Patriots aren't going to want the cap hit that keeping Cassel will entail. Accordingly, I think the Patriots are in take-what-we-can-get mode. He's not worth $14 million a year if Brady can go, so they have to trade him. If I'm another AFC team with title contentions, I'd love it if they kept him and took the cap hit.

The Patriots best chance here is that they get more than one team in a bidding war. That's where this gets good. But if there is only one legitimate suitor out there, I think the Patriots are in the much weaker spot. A second sounds right to me.
I agree 100% and have also said the same repeatedly. I think ideas of a first are wishful thinking...
JoeShmoe is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 05:26 AM   #24
In the Starting Line-up
 
fair catch fryar's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 3,024
My Mood: Cheeky
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
Aren't these some of the same arguments that were issued when the Pats traded Bledsoe?

History has shown that QBs usually get traded for maximum value even with minimum production. Look at Rob Johnson, Scott Mitchell, Matt Schaub, Matt Hasselbeck, etc. None had much of a resume when they got traded, but they all went with a hefty draft pick compensation.

I think a 2nd is pretty low for a draft pick especially with the free agency and draft for QB this offseason. Doesn't mean the Pats will get more though.
I agree. There is always a need for a QB somewhere and with all the changes in FO and coaches this off-season, someone, somewhere will overpay at some point after the draft. May not end up being a 1st round pick this year, but it will include multiple picks.
fair catch fryar is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 05:58 AM   #25
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Back in Rhode Island!!
Posts: 9,086
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeShmoe View Post
I agree 100% and have also said the same repeatedly. I think ideas of a first are wishful thinking...
You don't think that it can conveyed that more than 1 team are intersted in Cassel's services?
__________________
Drink like a beast.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Patjew is online now  
Old 02-11-2009, 06:17 AM   #26
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Clonamery's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,153
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocE View Post
The Patriots didn't franchise Cassel at an exorbitant salary with the intention of THEN finding out his market value...they already knew they could get significant compensation beforehand.
Hello...so much sense right here.
__________________
Paul Brown: A winner never whines.
Clonamery is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 07:34 AM   #27
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and Free Agency

If Cassel signs long-term for the patriots, he would get starter money or he wouldn't do it. Everyone would guess the meaning for the team. Personally, I would then not then be counting on Brady extending. It simply isn't good business sense to pay two starting quarterbacks when your starter should have another 5-6 left.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriotic Fervor View Post
Well, if you're in the minority, just how vast could it be?

Anyway, all these posts seem to project the idea that the Patriots tagged Cassel (at 14M+) just so they could get rid of him.

I don't think so.

If there is a front office in this sport that shows any inclination of knowing exactly what it's doing, it's this one. There's no wing-and-a-prayer with this. Belichick has always had a firm grasp of the market, and it's value for players of all positions. That's why he's as successful as he is in these endeavors.

The argument, "franchise Cassel - a 7th rounder himself - so he doesn't just walk, for 14.6 million", is spurious. As the league stands today, he (Belichick) knows what Cassel's worth is, and just who might be serious suitors for the man at the value the Patriots deem he is worth.

That assumes they actually want, and have plans, to trade him.

This, however, may be a totally erroneous assumption.

What I think may be happening is, they've told Cassel's agent to shop around, and tell the Pats if there's an offer out there that they can't refuse. In the interim, they've doubtless assured said agent that their preference is to keep the kid, and are more than willing to work out a long-term deal for him, one advantageous to all parties concerned.

It's a mistake to think every time the franchise tag is invoked it's a one-and-done type thing. While it happens a lot, yes, it's not holy writ come down from Mt. Sinai. The Patriots seem to like Cassel and his long-term prospects, and likewise, Cassel seems to like the Patriots and their long-term outlook.

As has been said before, good QBs are hard to come by under any circumstance, and while the present cap-space conundrum does make free-agency shopping a bit problematic, they are in very good shape draft wise.

And even with the present dour cap-space outlook, the final chapter in this sage obviously has yet to be written.

And remember - you can never be too thin, too rich, have too much memory, or have too many good quarterbacks.

Somehow, I feel Belichick is quite aware of all this, and will, by story's end, put all the doubting nay-sayers in their proper place.

My bottom line: Unless an offer comes down the pike that simply blows the Patriots away, Cassel signs long-term, and stays.
mgteich is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 07:46 AM   #28
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 522
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and free agency

some thoughts:

1) BB can always bluff and say he has a 'higher' offer from KC - do you think Pioli would deny he was interested in Cassell when called by another teams FO to confirm this? (So BB would not be 'exposed' as lying).

2) re: some people think Cassell would rather just sit here in NE as TB's backup and take the easy franchaise tag money. Or he or agent will ask for too much money in a possible trade.

I can't see Matt wanting to hold a clip board for another 1 year or more when he can get a multi-year deal as a starter. Every pro athlete is always talking about how wanting to play (start) is very important. Especially as he now HAS starting experience and did quite well. Think he wants to go back to sitting on the pine? Especially as he was backup in USC all those years.

Plus I am sure his agent knows that the market for FA and draft QB's this year is very weak - old FA QBs (Warner, Garcia), JAG's or 2 Junior draft QB's (Flacco and Ryan were both Seniors). MAtt and his agent are bound to know that his value right now is at his highest and before all hell breaks loose if we go to uncapped situation in a couple years time.

3) re: other teams know NE needs to trade Matt due to Cap charge on 2 QB's. That also tells teams that NE is serious about making a deal which is a good thing for all concerned. TB's health at least shows it is a possibility to keep Matty (and there is cap space to do this).

Bottom line is it is a sellers market as far as potential franchaise QB's go (demand always exceeds supply). There are at least 5 (if not 10) teams that Cassell would be an upgrade at QB AND those teams have the cap room to pull the trigger. He will go for a first round pick OR at least multiple first day picks (like Schabb for two 2nd rounders). Book him Danno.

just my 2 ores worth (danish money).
SunnyDenmark is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 08:17 AM   #29
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 457
My Mood: Brooding
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and free agency

There are quite a few teams that need a solid QB. The Bucs, Vikings, Lions and Chiefs are in the first tier of teams that are desperate for one. The next group would be the Bears, Rams and Niners. This group just thinks it would be good, but not necessary to upgrade the position. There are a couple of darkhorse candidates we should look at also, the Jets might be wiling to invest two numbers ones if the alternative is to go with the JAGs they have on their roster, the Titans might decide that Collins is asking for too much and might get involved to create leverage against his demands, the Texans might decide they are that one player away.

Cassel's representatives are able to talk with all 32 teams and I am sure they have started doing so already. The Patriots are not going to carry both Brady and Cassel into training camp and the time after the combine offers them the most leverage with the tier one teams. Does Detroit decide they need an experienced QB, or a rookie? Do the Vikes decide they have to act quickly, they are the only team in the league obviously a QB away from the Division Championship Game. Tampa has a new coach and GM and may want to make a splash.

It only takes two teams to drive the price UP.
E Belichick Unum is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 08:45 AM   #30
In the Starting Line-up
 
fair catch fryar's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 3,024
My Mood: Cheeky
Default Re: Reiss on Cassel and free agency

I know most of us are "jones-ing" for more NFL info. to talk about, but the Matt Cassel situation seems pretty straight-forward. Cassel will not see a dime of that franchise-tag amount. He will either get traded and sign a long-term(most likely) lucrative deal or sign a cap-friendly deal with the Pats that nets him more than 14 million in a couple of years. He isn't the disgruntled, selfish player with a "Get Paid" tatoo on his forehead. He seems like a grateful and appreciative player that made the most of his opportunities and has a little patience and insight to understand that he will be rewarded in such a way that he or any of his family will not have to work for the rest of their lives if they choose.
fair catch fryar is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reiss has interesting unknown tidbit on franchising Cassel spacecrime PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 57 01-07-2009 12:42 PM
Would Cassel sign a long term deal before free agency? RIP#40 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 18 12-22-2008 03:07 PM
Pats Pre-Free Agency Review - Offense DaBruinz PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 23 02-13-2007 09:21 PM
Pats Free Agent List from Yahoo Digger44 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 02-15-2006 11:17 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC