Steve Mariucci on Cassel's trade value - Page 7 - New England Patriots Forums

***tanked_as_usual*** · 01-28-2009, 10:28 PM

the pats will trade cassel.........watch

Synovia · 01-29-2009, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farn

Good call, I stand corrected. It's quite EASY to move down if you don't care for value. Didn't the Vikings move down two years in a row by just letting time ellapse and a fwe teams drafted ahead of them by running to the table with names ? I guess, I did mean trade down AND get value.

Again, quit the hyperbole. You can get VALUE. You just can't get draft-value-chart-value. Why? Because the chart is an anachronism. You can't get 3000 points for 1.1. Could you get 2000? Maybe. Could you trade it for 1.10, and a handful of second day picks? Sure as hell.

Synovia · 01-29-2009, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DW Toys

I don't know about that. The NFL Draft Scout which is pretty reliable has him in their top 64.
DW Toys

32 starts, and a sub 60% completion percentage? That doesn't bode well.

***ctpatsfan77*** · 01-29-2009, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farn

Didn't the Vikings move down two years in a row by just letting time ellapse and a fwe teams drafted ahead of them by running to the table with names ?

BB might actually do this on purpose, but, according to what's been written, the Vikings doing that was sheer incompetence.

E Belichick Unum · 01-29-2009, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77

BB might actually do this on purpose, but, according to what's been written, the Vikings doing that was sheer incompetence.

The Vikes were on the hook for the salary slot of their draft pick when they did that. That was a great draft, there were like three teams fighting to get their picks in before the Vikings got theirs in. Probably cut an hour off of the first round.

Brady-To-Branch · 01-29-2009, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ice

I think I'd be very happy again at #10.

I think just for agruments sake, that IF Kansas City Wanted Cassel, I would not want #3 due to the cost of signing that pick.

IF Kanas city wanted it they would have to give more than a straight up #10 pick from San Fran. I would then try like hell to trade down from #3.

The Chiefs has the worst defensive line in the league and that # 3 pick would be a great opportunity to grab a D-lineman. Plus they might like what saw of Tyler Thigpen.

If anyone else thinks SF would be interested in Cassel or Brady, know that Shaun Hill had a pretty good season. I doubt that SF would give up the # 10 pick and give up on Hill in the process.

Shaun Hill game log

CanadianPat'sFan · 01-29-2009, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brady-To-Branch

The Chiefs has the worst defensive line in the league and that # 3 pick would be a great opportunity to grab a D-lineman. Plus they might like what saw of Tyler Thigpen.

If anyone else thinks SF would be interested in Cassel or Brady, know that Shaun Hill had a pretty good season. I doubt that SF would give up the # 10 pick and give up on Hill in the process.

Shaun Hill game log

Wait a second.....who was talking about trading Brady:banned:

Agreed though I think that they will keep Hill as the starter as he really did not do bad in his 8 games he started. I think they will keep that pick (#10 is a nice draft pick) to build their team in other places maybe a stud OLB as Lawson has been a bust in terms of his ability to get to the quarterback. Early on I thought that SF may be a good spot for MC but I think they are going to hang on to Hill and draft a QB in the later rounds.....not the first overall

DW Toys · 01-29-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Synovia

32 starts, and a sub 60% completion percentage? That doesn't bode well.

Nik Harris is a Safety?
DW Toys