Quote:
Originally Posted by alamo
The "Parcells without Belichick" argument was never about turning a team around, claiming the Dolphins season proves anything new is false. Parcells turned the Jets and Cowboys around without Belichick, arguably even the Pats (Belichick was only here the final year). The argument is about winning the SB, and he has only done that with Belichick. Think Marty Schottenheimer, but with a playoff win or two additional.
|
That ain't my argument, Buster.
Why haven't Belichick and Brady won recently, when they certainly had the most talent? Are they lacking? Are they losers?
It just cracks me up how the goal line of this argument keeps changing.
Bill Parcells was the Head coach for two Super Bowl wins. Is the argument that He had the best talent and anyone would have won?
Or is it that Belichick was really the head coach, not Parcells.
Doesn't the fact that Belichick and Brady had the best talent last year negate both those arguments?
But wait!!!!!
Belichick can't win without Crennel! Same logic.
Hold on, he can't win without Weis!!!
There's actually not 1 person here that can possibly win without one of the others!
Bunch of losers!