Interesting scheduling quirk [merged] - New England Patriots Forums

SVN · 11-30-2008, 08:41 PM

pitt,@seattle,@oak all 3 teams we play/played all have 10 days to prepare for the pats.

swheeler23 · 11-30-2008, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SVN

pitt,@seattle,@oak all 3 teams we play/played all have 10 days to prepare for the pats.

Oakland and Seattle could have a month and it will not matter.

SVN · 11-30-2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swheeler23

Oakland and Seattle could have a month and it will not matter.

seattle has a decent passing attack and with our secondary its always a challenge. donno about their defense.

swheeler23 · 11-30-2008, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SVN

seattle has a decent passing attack and with our secondary its always a challenge. donno about their defense.

Seattle is 2-10 , they suck.

denverpatsfan · 11-30-2008, 08:52 PM

Yes. It all goes to show that people who were whining about the Pats "easy" schedule are idiots who don't know how to properly analyze it.

Yehoodi · 11-30-2008, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SVN

pitt,@seattle,@oak all 3 teams we play/played all have 10 days to prepare for the pats.

yah its sad, i read that in the globe last week and too bad it worked out that way . . .

Pats726 · 12-04-2008, 05:38 AM

ust thought it odd that Pitts...Seatrle an dOak ALL have 10 days to prepare before they play the Pats...seemed weird....thoughts??

BionicPatriot · 12-04-2008, 05:47 AM

Roger JET Gooddell at it again!

(Just wanted to get that in there before others did)

***Rob0729*** · 12-04-2008, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SVN

seattle has a decent passing attack and with our secondary its always a challenge. donno about their defense.

If you mean crappy, you are right. Since Hasselbeck he has had a 170 yard, 1 TD, and 3 INT day vs. the Cards; 103 yards, 2 TD, and 2 INT day vs. the Redskins; and 287 yard, 0 TD, and 1 INT game vs. the Cowboys. Seattle may have the worst passing attack the Pats will face the rest of the way.

The Seahawks this year are a mess. They have no offense and no defense. If the Pats lose to them, they have no business in the post season.

Sicilian · 12-04-2008, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob0729

If you mean crappy, you are right. Since Hasselbeck he has had a 170 yard, 1 TD, and 3 INT day vs. the Cards; 103 yards, 2 TD, and 2 INT day vs. the Redskins; and 287 yard, 0 TD, and 1 INT game vs. the Cowboys. Seattle may have the worst passing attack the Pats will face the rest of the way.

The Seahawks this year are a mess. They have no offense and no defense. If the Pats lose to them, they have no business in the post season.

Agreed. Especially since they're the first of the back to backs. Looking at San Diego overall this year, we probably should have beaten them earlier, but I think we were a bit fatigued from being on the road for two straight weeks.

Not saying that'll happen with Oakland, but if you told me we were going to lose one of these games I'd pick that one over the Seahawks.