Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2008, 09:04 PM   #11
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IGNORE LIST OR BAN LIST
Posts: 5,651
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
The 2002 season and the JEST game just called. They want to know what games you were watching.
Football games have been played in harsh conditions such as rain and snow. In these situations, we clearly separate a good QB from a OK QB or the greatest one from a good one. Unfortunately, we don't see it in Cassel.

We dominated the division for 5 years and can't hold on to the title this year.

When facing a 'good' team such as Steeler, Colts, and Chargers, Cassel failed miserably.

As a GM, you have to ask yourself these questions:

1-Do I really need a QB whom I can't depend on in the most important games?
2-Do I really need a QB who can't perform well under pressure and bad weather?
NEPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 206

Updated 2/4/10

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-30-2008, 09:14 PM   #12
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IGNORE LIST OR BAN LIST
Posts: 5,651
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Hopefully, we will stop talking about 'franchised' Cassel and trading TB.
NEPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 09:19 PM   #13
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 9,775
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEPatriot View Post
We dominated the division for 5 years and can't hold on to the title this year.
And, somehow, this is solely Cassel's fault.

Quote:
When facing a 'good' team such as Steeler, Colts, and Chargers, Cassel failed miserably.
The Colts game is also wondering what game you were watching. Cassel didn't lose that game, the rest of the team did.

I'll give you the Chargers and Steelers, to an extent, but, as I wrote above, Cassel isn't supposed to catch passes, return kickoffs, make tackles, or block defenders--and all of those played just as big a role in the loss today.
__________________
LOCK UP THE GHOST. NOW.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 09:22 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,356
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEPatriot View Post
As a GM, you have to ask yourself these questions:

1-Do I really need a QB whom I can't depend on in the most important games?
2-Do I really need a QB who can't perform well under pressure and bad weather?
3 - Do I really need to analyze the technique, arm strength, accuracy, leadership, mobility and pocket presence he's shown through most of the season, or should I react in a knee-jerk fashion to his very first NFL game played in bad conditions against a top-rated defense?
PatsFan37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 10:36 PM   #15
Conveniently prepackaged.
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,609
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
I'll give you the Chargers and Steelers, to an extent...
Well I won't. NE loses and a chronic Cassel hater comes out from under his rock to spank his monkey and proclaim his greatness as a prognosticator, sheesh.

Yep, Cassel threw a couple clunkers tonight - big whoop, like we've never seen Brady do that. The turning point in tonight's game was Special Teams and injuries. ST's penalties, a turnover, and at least two long returns after losing contain allowed Pittsburgh to stay in the game and then take a lead.

The Pats ran well on the Steelers, they moved the ball well up until some ugly drops took affect to kill drives. The defense, with three key starters missing, and some subs for subs playing, held Pittsburgh in check until Special Teams hosed them up.

Yeh, Matt Light gave up a couple sacks - except pass blocking is also a team sport - it would have been nice if Sammy Morris had chipped on the first strip sack instead of just running out into his pass pattern. On the second one Pit created an overload on the right side and drew Kevin Faulk over there to pick up the blitz, leaving Light one-on-one with a top pass rusher who didn't have to honor the run with a huge lead.

Pit's "great" D was being carved up until Special Teams set them up with a 13 point lead, after that it was bad old "blitzburgh" because NE wasn't running the ball. Pit won by playing smart and taking advantage of NE mistakes - blaming that on Cassel just goes to show us who checks the stat line before they check the scores.
__________________
"Vampire penguins? Zombie guinea pigs? We're done for.... done for."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


J-E-T-S Mommy! Mommy! Mommy!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 10:58 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 949
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
Well I won't. NE loses and a chronic Cassel hater comes out from under his rock to spank his monkey and proclaim his greatness as a prognosticator, sheesh.

Yep, Cassel threw a couple clunkers tonight - big whoop, like we've never seen Brady do that. The turning point in tonight's game was Special Teams and injuries. ST's penalties, a turnover, and at least two long returns after losing contain allowed Pittsburgh to stay in the game and then take a lead.

The Pats ran well on the Steelers, they moved the ball well up until some ugly drops took affect to kill drives. The defense, with three key starters missing, and some subs for subs playing, held Pittsburgh in check until Special Teams hosed them up.

Yeh, Matt Light gave up a couple sacks - except pass blocking is also a team sport - it would have been nice if Sammy Morris had chipped on the first strip sack instead of just running out into his pass pattern. On the second one Pit created an overload on the right side and drew Kevin Faulk over there to pick up the blitz, leaving Light one-on-one with a top pass rusher who didn't have to honor the run with a huge lead.

Pit's "great" D was being carved up until Special Teams set them up with a 13 point lead, after that it was bad old "blitzburgh" because NE wasn't running the ball. Pit won by playing smart and taking advantage of NE mistakes - blaming that on Cassel just goes to show us who checks the stat line before they check the scores.
Throw in two blatant Moss drops, one in the end zone and one en route to the end zone that could have spotted the Pats 14 points to weather the storm rather than leaving them trailing by 2 scores. Add blind side strips/hits Light's side that maybe only Brady of all NFL QBs could have avoided. Throw in a drop by Gaffney and special team gift wrap of a TD to the Steelers.

Frankly, I will not join the Cassel for Brady cult, but I will not be putting the emphasis of the blame on him for this. He was the least of the concerns. Certainly some bad throws, but not so many that he cost the Pats a shot at winning the game.

This game was reminiscent of the 2005 playoff loss in Denver, bad weather, turnovers and including Watson running down the interception return at the goal line. Brady couldn't stop the bleeding then, either. This was not a QB loss, it was a legitimate team loss in all three phases of the game. I still believe Cassel gets a big payday if the Pats make the playoffs, more if he can win a playoff game. I hope he makes his money.
MassPats38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:00 AM   #17
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,735
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRiZ View Post
yea when Jackson is lining up opposite Marshall with Royal in the slot with Cutler throwing lasers to CJ you wont be smiling.
The polar-opposite standards you use to judge Cassel vs. Jackson would be hilariously funny if they weren't so patheticly misguided. Cassel has set a franchise passing record for consecutive games. As far as I can tell, Jackson has yet to have even a single very good game in his entire career. Yet, Cassel is a "scrub" and we'll be sorry for letting Jackson go.

Just goes to show that brains aren't distributed equally.
alamo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 08:06 AM   #18
PJM
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 89
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Actually I have been really impressed by him. Most teams are in trouble if the backup takes over (given that several NFL teams don't have a competent starter, backups are usually poor). Sometimes a team has a top backup in storage (Steve Young, Aaron Rogers etc) and once in a blue moon a miracle happens (Brady). Cassel has been none of the above but he has been much better than I expected. I said in week 1 that the rest of the team had to raise their game and unfortunately they haven't but we have a good shot at a 10-6 or 11-5 record and may yet make the playoffs. I can't understand why the bar has been set so high for Cassel - it's as if some people think Brady is a normal QB and everyone should be able to equal him every week. Who could we have had at backup QB who would have done better?
PJM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 08:10 AM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 9,775
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJM View Post
Actually I have been really impressed by him. Most teams are in trouble if the backup takes over (given that several NFL teams don't have a competent starter, backups are usually poor). Sometimes a team has a top backup in storage (Steve Young, Aaron Rogers etc) and once in a blue moon a miracle happens (Brady). Cassel has been none of the above but he has been much better than I expected. I said in week 1 that the rest of the team had to raise their game and unfortunately they haven't but we have a good shot at a 10-6 or 11-5 record and may yet make the playoffs. I can't understand why the bar has been set so high for Cassel - it's as if some people think Brady is a normal QB and everyone should be able to equal him every week. Who could we have had at backup QB who would have done better?
To be fair to the team, injuries have also taken a huge toll. But I agree that the rest of the team has let Cassel down far more often than Cassel has let the team down.
__________________
LOCK UP THE GHOST. NOW.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 08:14 AM   #20
JSn
Canada's Wicked Hosah!
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,655
Default Re: Cassel: what we've seen so far

Cassel had the average amount of sucky passes in that game. Overall, I don't think the blame is his. At the outset he made good decisions, read the D well, etc. I think he got nervous after realizing his blindside wasn't protected and that made things worse. I really doubt this game has dropped his stock with the folks that matter.
__________________
Check out the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
for my first feature film!
JSn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is...Why Cassel? AzPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 56 11-25-2008 06:07 PM
Pats in first place for Wild Card PonyExpress PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 68 10-27-2008 12:09 AM
Is Cassel progressing in intangible ways AndyJohnson PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 72 10-25-2008 06:58 PM
The Incredible Journey of Matt Cassel patchick PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 22 09-09-2008 01:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444