Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

View Poll Results: Should the NFL consider Playoff Tournament Seedings?
Yes 18 29.03%
No 39 62.90%
Undecided 5 8.06%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2008, 05:00 PM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,254
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

I get tired of seeing crappy teams make the playoffs just because they are in a weak division and just like College football should do the tournament,I think the NFL really needs to think twice and go for a seeded tournament for the AFC and NFC conference to determine that the actual BEST 6 teams of each conference enter the postseason.

This year alone proves that a seeded tournament would be the way to go - Chicago leads the NFC North with a mediocre 6-5 record and Denver leads the AFC West with a 6-5 record as well

There likely will be 1 or more teams that are 10-6 and sitting home for the playoffs while Chicago or Minnesota and Denver or San Diego getting in at an 8-8 or 9-7 mark - Does not make sense

Should the NFL consider a playoff seedings tournament by conference or should it remain as is ?

Last edited by PATRIOTSFANINPA; 11-25-2008 at 05:25 PM..
PATRIOTSFANINPA is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-25-2008, 05:15 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,863
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

I think the NFL should take a serious look at this BECAUSE OF THE FOUR DIVISION format.

When it was three divisions it was perfectly fine, with the best wild card team still getting to host a Wild Card game.

Oddly enough, the way that the system is set up now, we should EXPECT road victories in the opening round. Think about it, it is actually likely each year that the best non-division winner has a better record than the worst division winner (and those two would be setup to face each other in the Wild Card Round).

Thinking back I know the Pats had a worse record than the Jags when they squared off in the Wild Card round of 2005.

The NBA realized there was a need for change when teh two best teams in the league (Spurs and Mavs) faced each other in the second round of the playoffs. It's time for the NFL to do the same.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
brdmaverick is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 05:28 PM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

Doesn't the home field advantage change this year? If a wild card team has a better record...don't they get a home game?? I could have swoen it was changed..or at least looked at... (per Jags...lol a year or so too late...)
I like the way it is now of the 6 teams..4 Dic winners and 2...NO MORE teams...and those in tough divisions bad records..well...they MAY NOT get a home field and may be gone fast..
Pats726 is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 05:59 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
billdog3484's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlantic Beach, NY (Long Island)
Posts: 2,071
Send a message via AIM to billdog3484
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

i always thought it was stupid that a team that wins division and goes, say 8-8 or 7-9 would get in over a team that went 10-6 or even hypothetically 11-5or 12-4. its kind of absurd but i guess having the divisions creates rivalries and generates substantial amounts of money
billdog3484 is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 06:06 PM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

If one really wishes to have seedings..then get rid of divisions...just have two conferences of 16 teams...take the top 6...leave it at that..but PLEASE don't complain about weak divisions..if you don't like them..do away with them...period. If a team wins a division is the best they deserve to go. There will always be strong and weak ones..part of life..they are weak and will be gone..(I THINK the rule was changed so that wild cards COULD have home games...if it's so that is OK..) Leave the system alone.

Last edited by Pats726; 11-25-2008 at 06:08 PM..
Pats726 is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 06:31 PM   #6
Banned
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,370
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

I know it sucks but you can't change the format because one division isn't very good. It undermines the purpose of winning one's division. Unfortunately, the Pats could finish two games ahead of Denver but miss the playoffs because the Pats didn't win their division.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 11-25-2008 at 06:31 PM..
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 07:24 PM   #7
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,744
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

I don't know what the answer is, but I'd be steamed if the 10-6/11-5 Pats didn't get in over 8-8 Denver.
xmarkd400x is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 08:05 PM   #8
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
makoute's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,886
Send a message via Yahoo to makoute
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xmarkd400x View Post
I don't know what the answer is, but I'd be steamed if the 10-6/11-5 Pats didn't get in over 8-8 Denver.
No 11-5 team will miss the playoff. 10-6 maybe, not 11-5 though.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
makoute is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 09:41 PM   #9
praedica numerum!
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,281
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pats726 View Post
(I THINK the rule was changed so that wild cards COULD have home games...if it's so that is OK..) Leave the system alone.
No, wild cards can't host home games against division winners, there's been no change.

Eliminating divisions would be a disaster for the NFL, people would tune out in droves. The current system balances the importance of divisions versus the chances of a wildcard getting to the SB. After the Steelers and Giants 2 of the last 3 years I don't see an outcry that the wildcards are being unfairly penalized.
alamo is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 09:43 PM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Disco Volante's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,181
Default Re: Should the NFL consider tournament seedings for the playoffs?

I think the NFL schedule, division alignment, and playoff seeding is absolutely fine as is.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Disco Volante is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Favre's record in the playoffs JoeSixPat PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 6 08-07-2008 06:14 PM
Ranking the NFL Head Coaches shatch62 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 10 10-31-2006 01:42 PM
OT: Hockey Playoffs Hoodie PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 9 04-21-2006 06:21 PM
Who Is The Biggest Star Left In The Playoffs PATSummerallofthe80s PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 01-18-2006 10:08 AM
BENGALS: Lewis makes playoffs real Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 01-06-2006 04:58 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563