Pittsburgh & Cassel - 30/11/08 - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2008, 08:02 PM   #21
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
chrisfx811's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 829
Default Re: Pittsburgh & Cassel - 30/11/08

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
Right, that 25-5 record of ours going back to last year doesn't make up for the fact that jag QBs get some stats against us while we are beating them. We should be ashamed.

If you haven't figured this out yet, please start paying attention.
ONE OF THE TENANTS OF BBS DEFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY IS TAKING AWAY WHAT A TEAM DOES BEST. BY DEFINITION 'JAG' QBS WILL NOT BE FOCUSED ON BECAUSE WE WANT THE BALL IN THEIR HANDS. THEY WILL PUT UP BETTER STATS AGAINST US, BECAUSE WE WANT THE GAME TO REVOLVE AROUND THEM. AND ULTIMATELY THEY CAN NEVER SUSTAIN IT FOR 4 QUARTERS TO BEAT US.
Or would you like to remind me of the last JAG QB that beat the Patriots?
I think we have to go back to 06?05?

Hmmm, maybe you should change your definition of what a HOFer looks like, because the last time I looked LOSING wasnt a big plus.
I understand what you're saying, although yelling it isn't necessary. By all accounts Eli Manning wasn't even a top 10 qb last year, and somehow while progressively getting better, he outdueled our HOF qb when it counted.

With our prolific, record setting offense last year, we had Baltimore and Philly, with their backup QBs give us fits. Oh, and Baltimore not only ran all over us last year, their backup qb also looked pretty good. Yes, we won, but the Ravens were also the team that kept the Doofins out of the record books last year, so we should have won.

Call it whatever you'd like, but our defense has been weak in pass defense.
Giants won the SB with an insane pass rush that protected what was supposed to be a weak secondary.
The Colts won before that with a speedy pass rush, and some timely defense.
The Steelers before them.

So you're saying BB's gameplan last Sunday was to allow Pennington to throw all over us, because he knew we could 'hold' them to 28 points?
Their wildcat offensive explosion was higher, but c'mon... 28 points? The difference was Cassel and the O hung with them.
Was it BB's gameplan to put the ball in Favre's hands to the tune of a 1st half blowout against the Jests, because he knew we could come back on them?

BB's game planning based on the fact that we don't have a good pass rush, we are depleted with injuries, and are lacking talent in the secondary.
chrisfx811 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-26-2008, 01:35 AM   #22
Practice Squad
 
Steel74's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 101
Default Re: Pittsburgh & Cassel - 30/11/08

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSn View Post
Without question, you'll be popular here, then.

So let me ask you this: how would YOU game-plan against the Steelers? We're expecting to see a spread attack. Our Blitz pick-up and Cassel's footwork + sudden feel for pressure makes this the logical choice, at least until the Steelers show they can shut it down.

Defensively, I think our front three are going to have to attack like maniacs and hopefully we'll see some sacks. Hanging back to help the secondary is feeling like a waste of talent. We're pretty good at shutting the run down, like your guys, so I think this will very much be an air-ball contest, not unlike last night's Saints/Packers game. It may come down to the best decision-making at QB. And from what your saying, that could bode well for us.
First off, if Matt Light is suspended for duking it out against Miami, the Patriots' job gets a whole lot harder.

Having said that, I'd put Cassell in a spread-set shotgun all day, similar to what they used against the Dolphins this week, and design plays for him to move up into an umbrella pocket as Pittsburgh's devastating edge rushers, Harrison and Woodley, come pouring around the side.

McDaniels has been employing a similar scheme with increasing effectiveness in recent weeks as Cassell has become more comfortable, culminating in this week's drubbing of Miami -- one of the most impressive offensive performances I've seen this year.

Forget the run. Teams try to run on Pittsburgh to be "balanced," whatever the ***** that means, and wind up waist deep in dirt. You don't beat the Steelers by running the football, you beat the Steelers by throwing it.

There's a reason the Steelers are second in the league in sacks. Pittsburgh's edge rushers are (arguably) the best in the league. And I've seen LeBeau recently adapt to teams beefing up the flanks of their O-line by bringing Polamalu on strong and weak side blitzes, and rushing Lawrence Timmons as a down lineman. To havoc-wreaking effect.

I doubt you'll see a repeat of last year, with the Steelers blindly hurling blitzers against NE's line like bugs smashing into a windshield.

They'll be busy all day, but New England's tackles (assuming Light plays) are good enough to have a chance at stringing the Steelers OLBs to the outside as Cassell moves up into the pocket. The middle of the Patriots OL has to win man-to-man match ups in order to keep Cassell vertical.

The spread-set will force Pittsburgh to hold back on its pass rush, because unlike the vaunted secondaries of old that had Rod Woodson, Carnell Lake, Willie Williams -- guys you could leave out on an island on a jailbreak blitz -- this Steelers secondary is a liability against good passing teams.

On defense, the Patriots have big problems. It didn't think it could get any worse for the Pats D, then I read that Adalius Thomas breaks his arm.

Fortunately for New England, the Steelers offense, while being remarkably talented, is erratic. The play-calling under Bruce Arians is square-wheeled and dumb, the unit gives up tons of drive-killing sacks, commits penalties and Ben Roethlisberger is playing with a hurt throwing shoulder.

Against Washington, you saw what the Steelers O is capable of with a healthy, quick-release QB like Byron Leftwich behind the wheel.

If Leftwich started against New England and lasted the whole game, I'd give the Patriots a one in five chance to win on Sunday. Remember, I'm the guy who picked my team to lose last year against you guys.

Though good, I don't think Mewelde Moore or Gary Russell are the caliber of running back that New England's run defense shouldn't be able to stop if it plays efficiently. Moore and Russell can run well, but if they rack up yards on the ground against the Pats D, it will be because the Pats D let them.

That said, New England needs to try and get around Pittsburgh's o-tackles and force Ben to move up into the pocket, where he's less comfortable. The Patriots D has to jam Hines Ward at the line with the double team, put someone on Heath Miller like stink on ***** and make the Steelers beat them by throwing to inconsistent ding-dongs like Santonio Holmes, Nate Washington, and Limas Sweed.

Matt Spaeth is coming on somewhat for Pittsburgh at TE across from Miller, so if the Patriots leave him unattended, while Spaeth's not amazing like Heath Miller is, he can catch the football and he runs good routes.

Above all, New England's DBs need to remember that Ben cannot throw the long ball because of his shoulder, but given half a chance he can't resist trying.

Perhaps play loose on a Yo-man Johnson receiver like Sweed or Washington, tempt Ben to throw long and have a safety back for support. That's how Ben throws a lion's share of his total INTs.
Steel74 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is...Why Cassel? AzPatsFan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 56 11-25-2008 06:07 PM
How is Cassel any different than Aaron Rodgers? richpats PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 29 09-10-2008 03:01 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566