Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats
Terry Bradshaw won his last Super Bowl at 31, Joe Montana at 33, Troy Aikman at 29. Next year Brady will be 32. The idea that the championships were rolling in late in their 30s is simply untrue.
Well maybe if Joe stayed with the 49ers he would have won again there is no way of knowing.
Troy had a serious concussion problem that TB does not have thankfully.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats
Back to the "we're already the team of next decade" nonsense, and to those who say "look at all the qb's playing into their late thirties!" The idea is to maximize the chance at sustained excellence. If you look again at the teams of the decades--the Steelers in the 70s, the 49ers in the 80s, the Cowboys in the 90s--look at the ages of the QBs.....
Terry Bradshaw won his last Super Bowl at 31, Joe Montana at 33, Troy Aikman at 29. Next year Brady will be 32. The idea that the championships were rolling in late in their 30s is simply untrue. Occasionally things will come together and a QB will win one later--Plunkett did, Elway did (when the Denver team won because of defense and Terrell Davis, not Elway) but for championship contention year after year, you're not going to see it with a guy in his mid-thirties.
Bart Starr was 34
Elway was 38
Staubach was 35
Plunkett was 36
Johnson was 34
And those were just the winners. If you add in the players who got there but lost in the Super Bowl, you get
Morrall at 34
Tarkenton at 36
Morton at 34
Staubach at 36
Theismann at 34
Gannon at 37
That's a lot of quarterbacks getting to, and winning, the Super Bowl after 33 years of age.
__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344
Get your facts straight. They went back in to clean out the infection. He did not have a second ACL surgery.
Did they cut him again? That would be 2 (TWO) surgeries then.....those are the facts. If the first one was neat and clean they wouldn't have had to go back in again. The point is he is far from a simple cleaning out procedure. This is going to take some time and its not out of the question that he never comes back the same.
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by groganbootleg
Did they cut him again? That would be 2 (TWO) surgeries then.....those are the facts. If the first one was neat and clean they wouldn't have had to go back in again. The point is he is far from a simple cleaning out procedure. This is going to take some time and its not out of the question that he never comes back the same.
This is nuts.
Brady had ONE surgery, that's it - ONE.
He had another PROCEDURE - NOT a surgery - this procedure was done to clean the knee out and sterilize the affected area. This procedure was done using a needle and flushed the knee. The knee was NEVER opened for a second time.
We are now 11 Weeks out of the initial surgery and 8-9 weeks out of the flush when the infection was diagnosed.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Let them all talk - Haters Hate, that's what they do - We have three Lombardi's, how about you?
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Bart Starr was 34
Elway was 38
Staubach was 35
Plunkett was 36
Johnson was 34
And those were just the winners. If you add in the players who got there but lost in the Super Bowl, you get
Morrall at 34
Tarkenton at 36
Morton at 34
Staubach at 36
Theismann at 34
Gannon at 37
That's a lot of quarterbacks getting to, and winning, the Super Bowl after 33 years of age.
Out of 42 Super bowls 5 QB's were past their prime and won. Johnson was one and done and was there because of the Bucs defense. Philadelphia scored 10 against Oakland, Miami scored 3 points against Dallas's defense. Kansas scored 10 against Green Bay. Now Elway did have a good game, but he sure looked like he was on his last legs.
My point, defense wins championships.
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
In other words, the answer is "no"
Wow, so a 31 yr old with a major knee injury is not at risk for having more injuries later on? Thats a bold statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Ok, you really think that Cassel is a first ballot hall of famer? I ask, because that's what Steve Young is.
Young was not a HOFer when he took over. Montana was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
But it is a slam dunk. Brady's not getting traded.
Says you.....the thread is to discuss the relative merits of both options, not to come to a final conclusion. I think if you asked BB (and he answered honestly), he would tell you nothing is out of the realm of possibility.
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Bart Starr was 34
Elway was 38
Staubach was 35
Plunkett was 36
Johnson was 34
And those were just the winners. If you add in the players who got there but lost in the Super Bowl, you get
Morrall at 34
Tarkenton at 36
Morton at 34
Staubach at 36
Theismann at 34
Gannon at 37
That's a lot of quarterbacks getting to, and winning, the Super Bowl after 33 years of age.
See, your post doesn’t really refute mine. I’m talking about the best way to maximize the Pats chances to be the team of the next decade. Saying, “look, these QBs were old, but they were able to lose the Super Bowl!” doesn’t really help your argument. As for the winning old-timers, I already mentioned two of those five. As for the other three who were able to get one, I acknowledged that sometimes the stars can align for a team, whoever the QB is.
__________________
"And I'll tell you one more thing: You've got an all-out prizefight, you wait 'til the fight's over, one guy's left standing, and that's how you know who won."
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by FortressX
Well maybe if Joe stayed with the 49ers he would have won again there is no way of knowing.
Troy had a serious concussion problem that TB does not have thankfully.
But Joe didn't stay, because SF wanted to move on. Troy had concussions. Brady has major knee surgery, etc. This stuff happens when you get older.
__________________
"And I'll tell you one more thing: You've got an all-out prizefight, you wait 'til the fight's over, one guy's left standing, and that's how you know who won."
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by groganbootleg
Says you.....the thread is to discuss the relative merits of both options, not to come to a final conclusion. I think if you asked BB (and he answered honestly), he would tell you nothing is out of the realm of possibility.
In all fairness, If you asked Bill if the Sun would rise in the east tomorrow, he would defer to tomorrow so he could give you a more definitive answer, nothing with Bill is out of the realm of possibility...until it's reality and then he still won't comment.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Let them all talk - Haters Hate, that's what they do - We have three Lombardi's, how about you?
Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One
Quote:
Originally Posted by scout
Out of 42 Super bowls 5 QB's were past their prime and won. Johnson was one and done and was there because of the Bucs defense. Philadelphia scored 10 against Oakland, Miami scored 3 points against Dallas's defense. Kansas scored 10 against Green Bay. Now Elway did have a good game, but he sure looked like he was on his last legs.
My point, defense wins championships.
No, players and teams win championships, both on offense and on defense. For that matter, Desmond Howard showed it also happens on special teams. Generally speaking (not always), the teams who make the Super Bowl are pretty good on both offense and defense.
However, just for example, the past 2 Super Bowl winners have been ranked higher offensively than defensively.
__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.