ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Note I said offers. If all other 31 teams underestimates his worth that means BB gets to keep him
Thinking selfishly I agree . I do hope Matt gets all the money he deserves though (assuming he continues to develop positively).
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Note I said offers. If all other 31 teams underestimates his worth that means BB gets to keep him
Not necessarily. Even mid-low range starting QB money is a lot to tie up for a backup. If this is the direction it's headed, what happens?
We franchise Cassel. 14 million in cap space vanishes.
We entertain trade offers. Teams don't offer us as much as we had hoped.
Either A: We trade Matt for less than we wanted, and are still out a backup QB.
Or B: Cassel signs tender, costing the team a ton of money.
Or we could wait and see what unfolds and tag him if his stock is high come February... And if it is we risk nothing by tagging him because his market will be in the 5 year $40M with $20M+ over the first three and double digit millions guaranteed range to be someone elses starter with a shot at becoming their franchise QB.
Actually, you risk quite a bit by tagging him because the market value of Cassel is just speculation. Perhaps someone does want to give him 20M guaranteed (he'd already be getting 14M guaranteed for 1 year by signing the offer sheet; you'd need to push that to closer to 20M to make it attractive enough for him to move on). Even if they do, how do you know that they also want to give up something significant in a trade? You don't.
The "risk nothing by tagging him" remark is just wrong. There is significant risk. Since the Patriots would already be getting a 3rd round compensation pick, you have to question whether the risk of being stuck for $14M in salary cap is worth the improvement from an end of 3rd round pick to whatever you might get in a franchised player trade - particularly when other teams know that you're pretty much forced to trade him once you franchise him. The downside risk is large; the upside is murky even assuming Matt plays well over the rest of the year.
Actually, you risk quite a bit by tagging him because the market value of Cassel is just speculation. Perhaps someone does want to give him 20M guaranteed (he'd already be getting 14M guaranteed for 1 year by signing the offer sheet; you'd need to push that to closer to 20M to make it attractive enough for him to move on). Even if they do, how do you know that they also want to give up something significant in a trade? You don't.
The "risk nothing by tagging him" remark is just wrong. There is significant risk. Since the Patriots would already be getting a 3rd round compensation pick, you have to question whether the risk of being stuck for $14M in salary cap is worth the improvement from an end of 3rd round pick to whatever you might get in a franchised player trade - particularly when other teams know that you're pretty much forced to trade him once you franchise him. The downside risk is large; the upside is murky even assuming Matt plays well over the rest of the year.
It isn't if you accept the underlying concept that Belioli aren't stupid - it's their job to know values and market and they would not tag him (which doesn't happen until late February 2009) unless they are CONFIDENT that he has a market and he will net them something of value beyond a comp pick in 2010. BTW assuming a future 3rd round comp pick is presumptious since even getting a pick is predicated on any FA we sign not negating it as well a secret formula that reportedly quantifies how the player performs relative to the contract he signs.
We got a first for Deion Branch even as the other 31 watched him hold a gun to our heads. In this league somebody always desperately covets what they think you have... We could have flipped Asante in 2007 and likely gotten something a lot more valuable short as well as long term than his performance in the Superbowl (which this offense likely would have gotten us to regardless...). Now we may get an untradeable comp pick at the end of the 3rd round in 2009. Somebody elses second in 2007 and a conditional 2008 pick would have looked nice in the flying Elvis right about now...
Not necessarily. Even mid-low range starting QB money is a lot to tie up for a backup. If this is the direction it's headed, what happens?
We franchise Cassel. 14 million in cap space vanishes.
We entertain trade offers. Teams don't offer us as much as we had hoped.
Either A: We trade Matt for less than we wanted, and are still out a backup QB.
Or B: Cassel signs tender, costing the team a ton of money.
If cap vanishes for a couple of weeks or a month, what is the downside? We are $24M under the projected cap for 2009. Even a splashy FA can be added to the roster for a single digit first year cap hit.
We are not out a backup player. We have the 3rd rounder they reportedly graded out as a 1st round talent to replace the 7th rounder who hadn't played since HS...who is currently getting a year of experience as the #2 which is half the experience Cassel had but double what that guy Brady had when he stepped in...
It only takes one team with interest to make a trade and two teams to create a bidding war. If they are reasonable there is no risk. If they were unreasonable it would indicate they are either foolish or willing to pay the price. We're not talking Carl Peterson and his unhappy all world TE who wants out of a rebuild here, this is Belichick and Pioli and they always have a plan A, B, C...
We are not out a backup player. We have the 3rd rounder they reportedly graded out as a 1st round talent to replace the 7th rounder who hadn't played since HS...who is currently getting a year of experience as the #2 which is half the experience Cassel had but double what that guy Brady had when he stepped in...
A second year played who has never played a meaningful NFL game is not the same as someone who has played a full season (assuming he stays healthy) with solid quality.
It isn't if you accept the underlying concept that Belioli aren't stupid - it's their job to know values and market and they would not tag him (which doesn't happen until late February 2009) unless they are CONFIDENT that he has a market and he will net them something of value beyond a comp pick in 2010. BTW assuming a future 3rd round comp pick is presumptious since even getting a pick is predicated on any FA we sign not negating it as well a secret formula that reportedly quantifies how the player performs relative to the contract he signs.
It's mostly average annual value of the contract. Doing really well can help, but not much (in other words, even if Asante, God forbid, had been on IR the entire 2008 season, the Pats still would have landed a comp third for him).
More importantly, don't forget the poison pill currently attached to the 2010 season--it will take six seasons to become an unrestricted free agent. That means that if Cassel takes the franchise tag, he's still a restricted free agent in 2010.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It's mostly average annual value of the contract. Doing really well can help, but not much (in other words, even if Asante, God forbid, had been on IR the entire 2008 season, the Pats still would have landed a comp third for him).
More importantly, don't forget the poison pill currently attached to the 2010 season--it will take six seasons to become an unrestricted free agent. That means that if Cassel takes the franchise tag, he's still a restricted free agent in 2010.
But again, that's just another reason why he wouldn't be a risk to sign it...