PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree44Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2013, 01:18 PM   #21
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsFaninAZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,712
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

I just wish the reporting would be done accurately here about the true economics.

In order to understand whether Brady is giving up anything or getting anything, you have to ask a pretty basic question: What would Brady get as a free agent in 2014 if he had not done this deal, and is it worth more than getting a guaranteed front-loaded $27 million now for three years?

If you look at the Peyton Manning contract, you have an answer. Manning signed it when he was under a year younger than Brady will be when he would have become a free agent. He got $80 million, 5 years, $58 million vested if he played one year, and all after three surgeries. So, how would Brady have done in 2014, Florio?

Let's ask the question a different way. Suppose two years ago you had given the Broncos an option -- pay Peyton Manning $27 million right now and he'll play for you for three years starting in a year, or wait the year and then pay him $80 million for 5 years with massive cap implications. Which do you think they would have taken, Florio?

The only way this works out good for Brady is (1) if he has a career ending injury in the next two years, or (2) he sucks so bad in the next two years that he would be unable to have found a 3 year/$27 million deal in 2014.

That is worth something -- no doubt about it. Is it worth $53 million? Nope.
PatsFaninAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-26-2013, 01:34 PM   #22
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,585
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by resdubwhite View Post
He's a slimy horrible little man. I wonder if its actionable.
watch his face. The Toad.
Since Brady and the Patriots are public figures, first they'd have to prove they were actually harmed by the article (unlikely) and then they'd have the additional burden of proving that Florio knew what he was printing was false, and published it anyways (even less likely).
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 01:38 PM   #23
On The Game Day Roster
 
BrickPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: So. Shore
Posts: 423
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Any non pat fan reading this thread may think we're a bunch of homers but at the end of the day PFT/Florio should put up or shut up. He can speculate and theorize all day about shennigans but his opinion has the weight of a flea's yam bag unless or until he can back it up with facts.
BrickPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 01:43 PM   #24
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,341
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah View Post
Florio more than implies Pats "cheating". What's sad is that he cites what Elway and the Broncs did cheating the cap for 2 rings and all you read from fans below is Spygate.
Krafts tepid response to the furor over camera placement allowed his brand to be tarnished forever.
absolutely. i kept waiting for the damage control and instead they let the story run wild. we won't know why until someone writes a book, but the old argument that "fighting back would just have made things worse" after the penalties were handed out obviously doesn't hold here since things couldn't have gone much worse brand-wise than they did. somebody will probably write a B-school case someday on this as an example of how not to manage a crisis.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
PatsFanSince74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 01:45 PM   #25
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,341
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

There's a lot of money involved and this is an unusual, and threatening, move by Brady. So, yes, those who have nothing else to do will speculate and spin conspiracy theories. Just ignore it as best you can is my advice. The legacy of spygate is that people will assume "cheating" around every decision the Pats make that seems open to it in their minds.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
PatsFanSince74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 01:58 PM   #26
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
signbabybrady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,299
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Because the site is an excellent place to go when you want football information



He's a smarmy little turd who makes his bones passing on info, but makes himself happy by trying to impose his brand of morality on others. Read him for the information. Mock him for his opinions.
Nah I would just rather not read him the NFL network and NFL.com and many other sites have me just as informed without as much BS. Shoot even ESPN is better.
DefenseRules likes this.
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"

"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!"
signbabybrady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:40 PM   #27
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,298
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Because the site is an excellent place to go when you want football information



He's a smarmy little turd who makes his bones passing on info, but makes himself happy by trying to impose his brand of morality on others. Read him for the information. Mock him for his opinions.
Usually, I would agree with you. But this time he couldn't even pass on the information. He mangled it the first go around, and presented it with his opinion - and has been trying to justify that opinion since then with even more overwrought and asinine analysis.
BradyManny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:45 PM   #28
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
betterthanthealternative's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,933
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

The majority of comments are pro-Pats and pro-Brady. some even call the author out for poor journalism.
thenepatsrule likes this.
betterthanthealternative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:52 PM   #29
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,433
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal


Koma likes this.
patsinthesnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 03:01 PM   #30
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: PFT stirs pot regarding brady deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by signbabybrady View Post
Nah I would just rather not read him the NFL network and NFL.com and many other sites have me just as informed without as much BS. Shoot even ESPN is better.
Florio's an asshat, but he's developed a good website. When it comes to the breaking NFL news, no site on the internet is both better and faster than PFT.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Florio cautiously stirs the pot SVN PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 01-13-2010 06:43 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC